当我们研究细胞毒性时,我们学到了什么?绿色化学环境中的关键缺陷以咪唑类离子液体为例

IF 9.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Green Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1039/D5GC00836K
Ksenia S. Egorova, Andrey E. Kolesnikov, Alexey D. Tikhomirov, Alexander A. Filippov and Valentine P. Ananikov
{"title":"当我们研究细胞毒性时,我们学到了什么?绿色化学环境中的关键缺陷以咪唑类离子液体为例","authors":"Ksenia S. Egorova, Andrey E. Kolesnikov, Alexey D. Tikhomirov, Alexander A. Filippov and Valentine P. Ananikov","doi":"10.1039/D5GC00836K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Cytotoxicity measurements are widely used in chemical research to evaluate the biological effects of chemical compounds, particularly in the context of green chemistry. While these assays appear straightforward, experiments have shown that their outcomes strongly depend on the parameters engaged and the logic applied in data interpretation. In this study, using three common imidazolium ionic liquids tested in two cell lines as an example, we demonstrate how seemingly minor changes in the experimental setup can significantly influence the results, complicating data interpretation and limiting comparability across studies. This work stresses the importance of adopting a systematic approach to cytotoxicity studies, considering cellular responses as part of a complex network of interconnected processes rather than as isolated data points. We aim to raise awareness among chemists about these pitfalls and to provide guidance for more reliable experimental practices, ultimately improving data quality and contributing to safer chemical development in green chemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":" 26","pages":" 7863-7877"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do we learn when we study cytotoxicity? Critical shortcomings in the green chemistry context using imidazolium ionic liquids as an example case†\",\"authors\":\"Ksenia S. Egorova, Andrey E. Kolesnikov, Alexey D. Tikhomirov, Alexander A. Filippov and Valentine P. Ananikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5GC00836K\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Cytotoxicity measurements are widely used in chemical research to evaluate the biological effects of chemical compounds, particularly in the context of green chemistry. While these assays appear straightforward, experiments have shown that their outcomes strongly depend on the parameters engaged and the logic applied in data interpretation. In this study, using three common imidazolium ionic liquids tested in two cell lines as an example, we demonstrate how seemingly minor changes in the experimental setup can significantly influence the results, complicating data interpretation and limiting comparability across studies. This work stresses the importance of adopting a systematic approach to cytotoxicity studies, considering cellular responses as part of a complex network of interconnected processes rather than as isolated data points. We aim to raise awareness among chemists about these pitfalls and to provide guidance for more reliable experimental practices, ultimately improving data quality and contributing to safer chemical development in green chemistry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" 26\",\"pages\":\" 7863-7877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc00836k\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/gc/d5gc00836k","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细胞毒性测量在化学研究中被广泛用于评价化合物的生物效应,特别是在绿色化学的背景下。虽然这些分析看起来直截了当,但实验表明,它们的结果在很大程度上取决于所采用的参数和数据解释中应用的逻辑。在本研究中,以在两种细胞系中测试的三种常见咪唑离子液体为例,我们展示了实验设置中看似微小的变化如何显著影响结果,使数据解释复杂化并限制了研究之间的可比性。这项工作强调了采用系统方法进行细胞毒性研究的重要性,将细胞反应视为相互关联过程的复杂网络的一部分,而不是孤立的数据点。我们的目标是提高化学家对这些缺陷的认识,并为更可靠的实验实践提供指导,最终提高数据质量,并为绿色化学中更安全的化学发展做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What do we learn when we study cytotoxicity? Critical shortcomings in the green chemistry context using imidazolium ionic liquids as an example case†

What do we learn when we study cytotoxicity? Critical shortcomings in the green chemistry context using imidazolium ionic liquids as an example case†

Cytotoxicity measurements are widely used in chemical research to evaluate the biological effects of chemical compounds, particularly in the context of green chemistry. While these assays appear straightforward, experiments have shown that their outcomes strongly depend on the parameters engaged and the logic applied in data interpretation. In this study, using three common imidazolium ionic liquids tested in two cell lines as an example, we demonstrate how seemingly minor changes in the experimental setup can significantly influence the results, complicating data interpretation and limiting comparability across studies. This work stresses the importance of adopting a systematic approach to cytotoxicity studies, considering cellular responses as part of a complex network of interconnected processes rather than as isolated data points. We aim to raise awareness among chemists about these pitfalls and to provide guidance for more reliable experimental practices, ultimately improving data quality and contributing to safer chemical development in green chemistry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Green Chemistry
Green Chemistry 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
677
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信