Torsten Rahne , Hannah Schütz , Julia Dlugaiczyk , Laura Fröhlich , Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson , Bo Håkansson
{"title":"眼前庭诱发肌电位记录刺激极性的定义及其意义","authors":"Torsten Rahne , Hannah Schütz , Julia Dlugaiczyk , Laura Fröhlich , Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson , Bo Håkansson","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates the effects of mastoid stimulus polarity on the recording of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). The goal was to analyze how different stimulus polarities, specifically condensation and rarefaction, influence the amplitude and latency of oVEMP responses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Monocyclic sinusoidal tone bursts at 250 Hz and 500 Hz were used to stimulate the vestibular system in 21 participants with normal hearing and normal vestibular function. The stimuli were delivered through a B250 transducer in both condensation and rarefaction polarities. The output force waveforms were measured with an artificial mastoid and the time derivative of the force were calculated as surrogate for the jerk. For the different stimulus polarities and respective signal output, i.e., acceleration and jerk, the resulting oVEMP responses were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rarefaction stimuli generally produced clearer and larger n1-p1 responses compared to condensation stimuli. A pre-response n1 peak was observed for 250 Hz condensation stimulation, while 500 Hz condensation stimulation showed a secondary p1 peak following the main response. The output force and jerk, as recorded on an artificial mastoid, suggest that the inwards-directed force of the condensation phase is crucial for eliciting the oVEMP response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stimulus polarity plays a critical role in the measurement of bone-conducted oVEMPs, affecting both the timing and magnitude of the response and should thus be always checked and reported. For mastoid stimulation the most effective jerk for oVEMP recordings was achieved by rarefaction stimulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"465 ","pages":"Article 109344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the definition and implications of stimulus polarity for the recording of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials\",\"authors\":\"Torsten Rahne , Hannah Schütz , Julia Dlugaiczyk , Laura Fröhlich , Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson , Bo Håkansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates the effects of mastoid stimulus polarity on the recording of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). The goal was to analyze how different stimulus polarities, specifically condensation and rarefaction, influence the amplitude and latency of oVEMP responses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Monocyclic sinusoidal tone bursts at 250 Hz and 500 Hz were used to stimulate the vestibular system in 21 participants with normal hearing and normal vestibular function. The stimuli were delivered through a B250 transducer in both condensation and rarefaction polarities. The output force waveforms were measured with an artificial mastoid and the time derivative of the force were calculated as surrogate for the jerk. For the different stimulus polarities and respective signal output, i.e., acceleration and jerk, the resulting oVEMP responses were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rarefaction stimuli generally produced clearer and larger n1-p1 responses compared to condensation stimuli. A pre-response n1 peak was observed for 250 Hz condensation stimulation, while 500 Hz condensation stimulation showed a secondary p1 peak following the main response. The output force and jerk, as recorded on an artificial mastoid, suggest that the inwards-directed force of the condensation phase is crucial for eliciting the oVEMP response.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stimulus polarity plays a critical role in the measurement of bone-conducted oVEMPs, affecting both the timing and magnitude of the response and should thus be always checked and reported. For mastoid stimulation the most effective jerk for oVEMP recordings was achieved by rarefaction stimulation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"465 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525001625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the definition and implications of stimulus polarity for the recording of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
Objective
This study investigates the effects of mastoid stimulus polarity on the recording of bone-conducted ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). The goal was to analyze how different stimulus polarities, specifically condensation and rarefaction, influence the amplitude and latency of oVEMP responses.
Methods
Monocyclic sinusoidal tone bursts at 250 Hz and 500 Hz were used to stimulate the vestibular system in 21 participants with normal hearing and normal vestibular function. The stimuli were delivered through a B250 transducer in both condensation and rarefaction polarities. The output force waveforms were measured with an artificial mastoid and the time derivative of the force were calculated as surrogate for the jerk. For the different stimulus polarities and respective signal output, i.e., acceleration and jerk, the resulting oVEMP responses were compared.
Results
Rarefaction stimuli generally produced clearer and larger n1-p1 responses compared to condensation stimuli. A pre-response n1 peak was observed for 250 Hz condensation stimulation, while 500 Hz condensation stimulation showed a secondary p1 peak following the main response. The output force and jerk, as recorded on an artificial mastoid, suggest that the inwards-directed force of the condensation phase is crucial for eliciting the oVEMP response.
Conclusion
Stimulus polarity plays a critical role in the measurement of bone-conducted oVEMPs, affecting both the timing and magnitude of the response and should thus be always checked and reported. For mastoid stimulation the most effective jerk for oVEMP recordings was achieved by rarefaction stimulation.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.