湿地CH4排放模型的滞后温度敏感性

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shuo Chen , Kunxiaojia Yuan , Fa Li , Qing Zhu , Qianlai Zhuang
{"title":"湿地CH4排放模型的滞后温度敏感性","authors":"Shuo Chen ,&nbsp;Kunxiaojia Yuan ,&nbsp;Fa Li ,&nbsp;Qing Zhu ,&nbsp;Qianlai Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetlands account for nearly one-third of total global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. Recent studies found that the change in substrate availability and microbial activities can cause positive hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, which could serve as a critical metric for model evaluation in terms of the timing of peak emissions and their underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified the CH<sub>4</sub> hysteresis across 25 eddy-covariance sites and compared it with those from 42 models, including 13 biogeochemical models, 22 atmospheric inversion models, and 7 machine learning models. We found 21 out of 25 sites exhibited positive hysteresis of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in temperate and arctic climate zones. The machine learning models showed a widespread negligible hysteresis pattern. While biogeochemistry and atmospheric inversion models displayed a prevalent positive hysteresis, the atmospheric inversions guided by observed CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations estimated a larger positive hysteresis than that of biogeochemistry models. Overall, most of CH<sub>4</sub> models underestimated temperature hysteresis to different extents compared with the observations at 25 eddy covariance sites. Our research highlights the necessity of constraining the hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in process-based biogeochemistry and machine learning models, which will provide more reliable prior information for atmospheric transport and inversion modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 110704"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hysteretic temperature sensitivity in wetland CH4 emission modeling\",\"authors\":\"Shuo Chen ,&nbsp;Kunxiaojia Yuan ,&nbsp;Fa Li ,&nbsp;Qing Zhu ,&nbsp;Qianlai Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wetlands account for nearly one-third of total global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. Recent studies found that the change in substrate availability and microbial activities can cause positive hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, which could serve as a critical metric for model evaluation in terms of the timing of peak emissions and their underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified the CH<sub>4</sub> hysteresis across 25 eddy-covariance sites and compared it with those from 42 models, including 13 biogeochemical models, 22 atmospheric inversion models, and 7 machine learning models. We found 21 out of 25 sites exhibited positive hysteresis of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in temperate and arctic climate zones. The machine learning models showed a widespread negligible hysteresis pattern. While biogeochemistry and atmospheric inversion models displayed a prevalent positive hysteresis, the atmospheric inversions guided by observed CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations estimated a larger positive hysteresis than that of biogeochemistry models. Overall, most of CH<sub>4</sub> models underestimated temperature hysteresis to different extents compared with the observations at 25 eddy covariance sites. Our research highlights the necessity of constraining the hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in process-based biogeochemistry and machine learning models, which will provide more reliable prior information for atmospheric transport and inversion modeling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"372 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325003247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325003247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

湿地占全球甲烷(CH4)排放总量的近三分之一。最近的研究发现,基质有效性和微生物活性的变化会引起湿地CH4排放的正滞后温度敏感性,这可以作为模型评估峰值时间及其潜在机制的关键指标。在这里,我们量化了25个涡旋协方差点的CH4滞后,并将其与42个模型进行了比较,其中包括13个生物地球化学模型、22个大气反演模型和7个机器学习模型。结果表明,在温带和北极气候区,25个站点中有21个站点的湿地CH4排放呈现正滞后。机器学习模型显示出广泛的可忽略的滞后模式。生物地球化学模式和大气反演模式均存在明显的正滞后现象,但以CH4观测值为导向的大气反演模式的正滞后现象要大于生物地球化学模式。总体而言,与25个涡动相关点的观测值相比,大多数CH4模式都不同程度地低估了温度滞后。我们的研究强调了在基于过程的生物地球化学和机器学习模型中限制湿地CH4排放的滞后温度敏感性的必要性,这将为大气输送和反演模型提供更可靠的先验信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hysteretic temperature sensitivity in wetland CH4 emission modeling
Wetlands account for nearly one-third of total global methane (CH4) emissions. Recent studies found that the change in substrate availability and microbial activities can cause positive hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH4 emissions, which could serve as a critical metric for model evaluation in terms of the timing of peak emissions and their underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified the CH4 hysteresis across 25 eddy-covariance sites and compared it with those from 42 models, including 13 biogeochemical models, 22 atmospheric inversion models, and 7 machine learning models. We found 21 out of 25 sites exhibited positive hysteresis of wetland CH4 emissions in temperate and arctic climate zones. The machine learning models showed a widespread negligible hysteresis pattern. While biogeochemistry and atmospheric inversion models displayed a prevalent positive hysteresis, the atmospheric inversions guided by observed CH4 concentrations estimated a larger positive hysteresis than that of biogeochemistry models. Overall, most of CH4 models underestimated temperature hysteresis to different extents compared with the observations at 25 eddy covariance sites. Our research highlights the necessity of constraining the hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH4 emissions in process-based biogeochemistry and machine learning models, which will provide more reliable prior information for atmospheric transport and inversion modeling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信