Shuo Chen , Kunxiaojia Yuan , Fa Li , Qing Zhu , Qianlai Zhuang
{"title":"湿地CH4排放模型的滞后温度敏感性","authors":"Shuo Chen , Kunxiaojia Yuan , Fa Li , Qing Zhu , Qianlai Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wetlands account for nearly one-third of total global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. Recent studies found that the change in substrate availability and microbial activities can cause positive hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, which could serve as a critical metric for model evaluation in terms of the timing of peak emissions and their underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified the CH<sub>4</sub> hysteresis across 25 eddy-covariance sites and compared it with those from 42 models, including 13 biogeochemical models, 22 atmospheric inversion models, and 7 machine learning models. We found 21 out of 25 sites exhibited positive hysteresis of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in temperate and arctic climate zones. The machine learning models showed a widespread negligible hysteresis pattern. While biogeochemistry and atmospheric inversion models displayed a prevalent positive hysteresis, the atmospheric inversions guided by observed CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations estimated a larger positive hysteresis than that of biogeochemistry models. Overall, most of CH<sub>4</sub> models underestimated temperature hysteresis to different extents compared with the observations at 25 eddy covariance sites. Our research highlights the necessity of constraining the hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in process-based biogeochemistry and machine learning models, which will provide more reliable prior information for atmospheric transport and inversion modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 110704"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hysteretic temperature sensitivity in wetland CH4 emission modeling\",\"authors\":\"Shuo Chen , Kunxiaojia Yuan , Fa Li , Qing Zhu , Qianlai Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wetlands account for nearly one-third of total global methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions. Recent studies found that the change in substrate availability and microbial activities can cause positive hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, which could serve as a critical metric for model evaluation in terms of the timing of peak emissions and their underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified the CH<sub>4</sub> hysteresis across 25 eddy-covariance sites and compared it with those from 42 models, including 13 biogeochemical models, 22 atmospheric inversion models, and 7 machine learning models. We found 21 out of 25 sites exhibited positive hysteresis of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in temperate and arctic climate zones. The machine learning models showed a widespread negligible hysteresis pattern. While biogeochemistry and atmospheric inversion models displayed a prevalent positive hysteresis, the atmospheric inversions guided by observed CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations estimated a larger positive hysteresis than that of biogeochemistry models. Overall, most of CH<sub>4</sub> models underestimated temperature hysteresis to different extents compared with the observations at 25 eddy covariance sites. Our research highlights the necessity of constraining the hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in process-based biogeochemistry and machine learning models, which will provide more reliable prior information for atmospheric transport and inversion modeling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"372 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325003247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325003247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hysteretic temperature sensitivity in wetland CH4 emission modeling
Wetlands account for nearly one-third of total global methane (CH4) emissions. Recent studies found that the change in substrate availability and microbial activities can cause positive hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH4 emissions, which could serve as a critical metric for model evaluation in terms of the timing of peak emissions and their underlying mechanisms. Here, we quantified the CH4 hysteresis across 25 eddy-covariance sites and compared it with those from 42 models, including 13 biogeochemical models, 22 atmospheric inversion models, and 7 machine learning models. We found 21 out of 25 sites exhibited positive hysteresis of wetland CH4 emissions in temperate and arctic climate zones. The machine learning models showed a widespread negligible hysteresis pattern. While biogeochemistry and atmospheric inversion models displayed a prevalent positive hysteresis, the atmospheric inversions guided by observed CH4 concentrations estimated a larger positive hysteresis than that of biogeochemistry models. Overall, most of CH4 models underestimated temperature hysteresis to different extents compared with the observations at 25 eddy covariance sites. Our research highlights the necessity of constraining the hysteretic temperature sensitivity of wetland CH4 emissions in process-based biogeochemistry and machine learning models, which will provide more reliable prior information for atmospheric transport and inversion modeling.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.