{"title":"人类与野猪的共同生存区可能吗?基于最大熵模型的人与野猪冲突风险评估","authors":"Yaxin Zhang , Xiaodi Zhao , Lu Wang , Kun Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human and wild boars were found to coexist within an environment where ecological and socio-economic systems intertwine, leading to conflict. To assess the potential for mutual dependency and constraint between humans and wild boars, the concept of \"co-survival\" was proposed. The study focused on Zixi, Chongyi, and Xiushui in Jiangxi Province, which served as a national pilot area for wild boar damage prevention. A total of 203 human-wild boar conflict points and 15 environmental variables from 2022 were selected to predict the spatial distribution of conflict risk. The results revealed the following: 1) The factors influencing human-wild boar co-survival were found to be closely related to both the behavior of wild boars and the natural and socio-economic conditions of the study area. Specifically, areas characterized by steeper slopes and located farther from residential areas or mountains tended to exhibit a larger co-survival zone. 2) Investment in wild boar invasion prevention infrastructure was positively correlated with the extent of the co-survival zone, indicating that increased investment contributed to the expansion of the shared living space between humans and wild boars. 3) Human-wild boar conflict was most prominent in agro-forestry transition zones, with fewer conflicts reported in high-standard farmland areas. Therefore, co-survival between humans and wild boars was considered feasible in low-risk and medium-risk zones under certain condition, where conflict remained within a manageable range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the human-wild boar co-survival zone possible? A risk assessment of human-wild boar conflict using a maximum entropy model (MaxEnt)\",\"authors\":\"Yaxin Zhang , Xiaodi Zhao , Lu Wang , Kun Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Human and wild boars were found to coexist within an environment where ecological and socio-economic systems intertwine, leading to conflict. To assess the potential for mutual dependency and constraint between humans and wild boars, the concept of \\\"co-survival\\\" was proposed. The study focused on Zixi, Chongyi, and Xiushui in Jiangxi Province, which served as a national pilot area for wild boar damage prevention. A total of 203 human-wild boar conflict points and 15 environmental variables from 2022 were selected to predict the spatial distribution of conflict risk. The results revealed the following: 1) The factors influencing human-wild boar co-survival were found to be closely related to both the behavior of wild boars and the natural and socio-economic conditions of the study area. Specifically, areas characterized by steeper slopes and located farther from residential areas or mountains tended to exhibit a larger co-survival zone. 2) Investment in wild boar invasion prevention infrastructure was positively correlated with the extent of the co-survival zone, indicating that increased investment contributed to the expansion of the shared living space between humans and wild boars. 3) Human-wild boar conflict was most prominent in agro-forestry transition zones, with fewer conflicts reported in high-standard farmland areas. Therefore, co-survival between humans and wild boars was considered feasible in low-risk and medium-risk zones under certain condition, where conflict remained within a manageable range.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325001402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325001402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is the human-wild boar co-survival zone possible? A risk assessment of human-wild boar conflict using a maximum entropy model (MaxEnt)
Human and wild boars were found to coexist within an environment where ecological and socio-economic systems intertwine, leading to conflict. To assess the potential for mutual dependency and constraint between humans and wild boars, the concept of "co-survival" was proposed. The study focused on Zixi, Chongyi, and Xiushui in Jiangxi Province, which served as a national pilot area for wild boar damage prevention. A total of 203 human-wild boar conflict points and 15 environmental variables from 2022 were selected to predict the spatial distribution of conflict risk. The results revealed the following: 1) The factors influencing human-wild boar co-survival were found to be closely related to both the behavior of wild boars and the natural and socio-economic conditions of the study area. Specifically, areas characterized by steeper slopes and located farther from residential areas or mountains tended to exhibit a larger co-survival zone. 2) Investment in wild boar invasion prevention infrastructure was positively correlated with the extent of the co-survival zone, indicating that increased investment contributed to the expansion of the shared living space between humans and wild boars. 3) Human-wild boar conflict was most prominent in agro-forestry transition zones, with fewer conflicts reported in high-standard farmland areas. Therefore, co-survival between humans and wild boars was considered feasible in low-risk and medium-risk zones under certain condition, where conflict remained within a manageable range.