Xinghua Wang , Linlin Li , Qiyun Wang , Baichang Zhong , Yaqian Xu
{"title":"社交机器人对儿童语言发展影响的元分析:来自2003年至2023年二十年研究的见解","authors":"Xinghua Wang , Linlin Li , Qiyun Wang , Baichang Zhong , Yaqian Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Robotics technologies powered by artificial intelligence are revolutionizing language learning, particularly for children who are at critical stages of language development. With the increasingly prevalent use of social robots in children's language acquisition, however, a comprehensive understanding of their effectiveness in this regard remains lacking. To address this gap, this study conducted a meta<strong>-</strong>analysis of 27 empirical publications spanning two decades from 2003 to 2023, involving 70 effect sizes and 1544 participants. The results revealed a moderate to large positive effect of social robots on children's language learning, especially for the affective dimension in social robot<strong>-</strong>assisted language learning (SRALL). The influence of social robots on language learning was moderated by the demographical factor (school levels), research designs (social robots' roles, language skills, intervention duration, language types, and control conditions), and social robot characteristics. For instance, older learners achieved higher cognitive outcomes, while younger learners showed greater affective gains. Moderately extended exposure to social robots could lead to increased effectiveness, although the impact varied depending on robot roles and the language skills targeted. Social robots were particularly useful for the improvement of speaking and mixed skill sets. While SRALL did not significantly outperform the control conditions in the cognitive dimension, it demonstrated significant advantages in the affective dimension. Additionally, anthropomorphic robots showed a higher effect size than cartoon<strong>-</strong>like robots. These findings contribute to child<strong>-</strong>robot interaction research and practice by informing the design of social robots and the development of pedagogy in supporting children's language learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta–analyzing the impacts of social robots for children's language development: Insights from two decades of research from 2003 to 2023\",\"authors\":\"Xinghua Wang , Linlin Li , Qiyun Wang , Baichang Zhong , Yaqian Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Robotics technologies powered by artificial intelligence are revolutionizing language learning, particularly for children who are at critical stages of language development. With the increasingly prevalent use of social robots in children's language acquisition, however, a comprehensive understanding of their effectiveness in this regard remains lacking. To address this gap, this study conducted a meta<strong>-</strong>analysis of 27 empirical publications spanning two decades from 2003 to 2023, involving 70 effect sizes and 1544 participants. The results revealed a moderate to large positive effect of social robots on children's language learning, especially for the affective dimension in social robot<strong>-</strong>assisted language learning (SRALL). The influence of social robots on language learning was moderated by the demographical factor (school levels), research designs (social robots' roles, language skills, intervention duration, language types, and control conditions), and social robot characteristics. For instance, older learners achieved higher cognitive outcomes, while younger learners showed greater affective gains. Moderately extended exposure to social robots could lead to increased effectiveness, although the impact varied depending on robot roles and the language skills targeted. Social robots were particularly useful for the improvement of speaking and mixed skill sets. While SRALL did not significantly outperform the control conditions in the cognitive dimension, it demonstrated significant advantages in the affective dimension. Additionally, anthropomorphic robots showed a higher effect size than cartoon<strong>-</strong>like robots. These findings contribute to child<strong>-</strong>robot interaction research and practice by informing the design of social robots and the development of pedagogy in supporting children's language learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000399\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000399","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta–analyzing the impacts of social robots for children's language development: Insights from two decades of research from 2003 to 2023
Robotics technologies powered by artificial intelligence are revolutionizing language learning, particularly for children who are at critical stages of language development. With the increasingly prevalent use of social robots in children's language acquisition, however, a comprehensive understanding of their effectiveness in this regard remains lacking. To address this gap, this study conducted a meta-analysis of 27 empirical publications spanning two decades from 2003 to 2023, involving 70 effect sizes and 1544 participants. The results revealed a moderate to large positive effect of social robots on children's language learning, especially for the affective dimension in social robot-assisted language learning (SRALL). The influence of social robots on language learning was moderated by the demographical factor (school levels), research designs (social robots' roles, language skills, intervention duration, language types, and control conditions), and social robot characteristics. For instance, older learners achieved higher cognitive outcomes, while younger learners showed greater affective gains. Moderately extended exposure to social robots could lead to increased effectiveness, although the impact varied depending on robot roles and the language skills targeted. Social robots were particularly useful for the improvement of speaking and mixed skill sets. While SRALL did not significantly outperform the control conditions in the cognitive dimension, it demonstrated significant advantages in the affective dimension. Additionally, anthropomorphic robots showed a higher effect size than cartoon-like robots. These findings contribute to child-robot interaction research and practice by informing the design of social robots and the development of pedagogy in supporting children's language learning.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.