Jordi Guillen , James Innes , Natacha Carvalho , Roger Martini
{"title":"燃料价格、补贴和税收对二氧化碳排放和管理的影响:对欧盟东北大西洋渔业的应用","authors":"Jordi Guillen , James Innes , Natacha Carvalho , Roger Martini","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Governments support their fishing sectors through a range of policy mechanisms, some of the most ubiquitous but also least well accounted for are those that reduce the prices fishers pay for fuel by exempting them from certain fuel-related taxes. While applied in the pursuit of objectives such as improved economic performance, tax exemptions result in fuel being under-priced, meaning the negative externalities associated with fuel consumption are not reflected in the price. Under-pricing creates incentives to overconsume fuel, which can negatively impact both environmental and economic performance through overfishing and increased emissions. This paper explores the role fuel taxation policy plays in subsidising the fishing sector. We advocate that the difference between fuel consumption’s negative externality and fuel tax is the proper method to estimate fuel subsidies. To do so, we quantify the subsidies provided under different tax scenarios for a range of management situations, along with outcomes in terms of fuel consumption, fleet capacity, and economic performance. When compared to prices that account for the negative externalities, current policy represents a subsidy of just under one billion euros annually for the EU fishing fleet operating in the Northeast Atlantic. We also find that, even in the absence of tax policy reform, reducing fishing effort to a level compatible with MSY based management objectives would substantially improve profits while reducing fuel consumption. These findings highlight that ensuring management can meet existing objectives and reforming policy so that fuel is no longer under-priced are clear opportunities to improve fishery performance outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 106814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of fuel prices, subsidies and taxes on CO2 emissions and management: An application to the EU Northeast Atlantic fisheries\",\"authors\":\"Jordi Guillen , James Innes , Natacha Carvalho , Roger Martini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Governments support their fishing sectors through a range of policy mechanisms, some of the most ubiquitous but also least well accounted for are those that reduce the prices fishers pay for fuel by exempting them from certain fuel-related taxes. While applied in the pursuit of objectives such as improved economic performance, tax exemptions result in fuel being under-priced, meaning the negative externalities associated with fuel consumption are not reflected in the price. Under-pricing creates incentives to overconsume fuel, which can negatively impact both environmental and economic performance through overfishing and increased emissions. This paper explores the role fuel taxation policy plays in subsidising the fishing sector. We advocate that the difference between fuel consumption’s negative externality and fuel tax is the proper method to estimate fuel subsidies. To do so, we quantify the subsidies provided under different tax scenarios for a range of management situations, along with outcomes in terms of fuel consumption, fleet capacity, and economic performance. When compared to prices that account for the negative externalities, current policy represents a subsidy of just under one billion euros annually for the EU fishing fleet operating in the Northeast Atlantic. We also find that, even in the absence of tax policy reform, reducing fishing effort to a level compatible with MSY based management objectives would substantially improve profits while reducing fuel consumption. These findings highlight that ensuring management can meet existing objectives and reforming policy so that fuel is no longer under-priced are clear opportunities to improve fishery performance outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"180 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of fuel prices, subsidies and taxes on CO2 emissions and management: An application to the EU Northeast Atlantic fisheries
Governments support their fishing sectors through a range of policy mechanisms, some of the most ubiquitous but also least well accounted for are those that reduce the prices fishers pay for fuel by exempting them from certain fuel-related taxes. While applied in the pursuit of objectives such as improved economic performance, tax exemptions result in fuel being under-priced, meaning the negative externalities associated with fuel consumption are not reflected in the price. Under-pricing creates incentives to overconsume fuel, which can negatively impact both environmental and economic performance through overfishing and increased emissions. This paper explores the role fuel taxation policy plays in subsidising the fishing sector. We advocate that the difference between fuel consumption’s negative externality and fuel tax is the proper method to estimate fuel subsidies. To do so, we quantify the subsidies provided under different tax scenarios for a range of management situations, along with outcomes in terms of fuel consumption, fleet capacity, and economic performance. When compared to prices that account for the negative externalities, current policy represents a subsidy of just under one billion euros annually for the EU fishing fleet operating in the Northeast Atlantic. We also find that, even in the absence of tax policy reform, reducing fishing effort to a level compatible with MSY based management objectives would substantially improve profits while reducing fuel consumption. These findings highlight that ensuring management can meet existing objectives and reforming policy so that fuel is no longer under-priced are clear opportunities to improve fishery performance outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.