机械手康复对脑卒中患者手功能和疲劳的影响(RoHa-S)

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Letizia Castelli , Davide Giannuzzi , Claudia Loreti , Irene Falcolini , Erika Tamburro , Anna Maria Malizia , Chiara Iacovelli , Lorenzo Biscotti , Luca Padua , Silvia Giovannini
{"title":"机械手康复对脑卒中患者手功能和疲劳的影响(RoHa-S)","authors":"Letizia Castelli ,&nbsp;Davide Giannuzzi ,&nbsp;Claudia Loreti ,&nbsp;Irene Falcolini ,&nbsp;Erika Tamburro ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Malizia ,&nbsp;Chiara Iacovelli ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Biscotti ,&nbsp;Luca Padua ,&nbsp;Silvia Giovannini","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Considering the wide use of technology and robotics in rehabilitation, this study investigates the potential impact of robotic rehabilitation with the robot end-effector Amadeo® on hand function and its possible effects on fatigue in patients with stroke outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single blind, randomized-controlled pilot study. Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (G-AMA) for robotic rehabilitation with Amadeo® and conventional rehabilitation, or the control group (G-CON) for conventional rehabilitation. All patients received 45-minute rehabilitation thrice a week for four weeks. Clinical measures for motor function, spasticity, autonomy, quality of life, and fatigue were used to assess all patients at baseline and end of treatment. Instrumental assessment included Amadeo® force and range of motion (ROM) measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Considering clinical evaluations, all patients indifferent to the group showed statistically significant improvement at the end of treatment. Comparison between groups showed a statistically significant difference in motor function (p &lt; 0.001), autonomy (p &lt; 0.001) and fatigue (p &lt; 0.001). Regarding instrumental assessment, only G-AMA patients showed statistically significant differences in several parameters, especially considering the percent ROM of individual fingers and hand; inter-group comparison showed a significant difference in hand extension strength (p = 0.042) and percent ROM of individual fingers (p &lt; 0.001) and hand (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that robotic hand treatment with Amadeo®, combined with traditional methods, reduces fatigue in stroke patients with hand impairments. Therapeutic combinations of new technologies and conventional approaches can improve rehabilitation outcomes and patients’ quality of life, transforming post-stroke rehabilitation and other disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 111445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of robotic hand rehabilitation on hand function and fatigue in patients with stroke (RoHa-S)\",\"authors\":\"Letizia Castelli ,&nbsp;Davide Giannuzzi ,&nbsp;Claudia Loreti ,&nbsp;Irene Falcolini ,&nbsp;Erika Tamburro ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Malizia ,&nbsp;Chiara Iacovelli ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Biscotti ,&nbsp;Luca Padua ,&nbsp;Silvia Giovannini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Considering the wide use of technology and robotics in rehabilitation, this study investigates the potential impact of robotic rehabilitation with the robot end-effector Amadeo® on hand function and its possible effects on fatigue in patients with stroke outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single blind, randomized-controlled pilot study. Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (G-AMA) for robotic rehabilitation with Amadeo® and conventional rehabilitation, or the control group (G-CON) for conventional rehabilitation. All patients received 45-minute rehabilitation thrice a week for four weeks. Clinical measures for motor function, spasticity, autonomy, quality of life, and fatigue were used to assess all patients at baseline and end of treatment. Instrumental assessment included Amadeo® force and range of motion (ROM) measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Considering clinical evaluations, all patients indifferent to the group showed statistically significant improvement at the end of treatment. Comparison between groups showed a statistically significant difference in motor function (p &lt; 0.001), autonomy (p &lt; 0.001) and fatigue (p &lt; 0.001). Regarding instrumental assessment, only G-AMA patients showed statistically significant differences in several parameters, especially considering the percent ROM of individual fingers and hand; inter-group comparison showed a significant difference in hand extension strength (p = 0.042) and percent ROM of individual fingers (p &lt; 0.001) and hand (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that robotic hand treatment with Amadeo®, combined with traditional methods, reduces fatigue in stroke patients with hand impairments. Therapeutic combinations of new technologies and conventional approaches can improve rehabilitation outcomes and patients’ quality of life, transforming post-stroke rehabilitation and other disorders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825004187\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825004187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到技术和机器人技术在康复中的广泛应用,本研究探讨了机器人末端执行器Amadeo®对脑卒中患者手部功能的潜在影响及其对疲劳的可能影响。方法本研究为单盲、随机对照先导研究。24例患者随机分为实验组(G-AMA)和对照组(G-CON),分别采用Amadeo®机器人康复和常规康复。所有患者每周三次接受45分钟的康复治疗,持续四周。运动功能、痉挛、自主、生活质量和疲劳的临床测量用于评估所有患者在基线和治疗结束时的情况。仪器评估包括Amadeo®力和运动范围(ROM)测量。结果综合临床评价,两组患者在治疗结束时均有统计学意义的改善。组间比较,运动功能差异有统计学意义(p <;0.001)、自主性(p <;0.001)和疲劳(p <;0.001)。在仪器评估方面,只有G-AMA患者在几个参数上有统计学差异,特别是考虑到单个手指和手的ROM百分比;组间比较显示手伸展强度(p = 0.042)和单个手指活动度百分比(p <;0.001)和手部(p <;0.001)。结论本研究表明,Amadeo®机械手治疗与传统方法相结合,可减轻脑卒中手损伤患者的疲劳。新技术与传统方法的治疗结合可以改善康复效果和患者的生活质量,改变脑卒中后康复和其他障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of robotic hand rehabilitation on hand function and fatigue in patients with stroke (RoHa-S)

Objective

Considering the wide use of technology and robotics in rehabilitation, this study investigates the potential impact of robotic rehabilitation with the robot end-effector Amadeo® on hand function and its possible effects on fatigue in patients with stroke outcomes.

Methods

This is a single blind, randomized-controlled pilot study. Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (G-AMA) for robotic rehabilitation with Amadeo® and conventional rehabilitation, or the control group (G-CON) for conventional rehabilitation. All patients received 45-minute rehabilitation thrice a week for four weeks. Clinical measures for motor function, spasticity, autonomy, quality of life, and fatigue were used to assess all patients at baseline and end of treatment. Instrumental assessment included Amadeo® force and range of motion (ROM) measurements.

Results

Considering clinical evaluations, all patients indifferent to the group showed statistically significant improvement at the end of treatment. Comparison between groups showed a statistically significant difference in motor function (p < 0.001), autonomy (p < 0.001) and fatigue (p < 0.001). Regarding instrumental assessment, only G-AMA patients showed statistically significant differences in several parameters, especially considering the percent ROM of individual fingers and hand; inter-group comparison showed a significant difference in hand extension strength (p = 0.042) and percent ROM of individual fingers (p < 0.001) and hand (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study suggests that robotic hand treatment with Amadeo®, combined with traditional methods, reduces fatigue in stroke patients with hand impairments. Therapeutic combinations of new technologies and conventional approaches can improve rehabilitation outcomes and patients’ quality of life, transforming post-stroke rehabilitation and other disorders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信