{"title":"评估用尿肌酐排泄率来估计泌乳奶牛的尿量","authors":"K. Park, J. Kim, H. Hu, C. Lee","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Creatinine concentration in urine is often used to estimate urine output in cows. Studies have commonly used a fixed coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate, although this coefficient varies among studies. However, 29 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup> is the most popular value. The current study determined the coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate of individual cows and validated the use of a fixed coefficient to estimate urine output. Two experiments were conducted with 8 cows in each experiment. The experiments were conducted in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. In experiment 1, dietary treatments were 2 levels of RDP with or without isoacids supplementation in 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. In experiment 2, diets at 2 levels of DCAD supplemented with saturated fatty acids or a Met analog were fed to cows as dietary treatments. Total urine was collected over multiple days in each period, followed by BW measurements before feeding on 2 consecutive days. Daily subsamples of urine were composited by cow and period and assayed for creatinine concentration. The coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate was calculated by daily urine creatinine excretion (mg/d) divided by BW for individual cows. Data from each experiment were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, where fixed effects of period, diet, and their interaction and random effects of cow within square were included. Additionally, data from both experiments were combined and analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, where cow within trial and period within trial were random effects and trial was the fixed effect. The experimental period and dietary treatments did not affect total urinary creatinine excretion or the coefficient within each experiment, although the periods influenced milk yield and BW. There was no difference in DMI and milk yield between the experiments, but BW differed (672 vs. 746 kg). In addition, urinary creatinine excretion (12.8 vs. 17.8 g/d) and the coefficient (19.1 vs. 23.9 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup>) were greater in experiment 2 compared with experiment 1. A linear regression analysis between BW and urinary creatinine excretion was conducted using the MIXED procedure of SAS (experiment as a random effect). The coefficient of 22.0 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup> was obtained from the analysis and this was lower than the 29 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup> value that has been commonly used in the literature. In conclusion, the coefficient varied among cows, likely because BW does not represent muscle mass. Therefore, caution is needed when urine output is estimated using a fixed coefficient in an experiment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 508-512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the use of urinary creatinine excretion rate to estimate urine output in lactating cows\",\"authors\":\"K. Park, J. Kim, H. Hu, C. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Creatinine concentration in urine is often used to estimate urine output in cows. Studies have commonly used a fixed coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate, although this coefficient varies among studies. However, 29 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup> is the most popular value. The current study determined the coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate of individual cows and validated the use of a fixed coefficient to estimate urine output. Two experiments were conducted with 8 cows in each experiment. The experiments were conducted in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. In experiment 1, dietary treatments were 2 levels of RDP with or without isoacids supplementation in 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. In experiment 2, diets at 2 levels of DCAD supplemented with saturated fatty acids or a Met analog were fed to cows as dietary treatments. Total urine was collected over multiple days in each period, followed by BW measurements before feeding on 2 consecutive days. Daily subsamples of urine were composited by cow and period and assayed for creatinine concentration. The coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate was calculated by daily urine creatinine excretion (mg/d) divided by BW for individual cows. Data from each experiment were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, where fixed effects of period, diet, and their interaction and random effects of cow within square were included. Additionally, data from both experiments were combined and analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, where cow within trial and period within trial were random effects and trial was the fixed effect. The experimental period and dietary treatments did not affect total urinary creatinine excretion or the coefficient within each experiment, although the periods influenced milk yield and BW. There was no difference in DMI and milk yield between the experiments, but BW differed (672 vs. 746 kg). In addition, urinary creatinine excretion (12.8 vs. 17.8 g/d) and the coefficient (19.1 vs. 23.9 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup>) were greater in experiment 2 compared with experiment 1. A linear regression analysis between BW and urinary creatinine excretion was conducted using the MIXED procedure of SAS (experiment as a random effect). The coefficient of 22.0 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup> was obtained from the analysis and this was lower than the 29 mg/kg BW·d<sup>−1</sup> value that has been commonly used in the literature. In conclusion, the coefficient varied among cows, likely because BW does not represent muscle mass. Therefore, caution is needed when urine output is estimated using a fixed coefficient in an experiment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 508-512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尿中肌酐浓度常被用来估计奶牛的尿量。研究通常使用一个固定的系数来衡量肌酐排泄率,尽管这个系数在不同的研究中有所不同。然而,29 mg/kg BW·d - 1是最普遍的值。目前的研究确定了单个奶牛的肌酐排泄率系数,并验证了使用固定系数来估计尿量。进行2个试验,每个试验8头奶牛。实验采用4 × 4拉丁方重复设计。在试验1中,按2 × 2因子安排,饲粮中添加2个水平的RDP,并添加或不添加异酸。试验2在2个水平的DCAD基础上添加饱和脂肪酸或蛋氨酸类似物,饲喂奶牛。在每个周期的多个天内收集总尿液,然后连续2天在喂食前测量体重。每日尿液亚样本按奶牛和月经组成,测定肌酐浓度。肌酸酐排泄率系数采用奶牛日尿肌酸酐排泄量(mg/d)除以个体体重计算。每个试验的数据采用SAS的MIXED程序进行分析,其中包括周期、日粮及其相互作用的固定效应和奶牛的平方内随机效应。采用SAS的MIXED程序对两个实验的数据进行组合分析,其中试验中奶牛和试验期间为随机效应,试验为固定效应。试验周期和饲粮处理不影响总尿肌酐排泄量和试验系数,但影响产奶量和体重。两组间DMI和产奶量无显著差异,但体重差异较大(672 vs 746 kg)。试验2的尿肌酐排泄量(12.8 vs. 17.8 g/d)和系数(19.1 vs. 23.9 mg/kg BW·d−1)均高于试验1。采用SAS的MIXED程序对体重与尿肌酐排泄量进行线性回归分析(实验为随机效应)。分析得出的系数为22.0 mg/kg BW·d - 1,低于文献中常用的29 mg/kg BW·d - 1。综上所述,该系数在奶牛之间存在差异,可能是因为体重不代表肌肉质量。因此,在实验中使用固定系数估计尿量时需要谨慎。
Assessing the use of urinary creatinine excretion rate to estimate urine output in lactating cows
Creatinine concentration in urine is often used to estimate urine output in cows. Studies have commonly used a fixed coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate, although this coefficient varies among studies. However, 29 mg/kg BW·d−1 is the most popular value. The current study determined the coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate of individual cows and validated the use of a fixed coefficient to estimate urine output. Two experiments were conducted with 8 cows in each experiment. The experiments were conducted in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design. In experiment 1, dietary treatments were 2 levels of RDP with or without isoacids supplementation in 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. In experiment 2, diets at 2 levels of DCAD supplemented with saturated fatty acids or a Met analog were fed to cows as dietary treatments. Total urine was collected over multiple days in each period, followed by BW measurements before feeding on 2 consecutive days. Daily subsamples of urine were composited by cow and period and assayed for creatinine concentration. The coefficient for the creatinine excretion rate was calculated by daily urine creatinine excretion (mg/d) divided by BW for individual cows. Data from each experiment were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, where fixed effects of period, diet, and their interaction and random effects of cow within square were included. Additionally, data from both experiments were combined and analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, where cow within trial and period within trial were random effects and trial was the fixed effect. The experimental period and dietary treatments did not affect total urinary creatinine excretion or the coefficient within each experiment, although the periods influenced milk yield and BW. There was no difference in DMI and milk yield between the experiments, but BW differed (672 vs. 746 kg). In addition, urinary creatinine excretion (12.8 vs. 17.8 g/d) and the coefficient (19.1 vs. 23.9 mg/kg BW·d−1) were greater in experiment 2 compared with experiment 1. A linear regression analysis between BW and urinary creatinine excretion was conducted using the MIXED procedure of SAS (experiment as a random effect). The coefficient of 22.0 mg/kg BW·d−1 was obtained from the analysis and this was lower than the 29 mg/kg BW·d−1 value that has been commonly used in the literature. In conclusion, the coefficient varied among cows, likely because BW does not represent muscle mass. Therefore, caution is needed when urine output is estimated using a fixed coefficient in an experiment.