{"title":"轨道交通可达性满意度效应的再评估:地方视角与网络视角的比较","authors":"Yanwen Yun , Jingtong Zhai","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2025.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have linked public transport accessibility to travel satisfaction, but most focus on local accessibility effects, with limited research comparing these to network accessibility effects. Using data from the Beijing Rail Transit System (BRTS) and a large-scale household satisfaction survey, this study applies a Bayesian multilevel approach to examine and compare the impacts of local and network rail transit accessibility on travel satisfaction. We also explore the nonlinear nature of this relationship and the influence of rail transit configurations. The results show that: 1) Both local and network accessibility have significant effects on travel satisfaction, including for commuting and non-commuting trips. Local accessibility has a stronger impact than network accessibility. 2) The effect is nonlinear, peaking at the fourth quintile, and from the second quintile onward, local accessibility has a clearly stronger positive effect than network accessibility. 3) Residents near ring lines or non-transfer stations tend to benefit more from accessibility improvements. These findings suggest that urban planners and policymakers should evaluate transit investments based on network accessibility beyond just station areas, while accounting for threshold effects and rail network design to promote transport equity and overall welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluating the satisfaction effects of rail transit accessibility: A comparison of local and network perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Yanwen Yun , Jingtong Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2025.100131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous studies have linked public transport accessibility to travel satisfaction, but most focus on local accessibility effects, with limited research comparing these to network accessibility effects. Using data from the Beijing Rail Transit System (BRTS) and a large-scale household satisfaction survey, this study applies a Bayesian multilevel approach to examine and compare the impacts of local and network rail transit accessibility on travel satisfaction. We also explore the nonlinear nature of this relationship and the influence of rail transit configurations. The results show that: 1) Both local and network accessibility have significant effects on travel satisfaction, including for commuting and non-commuting trips. Local accessibility has a stronger impact than network accessibility. 2) The effect is nonlinear, peaking at the fourth quintile, and from the second quintile onward, local accessibility has a clearly stronger positive effect than network accessibility. 3) Residents near ring lines or non-transfer stations tend to benefit more from accessibility improvements. These findings suggest that urban planners and policymakers should evaluate transit investments based on network accessibility beyond just station areas, while accounting for threshold effects and rail network design to promote transport equity and overall welfare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X25000165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X25000165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Re-evaluating the satisfaction effects of rail transit accessibility: A comparison of local and network perspectives
Previous studies have linked public transport accessibility to travel satisfaction, but most focus on local accessibility effects, with limited research comparing these to network accessibility effects. Using data from the Beijing Rail Transit System (BRTS) and a large-scale household satisfaction survey, this study applies a Bayesian multilevel approach to examine and compare the impacts of local and network rail transit accessibility on travel satisfaction. We also explore the nonlinear nature of this relationship and the influence of rail transit configurations. The results show that: 1) Both local and network accessibility have significant effects on travel satisfaction, including for commuting and non-commuting trips. Local accessibility has a stronger impact than network accessibility. 2) The effect is nonlinear, peaking at the fourth quintile, and from the second quintile onward, local accessibility has a clearly stronger positive effect than network accessibility. 3) Residents near ring lines or non-transfer stations tend to benefit more from accessibility improvements. These findings suggest that urban planners and policymakers should evaluate transit investments based on network accessibility beyond just station areas, while accounting for threshold effects and rail network design to promote transport equity and overall welfare.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.