Jonas Enqvist , L. Joakim Holmberg , Michael Skipper Andersen , Anton Arndt
{"title":"地面反作用力的不对称性低估了膝关节反作用力的不对称性","authors":"Jonas Enqvist , L. Joakim Holmberg , Michael Skipper Andersen , Anton Arndt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inter-limb asymmetry in function or performance is an external measure used in sports science and medicine assessing readiness. How asymmetries propagate and affect internal joint loading is, however, poorly understood. This study presents the first investigation of asymmetries in ground reaction forces and knee joint reaction forces during a countermovement jump. Eleven uninjured male participants performed three countermovement jumps. Forces and motion were analysed in the Anybody Modelling System. Total resultant knee joint reaction force (KJRF[R]) was six times higher than the total resultant ground reaction force (GRF[R]) and the magnitude of the interlimb asymmetry was 6.6 times higher for KJRF[R] than GRF[R] indicating a significantly (p < 0.05) higher load in the joint structures of the dominant knee than the non-dominant knee. KJRF[AP] reached 1743 ± 556(877–2910) N in the posterior direction at a knee angle of 105°, representing a load carried solely by the passive structures of the knee together with the articular contact surfaces. Even a small asymmetry determined through external measures such as GRF, therefore had a high impact on joint loading. Previously used thresholds (10 % deficit) for return to sport may therefore be questioned, and lower thresholds may be relevant to prevent injuries in the dominant limb.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 112834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ground reaction force asymmetry underestimates asymmetries in knee joint reaction forces during countermovement jumps\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Enqvist , L. Joakim Holmberg , Michael Skipper Andersen , Anton Arndt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Inter-limb asymmetry in function or performance is an external measure used in sports science and medicine assessing readiness. How asymmetries propagate and affect internal joint loading is, however, poorly understood. This study presents the first investigation of asymmetries in ground reaction forces and knee joint reaction forces during a countermovement jump. Eleven uninjured male participants performed three countermovement jumps. Forces and motion were analysed in the Anybody Modelling System. Total resultant knee joint reaction force (KJRF[R]) was six times higher than the total resultant ground reaction force (GRF[R]) and the magnitude of the interlimb asymmetry was 6.6 times higher for KJRF[R] than GRF[R] indicating a significantly (p < 0.05) higher load in the joint structures of the dominant knee than the non-dominant knee. KJRF[AP] reached 1743 ± 556(877–2910) N in the posterior direction at a knee angle of 105°, representing a load carried solely by the passive structures of the knee together with the articular contact surfaces. Even a small asymmetry determined through external measures such as GRF, therefore had a high impact on joint loading. Previously used thresholds (10 % deficit) for return to sport may therefore be questioned, and lower thresholds may be relevant to prevent injuries in the dominant limb.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500346X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500346X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ground reaction force asymmetry underestimates asymmetries in knee joint reaction forces during countermovement jumps
Inter-limb asymmetry in function or performance is an external measure used in sports science and medicine assessing readiness. How asymmetries propagate and affect internal joint loading is, however, poorly understood. This study presents the first investigation of asymmetries in ground reaction forces and knee joint reaction forces during a countermovement jump. Eleven uninjured male participants performed three countermovement jumps. Forces and motion were analysed in the Anybody Modelling System. Total resultant knee joint reaction force (KJRF[R]) was six times higher than the total resultant ground reaction force (GRF[R]) and the magnitude of the interlimb asymmetry was 6.6 times higher for KJRF[R] than GRF[R] indicating a significantly (p < 0.05) higher load in the joint structures of the dominant knee than the non-dominant knee. KJRF[AP] reached 1743 ± 556(877–2910) N in the posterior direction at a knee angle of 105°, representing a load carried solely by the passive structures of the knee together with the articular contact surfaces. Even a small asymmetry determined through external measures such as GRF, therefore had a high impact on joint loading. Previously used thresholds (10 % deficit) for return to sport may therefore be questioned, and lower thresholds may be relevant to prevent injuries in the dominant limb.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.