Jinle Yu , Hongjun Chen , Miaomiao Wang , Jiachi Bao , Wenyi Song , Xitong He , Wenhai Shi
{"title":"中国不同植被类型坡面尺度径流预测的修正曲线数法","authors":"Jinle Yu , Hongjun Chen , Miaomiao Wang , Jiachi Bao , Wenyi Song , Xitong He , Wenhai Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is widely used to estimate surface runoff, relying on the Curve Number (<em>CN</em>) from the SCS handbook. However, its reliance on three discrete hydrologic condition (HC) categories (e.g., good, fair, poor) reduces sensitivity to land surface variability, leading to abrupt <em>CN</em> changes and inconsistent runoff estimates. To enhance <em>CN</em> estimation accuracy, this study assessed <em>CN</em> values for each HC using the median (CN <em>_</em>C) and least-squares fit (CN <em>_</em>F) methods based on rainfall-runoff observations from 65 monitoring sites across China. Although CN <em>_</em>F slightly improved CN estimation, it still resulted in unsatisfactory performance, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values below 60 % under many HC conditions, highlighting the limitations of categorical HC classification and internal <em>CN</em> variability. To address this, the study developed three equations integrating <em>CN</em> values with tabulated <em>CN</em> values for bare soil and vegetation coverage, tailored to grassland, shrubland, and woodland ecosystems. This method was calibrated and validated using data from 58 sites and tested at 7 independent sites. Results showed marked improvements in runoff prediction accuracy: for calibration, <em>NSE</em> values increased from 60.55 % (original method) to 78.57 % for grassland, from 58.51 % to 82.90 % for shrubland, and from –21.20–64.39 % for woodland. Similar improvements were observed in validation, with <em>NSE</em> increasing from 61.78 % to 79.11 % for grassland, 57.46–81.28 % for shrubland, and –43.68–62.71 % for woodland. These findings demonstrate the superior performance and broader applicability of the proposed method for runoff prediction in China’s diverse vegetated landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106737"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified curve number method for runoff prediction of different vegetation types at the slope scale in China\",\"authors\":\"Jinle Yu , Hongjun Chen , Miaomiao Wang , Jiachi Bao , Wenyi Song , Xitong He , Wenhai Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is widely used to estimate surface runoff, relying on the Curve Number (<em>CN</em>) from the SCS handbook. However, its reliance on three discrete hydrologic condition (HC) categories (e.g., good, fair, poor) reduces sensitivity to land surface variability, leading to abrupt <em>CN</em> changes and inconsistent runoff estimates. To enhance <em>CN</em> estimation accuracy, this study assessed <em>CN</em> values for each HC using the median (CN <em>_</em>C) and least-squares fit (CN <em>_</em>F) methods based on rainfall-runoff observations from 65 monitoring sites across China. Although CN <em>_</em>F slightly improved CN estimation, it still resulted in unsatisfactory performance, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values below 60 % under many HC conditions, highlighting the limitations of categorical HC classification and internal <em>CN</em> variability. To address this, the study developed three equations integrating <em>CN</em> values with tabulated <em>CN</em> values for bare soil and vegetation coverage, tailored to grassland, shrubland, and woodland ecosystems. This method was calibrated and validated using data from 58 sites and tested at 7 independent sites. Results showed marked improvements in runoff prediction accuracy: for calibration, <em>NSE</em> values increased from 60.55 % (original method) to 78.57 % for grassland, from 58.51 % to 82.90 % for shrubland, and from –21.20–64.39 % for woodland. Similar improvements were observed in validation, with <em>NSE</em> increasing from 61.78 % to 79.11 % for grassland, 57.46–81.28 % for shrubland, and –43.68–62.71 % for woodland. These findings demonstrate the superior performance and broader applicability of the proposed method for runoff prediction in China’s diverse vegetated landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002910\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002910","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A modified curve number method for runoff prediction of different vegetation types at the slope scale in China
The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is widely used to estimate surface runoff, relying on the Curve Number (CN) from the SCS handbook. However, its reliance on three discrete hydrologic condition (HC) categories (e.g., good, fair, poor) reduces sensitivity to land surface variability, leading to abrupt CN changes and inconsistent runoff estimates. To enhance CN estimation accuracy, this study assessed CN values for each HC using the median (CN _C) and least-squares fit (CN _F) methods based on rainfall-runoff observations from 65 monitoring sites across China. Although CN _F slightly improved CN estimation, it still resulted in unsatisfactory performance, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values below 60 % under many HC conditions, highlighting the limitations of categorical HC classification and internal CN variability. To address this, the study developed three equations integrating CN values with tabulated CN values for bare soil and vegetation coverage, tailored to grassland, shrubland, and woodland ecosystems. This method was calibrated and validated using data from 58 sites and tested at 7 independent sites. Results showed marked improvements in runoff prediction accuracy: for calibration, NSE values increased from 60.55 % (original method) to 78.57 % for grassland, from 58.51 % to 82.90 % for shrubland, and from –21.20–64.39 % for woodland. Similar improvements were observed in validation, with NSE increasing from 61.78 % to 79.11 % for grassland, 57.46–81.28 % for shrubland, and –43.68–62.71 % for woodland. These findings demonstrate the superior performance and broader applicability of the proposed method for runoff prediction in China’s diverse vegetated landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.