东西方可持续发展空间溢出效应设计:综合可持续视角分析

IF 7.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jian Li , Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee
{"title":"东西方可持续发展空间溢出效应设计:综合可持续视角分析","authors":"Jian Li ,&nbsp;Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee","doi":"10.1016/j.gr.2025.05.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are various perspectives of sustainability, including integrated sustainability, weak sustainability, and strong sustainability, complicating the understanding of the perspective fitting the socioeconomic characteristics of each group of countries. To address this research gap, the main objective of the study is to examine the three perspectives of sustainability across the US, China, and Indonesia to reveal their most dominant sustainability perspective. To this end, it maps the spatial spillovers of sustainability pillars, including social, environment, and economy, within the sample countries. For this mapping, this approach estimates the sustainability elasticities using the SEY model, which involves the Vector Autoregression (VAR), simultaneous equations system, and causal examination, within 1974–2020. The results indicate that the elasticities of sustainability are mainly high and synergistic, meaning that the sustainability pillars mainly have considerable and synergistic spillover effects. This finding accepts the integrated sustainability while refusing the perspectives of strong and weak sustainability. Moreover, the findings denote that the flowing patten of spillovers have a spatially symmetric distribution between the US and China, attaching equal importance to the relationships with the western and eastern economies of the world. The theoretical implication of the findings is that they introduce spillovers as the 4th dimension of sustainability, completing the three classical dimensions of economy, environment, and social in the context of the weak and strong perspective of sustainability. From the perspective of policy recommendation, the findings suggest decision-makers in Indonesia to promote peaceful, strong, and balanced ties with the great economic powers in the west and the east like the US and China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12761,"journal":{"name":"Gondwana Research","volume":"147 ","pages":"Pages 66-79"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing the spatial spillovers of sustainable development between the eastern and western countries: Analyzing the integrated sustainability perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jian Li ,&nbsp;Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gr.2025.05.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There are various perspectives of sustainability, including integrated sustainability, weak sustainability, and strong sustainability, complicating the understanding of the perspective fitting the socioeconomic characteristics of each group of countries. To address this research gap, the main objective of the study is to examine the three perspectives of sustainability across the US, China, and Indonesia to reveal their most dominant sustainability perspective. To this end, it maps the spatial spillovers of sustainability pillars, including social, environment, and economy, within the sample countries. For this mapping, this approach estimates the sustainability elasticities using the SEY model, which involves the Vector Autoregression (VAR), simultaneous equations system, and causal examination, within 1974–2020. The results indicate that the elasticities of sustainability are mainly high and synergistic, meaning that the sustainability pillars mainly have considerable and synergistic spillover effects. This finding accepts the integrated sustainability while refusing the perspectives of strong and weak sustainability. Moreover, the findings denote that the flowing patten of spillovers have a spatially symmetric distribution between the US and China, attaching equal importance to the relationships with the western and eastern economies of the world. The theoretical implication of the findings is that they introduce spillovers as the 4th dimension of sustainability, completing the three classical dimensions of economy, environment, and social in the context of the weak and strong perspective of sustainability. From the perspective of policy recommendation, the findings suggest decision-makers in Indonesia to promote peaceful, strong, and balanced ties with the great economic powers in the west and the east like the US and China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 66-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gondwana Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X25001911\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gondwana Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X25001911","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续性有多种观点,包括综合可持续性、弱可持续性和强可持续性,这使得对符合每一组国家社会经济特征的观点的理解复杂化。为了解决这一研究差距,本研究的主要目的是研究美国、中国和印度尼西亚的三种可持续性观点,以揭示它们最主要的可持续性观点。为此,它绘制了样本国家内可持续性支柱(包括社会、环境和经济)的空间溢出效应图。对于这种映射,该方法使用SEY模型估计了1974-2020年间的可持续性弹性,该模型涉及向量自回归(VAR)、联立方程组和因果检验。结果表明,可持续发展的弹性主要表现为高弹性和协同效应,即可持续发展支柱主要具有显著的协同溢出效应。这一发现接受了综合可持续性,拒绝了强可持续性和弱可持续性的观点。此外,研究结果表明,溢出效应的流动模式在中美之间具有空间对称分布,与世界东西方经济体的关系同等重要。这一发现的理论意义在于,他们将溢出作为可持续性的第四个维度,在可持续性的弱和强视角背景下完成了经济、环境和社会三个经典维度。从政策建议的角度来看,研究结果建议印度尼西亚的决策者促进与美国和中国等西方和东方经济大国的和平,强大和平衡的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Designing the spatial spillovers of sustainable development between the eastern and western countries: Analyzing the integrated sustainability perspective

Designing the spatial spillovers of sustainable development between the eastern and western countries: Analyzing the integrated sustainability perspective
There are various perspectives of sustainability, including integrated sustainability, weak sustainability, and strong sustainability, complicating the understanding of the perspective fitting the socioeconomic characteristics of each group of countries. To address this research gap, the main objective of the study is to examine the three perspectives of sustainability across the US, China, and Indonesia to reveal their most dominant sustainability perspective. To this end, it maps the spatial spillovers of sustainability pillars, including social, environment, and economy, within the sample countries. For this mapping, this approach estimates the sustainability elasticities using the SEY model, which involves the Vector Autoregression (VAR), simultaneous equations system, and causal examination, within 1974–2020. The results indicate that the elasticities of sustainability are mainly high and synergistic, meaning that the sustainability pillars mainly have considerable and synergistic spillover effects. This finding accepts the integrated sustainability while refusing the perspectives of strong and weak sustainability. Moreover, the findings denote that the flowing patten of spillovers have a spatially symmetric distribution between the US and China, attaching equal importance to the relationships with the western and eastern economies of the world. The theoretical implication of the findings is that they introduce spillovers as the 4th dimension of sustainability, completing the three classical dimensions of economy, environment, and social in the context of the weak and strong perspective of sustainability. From the perspective of policy recommendation, the findings suggest decision-makers in Indonesia to promote peaceful, strong, and balanced ties with the great economic powers in the west and the east like the US and China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gondwana Research
Gondwana Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
298
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Gondwana Research (GR) is an International Journal aimed to promote high quality research publications on all topics related to solid Earth, particularly with reference to the origin and evolution of continents, continental assemblies and their resources. GR is an "all earth science" journal with no restrictions on geological time, terrane or theme and covers a wide spectrum of topics in geosciences such as geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, structure, petrology, geochemistry, stable isotopes, geochronology, economic geology, exploration geology, engineering geology, geophysics, and environmental geology among other themes, and provides an appropriate forum to integrate studies from different disciplines and different terrains. In addition to regular articles and thematic issues, the journal invites high profile state-of-the-art reviews on thrust area topics for its column, ''GR FOCUS''. Focus articles include short biographies and photographs of the authors. Short articles (within ten printed pages) for rapid publication reporting important discoveries or innovative models of global interest will be considered under the category ''GR LETTERS''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信