修复政治分歧中的认知扭曲

IF 16.7 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Luiza A. Santos, Catherine Garton, Jamil Zaki
{"title":"修复政治分歧中的认知扭曲","authors":"Luiza A. Santos, Catherine Garton, Jamil Zaki","doi":"10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political animosity is on the rise, undermining both well-being and collective responses to global challenges. Interventions to decrease animosity and division often fail to yield lasting, generalized benefits. Drawing on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and new empirical evidence, we argue that entrenched political conflicts are laden with cognitive distortions similar to those observed in clinical contexts. We propose that, by adapting CBT insights to political settings, interventionists can complement and enhance current depolarizing efforts. We provide suggestions for how future efforts should equip individuals to recognize and correct biased thinking outside of the laboratory, offering a pathway toward durably mitigating division and hostility.","PeriodicalId":49417,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repairing cognitive distortions in political divides\",\"authors\":\"Luiza A. Santos, Catherine Garton, Jamil Zaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political animosity is on the rise, undermining both well-being and collective responses to global challenges. Interventions to decrease animosity and division often fail to yield lasting, generalized benefits. Drawing on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and new empirical evidence, we argue that entrenched political conflicts are laden with cognitive distortions similar to those observed in clinical contexts. We propose that, by adapting CBT insights to political settings, interventionists can complement and enhance current depolarizing efforts. We provide suggestions for how future efforts should equip individuals to recognize and correct biased thinking outside of the laboratory, offering a pathway toward durably mitigating division and hostility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Cognitive Sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Cognitive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Cognitive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治仇恨正在上升,这既破坏了福祉,也破坏了对全球挑战的集体应对。减少敌意和分裂的干预措施往往不能产生持久的、普遍的好处。利用认知行为疗法(CBT)和新的经验证据,我们认为根深蒂固的政治冲突充满了类似于临床环境中观察到的认知扭曲。我们建议,通过将认知行为疗法的见解与政治环境相结合,干预主义者可以补充和加强当前去极化的努力。我们为未来的努力提供了建议,使个人能够在实验室之外识别和纠正偏见思维,为持久减轻分裂和敌意提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repairing cognitive distortions in political divides
Political animosity is on the rise, undermining both well-being and collective responses to global challenges. Interventions to decrease animosity and division often fail to yield lasting, generalized benefits. Drawing on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and new empirical evidence, we argue that entrenched political conflicts are laden with cognitive distortions similar to those observed in clinical contexts. We propose that, by adapting CBT insights to political settings, interventionists can complement and enhance current depolarizing efforts. We provide suggestions for how future efforts should equip individuals to recognize and correct biased thinking outside of the laboratory, offering a pathway toward durably mitigating division and hostility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
27.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Essential reading for those working directly in the cognitive sciences or in related specialist areas, Trends in Cognitive Sciences provides an instant overview of current thinking for scientists, students and teachers who want to keep up with the latest developments in the cognitive sciences. The journal brings together research in psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, philosophy, computer science and neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences provides a platform for the interaction of these disciplines and the evolution of cognitive science as an independent field of study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信