{"title":"团队共识与包容氛围对初级审核员符合性与风险评估分担的影响","authors":"Eddy Cardinaels , Viola Darmawan , Evelien Reusen , Kristof Stouthuysen","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In hierarchically structured audit teams, it is common for junior auditors to conduct the fieldwork and gather a large part of the audit evidence, making information sharing critical. However, if a team consensus already exists, individual auditors may conform to the team and hesitate to raise potentially important issues they themselves acquired about a client. This study experimentally investigates how the origin of team consensus (i.e., consensus of junior members vs. consensus of senior members) and the type of inclusive climate (i.e., authenticity vs. belongingness) impact junior auditors’ conformity and their comfort with sharing their own risk assessment with the team. Drawing on conformity theory, we hypothesize and find that junior auditors are more likely to conform to a team consensus of senior members, and feel less comfortable with sharing their own risk assessment with the team, particularly when working in an authenticity climate. These effects of conforming more to senior members are mitigated when there is a climate of belongingness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 107334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of team consensus and inclusive climate on junior auditors’ conformity and risk assessment sharing\",\"authors\":\"Eddy Cardinaels , Viola Darmawan , Evelien Reusen , Kristof Stouthuysen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In hierarchically structured audit teams, it is common for junior auditors to conduct the fieldwork and gather a large part of the audit evidence, making information sharing critical. However, if a team consensus already exists, individual auditors may conform to the team and hesitate to raise potentially important issues they themselves acquired about a client. This study experimentally investigates how the origin of team consensus (i.e., consensus of junior members vs. consensus of senior members) and the type of inclusive climate (i.e., authenticity vs. belongingness) impact junior auditors’ conformity and their comfort with sharing their own risk assessment with the team. Drawing on conformity theory, we hypothesize and find that junior auditors are more likely to conform to a team consensus of senior members, and feel less comfortable with sharing their own risk assessment with the team, particularly when working in an authenticity climate. These effects of conforming more to senior members are mitigated when there is a climate of belongingness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425425000535\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425425000535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The influence of team consensus and inclusive climate on junior auditors’ conformity and risk assessment sharing
In hierarchically structured audit teams, it is common for junior auditors to conduct the fieldwork and gather a large part of the audit evidence, making information sharing critical. However, if a team consensus already exists, individual auditors may conform to the team and hesitate to raise potentially important issues they themselves acquired about a client. This study experimentally investigates how the origin of team consensus (i.e., consensus of junior members vs. consensus of senior members) and the type of inclusive climate (i.e., authenticity vs. belongingness) impact junior auditors’ conformity and their comfort with sharing their own risk assessment with the team. Drawing on conformity theory, we hypothesize and find that junior auditors are more likely to conform to a team consensus of senior members, and feel less comfortable with sharing their own risk assessment with the team, particularly when working in an authenticity climate. These effects of conforming more to senior members are mitigated when there is a climate of belongingness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.