{"title":"消费者对氢燃料电池汽车采用的偏好:一项离散选择调查","authors":"Yuyao Liu , Ying Li , Kunhui Ye , Xingjun Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The hydrogen economy, driven by the promotion of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs), is emerging as the key to the electrification of transportation. Despite this, consumers remain hesitant, facing a dilemma where HFCVs have not yet decisively influenced their purchasing preferences. The complex market landscape and policy nuances also contribute to consumer decision-making uncertainty. Using a Discrete Choice Model combining Multinomial Logit and Latent Class Cluster Analysis, we analyzed 1077 survey responses from Chongqing, China, identifying four consumer groups based on perceived value and risk (“LH,” “HH,” “LL,” “HL”). Key findings show that drivable range, refueling accessibility, and personal carbon credits (PCC) enhance HFCV competitiveness. Hydrogen station accessibility boosts preferences for “LL” group, while PCC mainly influences “HH” consumers. Toll exemptions attract high-risk-perception groups, and mileage subsidies benefit vulnerable groups like “LL.” Targeted policies are essential to address diverse consumer needs and accelerate HFCV adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104892"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer preferences for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles adoption: A discrete choice survey\",\"authors\":\"Yuyao Liu , Ying Li , Kunhui Ye , Xingjun Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The hydrogen economy, driven by the promotion of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs), is emerging as the key to the electrification of transportation. Despite this, consumers remain hesitant, facing a dilemma where HFCVs have not yet decisively influenced their purchasing preferences. The complex market landscape and policy nuances also contribute to consumer decision-making uncertainty. Using a Discrete Choice Model combining Multinomial Logit and Latent Class Cluster Analysis, we analyzed 1077 survey responses from Chongqing, China, identifying four consumer groups based on perceived value and risk (“LH,” “HH,” “LL,” “HL”). Key findings show that drivable range, refueling accessibility, and personal carbon credits (PCC) enhance HFCV competitiveness. Hydrogen station accessibility boosts preferences for “LL” group, while PCC mainly influences “HH” consumers. Toll exemptions attract high-risk-perception groups, and mileage subsidies benefit vulnerable groups like “LL.” Targeted policies are essential to address diverse consumer needs and accelerate HFCV adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consumer preferences for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles adoption: A discrete choice survey
The hydrogen economy, driven by the promotion of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs), is emerging as the key to the electrification of transportation. Despite this, consumers remain hesitant, facing a dilemma where HFCVs have not yet decisively influenced their purchasing preferences. The complex market landscape and policy nuances also contribute to consumer decision-making uncertainty. Using a Discrete Choice Model combining Multinomial Logit and Latent Class Cluster Analysis, we analyzed 1077 survey responses from Chongqing, China, identifying four consumer groups based on perceived value and risk (“LH,” “HH,” “LL,” “HL”). Key findings show that drivable range, refueling accessibility, and personal carbon credits (PCC) enhance HFCV competitiveness. Hydrogen station accessibility boosts preferences for “LL” group, while PCC mainly influences “HH” consumers. Toll exemptions attract high-risk-perception groups, and mileage subsidies benefit vulnerable groups like “LL.” Targeted policies are essential to address diverse consumer needs and accelerate HFCV adoption.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.