{"title":"电池在日前和日内电力市场的盈利能力:具有内生价格的运营策略评估","authors":"Arjen T. Veenstra, Machiel Mulder","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Batteries can support future electricity systems by assisting price arbitrage in electricity markets, enhancing self-consumption, and providing ancillary services. Determining the profitability of price arbitrage , i.e. charge at low prices and discharge at high prices., requires evaluating the strategy that is used to benefit from future price fluctuations, and considering its impact on prices. This study examines battery profitability based on price arbitrage in day-ahead and intraday auction markets, where both temporal price differences within markets and price differences between markets are exploited. This is done with an electricity-market model, calibrated on historical Dutch bid-curve data, which estimates the impact of battery bids on market equilibria. We compare profits under perfect foresight with a strategy where the storage operator has perfect foresight of prices but ignores the own effect on prices, and two simpler historical-data-based strategies. It appears that the latter type of simpler strategies can result in profitable operations in case of small battery capacity, and that most profits can be made in the intraday market. However, when battery capacity increases, profitability declines, especially in the intraday market, due to lower market volumes. Increased battery capacity also calls for more advanced operation strategies, as historical price patterns may no longer predict future prices accurately. Even in a year with high price volatility as in 2023, with perfect foresight of prices and 60% lower battery costs, no more than 15% of Dutch households with solar panels can profitably invest in home batteries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108608"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profitability of batteries in day-ahead and intraday electricity markets: Assessment of operation strategies with endogenous prices\",\"authors\":\"Arjen T. Veenstra, Machiel Mulder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Batteries can support future electricity systems by assisting price arbitrage in electricity markets, enhancing self-consumption, and providing ancillary services. Determining the profitability of price arbitrage , i.e. charge at low prices and discharge at high prices., requires evaluating the strategy that is used to benefit from future price fluctuations, and considering its impact on prices. This study examines battery profitability based on price arbitrage in day-ahead and intraday auction markets, where both temporal price differences within markets and price differences between markets are exploited. This is done with an electricity-market model, calibrated on historical Dutch bid-curve data, which estimates the impact of battery bids on market equilibria. We compare profits under perfect foresight with a strategy where the storage operator has perfect foresight of prices but ignores the own effect on prices, and two simpler historical-data-based strategies. It appears that the latter type of simpler strategies can result in profitable operations in case of small battery capacity, and that most profits can be made in the intraday market. However, when battery capacity increases, profitability declines, especially in the intraday market, due to lower market volumes. Increased battery capacity also calls for more advanced operation strategies, as historical price patterns may no longer predict future prices accurately. Even in a year with high price volatility as in 2023, with perfect foresight of prices and 60% lower battery costs, no more than 15% of Dutch households with solar panels can profitably invest in home batteries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004359\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004359","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Profitability of batteries in day-ahead and intraday electricity markets: Assessment of operation strategies with endogenous prices
Batteries can support future electricity systems by assisting price arbitrage in electricity markets, enhancing self-consumption, and providing ancillary services. Determining the profitability of price arbitrage , i.e. charge at low prices and discharge at high prices., requires evaluating the strategy that is used to benefit from future price fluctuations, and considering its impact on prices. This study examines battery profitability based on price arbitrage in day-ahead and intraday auction markets, where both temporal price differences within markets and price differences between markets are exploited. This is done with an electricity-market model, calibrated on historical Dutch bid-curve data, which estimates the impact of battery bids on market equilibria. We compare profits under perfect foresight with a strategy where the storage operator has perfect foresight of prices but ignores the own effect on prices, and two simpler historical-data-based strategies. It appears that the latter type of simpler strategies can result in profitable operations in case of small battery capacity, and that most profits can be made in the intraday market. However, when battery capacity increases, profitability declines, especially in the intraday market, due to lower market volumes. Increased battery capacity also calls for more advanced operation strategies, as historical price patterns may no longer predict future prices accurately. Even in a year with high price volatility as in 2023, with perfect foresight of prices and 60% lower battery costs, no more than 15% of Dutch households with solar panels can profitably invest in home batteries.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.