症状夸大及其治疗后果

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Harald Merckelbach, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald
{"title":"症状夸大及其治疗后果","authors":"Harald Merckelbach, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review examines the effects of patients overreporting symptoms, which can be identified through validity tests. Such overreporting may reflect concerns about being denied care, difficulty describing experiences, or pursuit of external incentives. Regardless of the reason, it has meaningful clinical implications. Research shows links between overreporting and lower treatment adherence, higher dropout rates, and challenges in building strong therapeutic relationships. When clinicians cannot fully understand the nature or severity of symptoms, misdiagnosis and reduced trust may result. To reduce these risks, it is important to view validity test results as informative and use them to support thoughtful, collaborative conversations with patients and their support networks, ultimately enhancing treatment planning and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"18 1","pages":"102091"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptom Overreporting and Its Consequences for Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Harald Merckelbach, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review examines the effects of patients overreporting symptoms, which can be identified through validity tests. Such overreporting may reflect concerns about being denied care, difficulty describing experiences, or pursuit of external incentives. Regardless of the reason, it has meaningful clinical implications. Research shows links between overreporting and lower treatment adherence, higher dropout rates, and challenges in building strong therapeutic relationships. When clinicians cannot fully understand the nature or severity of symptoms, misdiagnosis and reduced trust may result. To reduce these risks, it is important to view validity test results as informative and use them to support thoughtful, collaborative conversations with patients and their support networks, ultimately enhancing treatment planning and outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"102091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述探讨了患者过度报告症状的影响,这可以通过效度检验来识别。这种过度报告可能反映了对被拒绝治疗、难以描述经历或追求外部激励的担忧。不管原因是什么,它都具有重要的临床意义。研究表明,报告过高与治疗依从性较低、辍学率较高以及建立牢固治疗关系面临的挑战之间存在联系。当临床医生不能完全了解症状的性质或严重程度时,可能会导致误诊和信任度降低。为了减少这些风险,重要的是将效度测试结果视为信息,并利用它们来支持与患者及其支持网络进行深思熟虑的协作对话,最终提高治疗计划和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symptom Overreporting and Its Consequences for Treatment
This review examines the effects of patients overreporting symptoms, which can be identified through validity tests. Such overreporting may reflect concerns about being denied care, difficulty describing experiences, or pursuit of external incentives. Regardless of the reason, it has meaningful clinical implications. Research shows links between overreporting and lower treatment adherence, higher dropout rates, and challenges in building strong therapeutic relationships. When clinicians cannot fully understand the nature or severity of symptoms, misdiagnosis and reduced trust may result. To reduce these risks, it is important to view validity test results as informative and use them to support thoughtful, collaborative conversations with patients and their support networks, ultimately enhancing treatment planning and outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信