{"title":"症状夸大及其治疗后果","authors":"Harald Merckelbach, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review examines the effects of patients overreporting symptoms, which can be identified through validity tests. Such overreporting may reflect concerns about being denied care, difficulty describing experiences, or pursuit of external incentives. Regardless of the reason, it has meaningful clinical implications. Research shows links between overreporting and lower treatment adherence, higher dropout rates, and challenges in building strong therapeutic relationships. When clinicians cannot fully understand the nature or severity of symptoms, misdiagnosis and reduced trust may result. To reduce these risks, it is important to view validity test results as informative and use them to support thoughtful, collaborative conversations with patients and their support networks, ultimately enhancing treatment planning and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"18 1","pages":"102091"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptom Overreporting and Its Consequences for Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Harald Merckelbach, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review examines the effects of patients overreporting symptoms, which can be identified through validity tests. Such overreporting may reflect concerns about being denied care, difficulty describing experiences, or pursuit of external incentives. Regardless of the reason, it has meaningful clinical implications. Research shows links between overreporting and lower treatment adherence, higher dropout rates, and challenges in building strong therapeutic relationships. When clinicians cannot fully understand the nature or severity of symptoms, misdiagnosis and reduced trust may result. To reduce these risks, it is important to view validity test results as informative and use them to support thoughtful, collaborative conversations with patients and their support networks, ultimately enhancing treatment planning and outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"102091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Symptom Overreporting and Its Consequences for Treatment
This review examines the effects of patients overreporting symptoms, which can be identified through validity tests. Such overreporting may reflect concerns about being denied care, difficulty describing experiences, or pursuit of external incentives. Regardless of the reason, it has meaningful clinical implications. Research shows links between overreporting and lower treatment adherence, higher dropout rates, and challenges in building strong therapeutic relationships. When clinicians cannot fully understand the nature or severity of symptoms, misdiagnosis and reduced trust may result. To reduce these risks, it is important to view validity test results as informative and use them to support thoughtful, collaborative conversations with patients and their support networks, ultimately enhancing treatment planning and outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology