{"title":"闪光灯记忆","authors":"Olivier Luminet , Aline Cordonnier","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper reviews the intriguing category of flashbulb memories (FBMs), which are detailed memories of the reception context. After examining the different measures and operationalizations of the construct, we present the arguments in favor and against labeling FBM as a special category of memory. Explanatory models underscore a) the complementary role of cognitive, emotional, and social factors, b) the development of direct versus indirect pathways and c) a temporal distinction between immediate and long-term responses. The paper examines brain underpinnings, applications to clinical groups, and individual differences in age and culture. The links with the collective memory and its interdisciplinary relevance are then developed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102079"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flashbulb memories\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Luminet , Aline Cordonnier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper reviews the intriguing category of flashbulb memories (FBMs), which are detailed memories of the reception context. After examining the different measures and operationalizations of the construct, we present the arguments in favor and against labeling FBM as a special category of memory. Explanatory models underscore a) the complementary role of cognitive, emotional, and social factors, b) the development of direct versus indirect pathways and c) a temporal distinction between immediate and long-term responses. The paper examines brain underpinnings, applications to clinical groups, and individual differences in age and culture. The links with the collective memory and its interdisciplinary relevance are then developed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000922\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper reviews the intriguing category of flashbulb memories (FBMs), which are detailed memories of the reception context. After examining the different measures and operationalizations of the construct, we present the arguments in favor and against labeling FBM as a special category of memory. Explanatory models underscore a) the complementary role of cognitive, emotional, and social factors, b) the development of direct versus indirect pathways and c) a temporal distinction between immediate and long-term responses. The paper examines brain underpinnings, applications to clinical groups, and individual differences in age and culture. The links with the collective memory and its interdisciplinary relevance are then developed.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology