Huseyin Biceroglu, Bilal Bahadir Akbulut, Okan Derin, Ozde Senol Akbulut, Mustafa Serdar Boluk, Nevhis Akinturk, Kadri Emre Caliskan, Cenk Eraslan, Servet Celik, Ahmet Acarer, Taskin Yurtseven
{"title":"使用颅骨机器人引导平台的深部脑刺激引线放置的准确性:初步尸体研究。","authors":"Huseyin Biceroglu, Bilal Bahadir Akbulut, Okan Derin, Ozde Senol Akbulut, Mustafa Serdar Boluk, Nevhis Akinturk, Kadri Emre Caliskan, Cenk Eraslan, Servet Celik, Ahmet Acarer, Taskin Yurtseven","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47419-24.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To measure the deviation rate of a custom 3D-printed Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) lead holder assisted electrode placements from their intended targets, providing a benchmark for the system?s accuracy and paving the way for its use in standard DBS workflows.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted in an experimental lab using a cadaver obtained according to local regulations. Planned electrode trajectories, designed with Medtronic?s DBS surgery planning system, were transferred to the StealthStation Autoguide. A 3D-printed DBS lead holder with integrated navigation fiducials was used to place six electrodes in the targeted brain regions. Pre-operative CT and MRI scans were used for planning, and post-operative imaging confirmed electrode placement. Deviation from planned trajectories was analyzed using Python to assess accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a 30-minute registration and draping process, the median electrode placement time was 22.5 minutes (range: 15-120). The total surgical time for all six electrodes was approximately 5 hours, including imaging, adjustments, and confirmation. The median difference was 1.73 mm (0.03-5.45) on the X-axis, 1.86 mm (0.46-2.74) on the Y-axis, and 1.95 mm (0.73-4.4) on the Z-axis. The median vectorial difference was 2.68 mm (2.3-6.71), while the median trajectory difference was 3.01 mm (1.64-6.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite 50% of leads having a vectorial difference exceeding 4 mm, most had a trajectory difference of less than 3 mm, which could be attributed to the inability to measure the length of the electrode precisely. These results suggest that with minor adjustments, the StealthStation Autoguide could be a cost-effective alternative to similar systems, though further cadaveric studies are necessary to address potential learning curves and random factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"580-586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Placement Using a Cranial Robotic Guidance Platform: A Preliminary Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Huseyin Biceroglu, Bilal Bahadir Akbulut, Okan Derin, Ozde Senol Akbulut, Mustafa Serdar Boluk, Nevhis Akinturk, Kadri Emre Caliskan, Cenk Eraslan, Servet Celik, Ahmet Acarer, Taskin Yurtseven\",\"doi\":\"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47419-24.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To measure the deviation rate of a custom 3D-printed Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) lead holder assisted electrode placements from their intended targets, providing a benchmark for the system?s accuracy and paving the way for its use in standard DBS workflows.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted in an experimental lab using a cadaver obtained according to local regulations. Planned electrode trajectories, designed with Medtronic?s DBS surgery planning system, were transferred to the StealthStation Autoguide. A 3D-printed DBS lead holder with integrated navigation fiducials was used to place six electrodes in the targeted brain regions. Pre-operative CT and MRI scans were used for planning, and post-operative imaging confirmed electrode placement. Deviation from planned trajectories was analyzed using Python to assess accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following a 30-minute registration and draping process, the median electrode placement time was 22.5 minutes (range: 15-120). The total surgical time for all six electrodes was approximately 5 hours, including imaging, adjustments, and confirmation. The median difference was 1.73 mm (0.03-5.45) on the X-axis, 1.86 mm (0.46-2.74) on the Y-axis, and 1.95 mm (0.73-4.4) on the Z-axis. The median vectorial difference was 2.68 mm (2.3-6.71), while the median trajectory difference was 3.01 mm (1.64-6.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite 50% of leads having a vectorial difference exceeding 4 mm, most had a trajectory difference of less than 3 mm, which could be attributed to the inability to measure the length of the electrode precisely. These results suggest that with minor adjustments, the StealthStation Autoguide could be a cost-effective alternative to similar systems, though further cadaveric studies are necessary to address potential learning curves and random factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"580-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47419-24.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.47419-24.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究评估了与StealthStation自动导向器(美敦力公司,都柏林,爱尔兰)一起使用的定制3d打印深部脑刺激(DBS)导联支架在尸体模型中丘脑下核(STN)、内白球(GPi)和腹侧中间核(Vim)中电极放置的有效性。目标是测量放置的电极与预期目标的偏差率,为系统的准确性提供基准,并为其在标准DBS工作流程中的使用铺平道路。材料和方法:本研究在实验室进行,使用一具符合当地规定的尸体。用美敦力DBS手术计划系统设计的电极轨迹被转移到StealthStation自动导航系统中。使用带有集成导航基准的3d打印DBS导线支架将六个电极放置在目标大脑区域。术前CT和MRI扫描用于规划,术后影像学证实电极放置。使用Python分析偏离计划轨迹的情况以评估准确性。结果:经过30分钟的配准和悬垂过程,中位电极放置时间为22.5分钟(范围:15-120分钟)。所有六个电极的总手术时间约为5小时,包括成像、调整和确认。中位差值x轴为1.73 mm (0.03-5.45), y轴为1.86 mm (0.46-2.74), z轴为1.95 mm(0.73-4.4)。中位矢量差为2.68 mm(2.3 ~ 6.71),中位轨迹差为3.01 mm(1.64 ~ 6.63)。结论:尽管50%引线的矢量差超过4毫米,但大多数引线的轨迹差小于3毫米,这可能是由于无法精确测量电极的长度。这些结果表明,尽管需要进一步的尸体研究来解决潜在的学习曲线和随机因素,但只要稍加调整,StealthStation自动导航系统就可以成为类似系统的一种经济高效的替代方案。
Accuracy of Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Placement Using a Cranial Robotic Guidance Platform: A Preliminary Cadaveric Study.
Aim: To measure the deviation rate of a custom 3D-printed Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) lead holder assisted electrode placements from their intended targets, providing a benchmark for the system?s accuracy and paving the way for its use in standard DBS workflows.
Material and methods: The study was conducted in an experimental lab using a cadaver obtained according to local regulations. Planned electrode trajectories, designed with Medtronic?s DBS surgery planning system, were transferred to the StealthStation Autoguide. A 3D-printed DBS lead holder with integrated navigation fiducials was used to place six electrodes in the targeted brain regions. Pre-operative CT and MRI scans were used for planning, and post-operative imaging confirmed electrode placement. Deviation from planned trajectories was analyzed using Python to assess accuracy.
Results: Following a 30-minute registration and draping process, the median electrode placement time was 22.5 minutes (range: 15-120). The total surgical time for all six electrodes was approximately 5 hours, including imaging, adjustments, and confirmation. The median difference was 1.73 mm (0.03-5.45) on the X-axis, 1.86 mm (0.46-2.74) on the Y-axis, and 1.95 mm (0.73-4.4) on the Z-axis. The median vectorial difference was 2.68 mm (2.3-6.71), while the median trajectory difference was 3.01 mm (1.64-6.63).
Conclusion: Despite 50% of leads having a vectorial difference exceeding 4 mm, most had a trajectory difference of less than 3 mm, which could be attributed to the inability to measure the length of the electrode precisely. These results suggest that with minor adjustments, the StealthStation Autoguide could be a cost-effective alternative to similar systems, though further cadaveric studies are necessary to address potential learning curves and random factors.