{"title":"孟德尔阐明:“大科学降临到不起眼的豌豆上。”","authors":"Norman F Weeden","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>News flash: in a recent article by Feng et al., one of Mendel 'factors' is shown not to result in the expected 3:1 segregation ratio, and about half of the traits he investigated are produced by large insertions or deletions. Do genetic textbooks need to be revised?</p>","PeriodicalId":54413,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mendel elucidated: Big Science comes to the humble garden pea.\",\"authors\":\"Norman F Weeden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tig.2025.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>News flash: in a recent article by Feng et al., one of Mendel 'factors' is shown not to result in the expected 3:1 segregation ratio, and about half of the traits he investigated are produced by large insertions or deletions. Do genetic textbooks need to be revised?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2025.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2025.06.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mendel elucidated: Big Science comes to the humble garden pea.
News flash: in a recent article by Feng et al., one of Mendel 'factors' is shown not to result in the expected 3:1 segregation ratio, and about half of the traits he investigated are produced by large insertions or deletions. Do genetic textbooks need to be revised?
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1985, Trends in Genetics swiftly established itself as a "must-read" for geneticists, offering concise, accessible articles covering a spectrum of topics from developmental biology to evolution. This reputation endures, making TiG a cherished resource in the genetic research community. While evolving with the field, the journal now embraces new areas like genomics, epigenetics, and computational genetics, alongside its continued coverage of traditional subjects such as transcriptional regulation, population genetics, and chromosome biology.
Despite expanding its scope, the core objective of TiG remains steadfast: to furnish researchers and students with high-quality, innovative reviews, commentaries, and discussions, fostering an appreciation for advances in genetic research. Each issue of TiG presents lively and up-to-date Reviews and Opinions, alongside shorter articles like Science & Society and Spotlight pieces. Invited from leading researchers, Reviews objectively chronicle recent developments, Opinions provide a forum for debate and hypothesis, and shorter articles explore the intersection of genetics with science and policy, as well as emerging ideas in the field. All articles undergo rigorous peer-review.