睁眼和闭眼静息状态定量脑电图(qEEG)预测深度学习认知障碍的差异。

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chanda Simfukwe, Seong Soo A An, Young Chul Youn
{"title":"睁眼和闭眼静息状态定量脑电图(qEEG)预测深度学习认知障碍的差异。","authors":"Chanda Simfukwe, Seong Soo A An, Young Chul Youn","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2520476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electroencephalography (EEG) is a method that offers detailed observations of electrical activities occurring in the brain's cerebral cortex. The EEG-derived brain signals can serve as a neurophysiological indicator for the early detection of dementia through quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis. This study introduces a deep learning (DL)-based classification approach trained using the difference between qEEG time-frequency (TF) images of eyes-open resting (EOR) and eyes-closed resting (ECR) state EEG to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The dataset comprised 16,910 TF images from 890 subjects, including 269 normal controls (NC), 356 with MCI, and 265 diagnosed with AD. Artifact-free EEG signals were converted into qEEG TF images using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), which captured various event-related alterations within the five (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) EEG frequency sub-bands. EEG data was preprocessed using the EEGlab toolbox version 2022 within the MATLAB R2024a software environment. The preprocessed TF images, along with numerical age data, were used as input features in convolutional neural network (CNN) within a DL framework for classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance metrics of the trained models for EOR - ECR in differentiating NC versus MCI, NC versus AD, and NC versus cognitive impairment (CI) (MCI + AD) classes were assessed using the test dataset from the subjects. The model NC versus CI yielded the best area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 0.95, 0.93, 0.97, and 0.92; NC versus AD was 0.88, 0.88, 0.89, and 0.86; and NC versus MCI was 0.85, 0.83, 0.9, and 0.81, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that using the difference between EOR and ECR qEEG states could be a practical approach to detect cognitive impairment in dementia research with DL. The trained models may serve as a supportive reference for clinicians in the future, not as a diagnostic tool, but as a decision-support system for early diagnosis of cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference between eyes-open and eyes-closed resting state quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) for predicting cognitive impairment using deep learning.\",\"authors\":\"Chanda Simfukwe, Seong Soo A An, Young Chul Youn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2520476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electroencephalography (EEG) is a method that offers detailed observations of electrical activities occurring in the brain's cerebral cortex. The EEG-derived brain signals can serve as a neurophysiological indicator for the early detection of dementia through quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis. This study introduces a deep learning (DL)-based classification approach trained using the difference between qEEG time-frequency (TF) images of eyes-open resting (EOR) and eyes-closed resting (ECR) state EEG to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The dataset comprised 16,910 TF images from 890 subjects, including 269 normal controls (NC), 356 with MCI, and 265 diagnosed with AD. Artifact-free EEG signals were converted into qEEG TF images using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), which captured various event-related alterations within the five (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) EEG frequency sub-bands. EEG data was preprocessed using the EEGlab toolbox version 2022 within the MATLAB R2024a software environment. The preprocessed TF images, along with numerical age data, were used as input features in convolutional neural network (CNN) within a DL framework for classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance metrics of the trained models for EOR - ECR in differentiating NC versus MCI, NC versus AD, and NC versus cognitive impairment (CI) (MCI + AD) classes were assessed using the test dataset from the subjects. The model NC versus CI yielded the best area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 0.95, 0.93, 0.97, and 0.92; NC versus AD was 0.88, 0.88, 0.89, and 0.86; and NC versus MCI was 0.85, 0.83, 0.9, and 0.81, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that using the difference between EOR and ECR qEEG states could be a practical approach to detect cognitive impairment in dementia research with DL. The trained models may serve as a supportive reference for clinicians in the future, not as a diagnostic tool, but as a decision-support system for early diagnosis of cognitive impairment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2520476\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2520476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脑电图(EEG)是一种详细观察大脑皮层电活动的方法。通过定量脑电图(qEEG)分析,脑电图衍生的脑信号可作为早期发现痴呆的神经生理指标。本研究引入了一种基于深度学习(DL)的分类方法,利用睁眼静息(EOR)和闭眼静息(ECR)状态脑电图的qEEG时频(TF)图像之间的差异进行训练,以检测轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)。患者和方法:该数据集包括来自890名受试者的16,910张TF图像,其中包括269名正常对照(NC), 356名MCI患者和265名AD患者。利用快速傅里叶变换(FFT)将无伪影的脑电图信号转换为qEEG TF图像,该图像捕获了五个(delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma)脑电图频率子带内的各种事件相关变化。在MATLAB R2024a软件环境下,使用EEGlab工具箱2022版对EEG数据进行预处理。预处理后的TF图像与数字年龄数据一起作为DL框架内卷积神经网络(CNN)的输入特征进行分类。结果:EOR - ECR训练模型在区分NC与MCI、NC与AD、NC与认知障碍(MCI + AD)类别方面的性能指标使用来自受试者的测试数据集进行评估。NC模型与CI模型的曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.95、0.93、0.97和0.92;NC和AD分别为0.88、0.88、0.89和0.86;NC与MCI的比值分别为0.85、0.83、0.9和0.81。结论:利用EOR和ECR qEEG状态的差异可以作为一种检测DL痴呆研究中认知功能障碍的实用方法。训练后的模型可以作为临床医生的支持参考,而不是作为诊断工具,而是作为早期诊断认知障碍的决策支持系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difference between eyes-open and eyes-closed resting state quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) for predicting cognitive impairment using deep learning.

Objective: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a method that offers detailed observations of electrical activities occurring in the brain's cerebral cortex. The EEG-derived brain signals can serve as a neurophysiological indicator for the early detection of dementia through quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis. This study introduces a deep learning (DL)-based classification approach trained using the difference between qEEG time-frequency (TF) images of eyes-open resting (EOR) and eyes-closed resting (ECR) state EEG to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Patients and methods: The dataset comprised 16,910 TF images from 890 subjects, including 269 normal controls (NC), 356 with MCI, and 265 diagnosed with AD. Artifact-free EEG signals were converted into qEEG TF images using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), which captured various event-related alterations within the five (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) EEG frequency sub-bands. EEG data was preprocessed using the EEGlab toolbox version 2022 within the MATLAB R2024a software environment. The preprocessed TF images, along with numerical age data, were used as input features in convolutional neural network (CNN) within a DL framework for classification.

Results: The performance metrics of the trained models for EOR - ECR in differentiating NC versus MCI, NC versus AD, and NC versus cognitive impairment (CI) (MCI + AD) classes were assessed using the test dataset from the subjects. The model NC versus CI yielded the best area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity with 0.95, 0.93, 0.97, and 0.92; NC versus AD was 0.88, 0.88, 0.89, and 0.86; and NC versus MCI was 0.85, 0.83, 0.9, and 0.81, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that using the difference between EOR and ECR qEEG states could be a practical approach to detect cognitive impairment in dementia research with DL. The trained models may serve as a supportive reference for clinicians in the future, not as a diagnostic tool, but as a decision-support system for early diagnosis of cognitive impairment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信