视觉凝视与非驾驶相关任务的参与:自动驾驶系统的驾驶模拟器研究。

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Apoorva Pramod Hungund, Radhika Jayant Deshmukh, Niraj Hosadurga, Anuj Kumar Pradhan
{"title":"视觉凝视与非驾驶相关任务的参与:自动驾驶系统的驾驶模拟器研究。","authors":"Apoorva Pramod Hungund, Radhika Jayant Deshmukh, Niraj Hosadurga, Anuj Kumar Pradhan","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2508383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Automated Driving Systems (ADS), classified as Level 3 automated systems (SAE 2021), can potentially reduce risks by conditionally taking control of the driving task. However, drivers must remain alert and be ready to take back control if necessary. This may introduce risks, especially if drivers are distracted. Observing driver behaviors as they engage in different types of NDRTs could help understand how behaviors differ while driving with Level 3 automation. To that end, in this study, we observed drivers when driving with Level 3 automation. Specifically, we analyzed eye movements, non-driving-related task (NDRT) engagement, and responses to takeover requests (TOR) to understand behaviors during automation and transitions to manual driving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a simulator study with 24 fully licensed drivers. Participants drove in a simulator equipped with Level 3 automation and performed two NDRTs: a Surrogate Reference Task and a cellphone task. Drivers were notified visually and verbally about automation status and TORs. Participants' gaze behavior and takeover times were measured during the drive, and post-drive surveys assessed trust and usability scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NDRT type had a significant impact on takeover time, with drivers taking longer to take over during cellphone tasks. Drivers tended to focus more on non-driving related areas right until a TOR. After TORs, drivers tended to shift focus to the Instrument Cluster, underlining the criticality of displaying information about the TOR. Trust and usability scores were comparable across groups, suggesting that drivers generally found the system easy to use and exhibited a reasonable level of trust in it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings reveal that regardless of the NDRT, drivers continued engaging in NDRTs right up till the TOR. Designing intuitive, context-specific interfaces that guide drivers' attention to driving-related areas and provide information can improve drivers' awareness of the TOR and, consequently, their takeover performance. The findings provide significant insights on the potential methods to keep drivers aware of their surroundings while using automation, and while transitioning to manual control. These insights provide information on driving behaviors with Level 3 automation, specifically how fully licensed drivers engage with distraction while driving with Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual gaze and engagement with non-driving related tasks: a driving simulator study with automated driving systems.\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva Pramod Hungund, Radhika Jayant Deshmukh, Niraj Hosadurga, Anuj Kumar Pradhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2508383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Automated Driving Systems (ADS), classified as Level 3 automated systems (SAE 2021), can potentially reduce risks by conditionally taking control of the driving task. However, drivers must remain alert and be ready to take back control if necessary. This may introduce risks, especially if drivers are distracted. Observing driver behaviors as they engage in different types of NDRTs could help understand how behaviors differ while driving with Level 3 automation. To that end, in this study, we observed drivers when driving with Level 3 automation. Specifically, we analyzed eye movements, non-driving-related task (NDRT) engagement, and responses to takeover requests (TOR) to understand behaviors during automation and transitions to manual driving.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a simulator study with 24 fully licensed drivers. Participants drove in a simulator equipped with Level 3 automation and performed two NDRTs: a Surrogate Reference Task and a cellphone task. Drivers were notified visually and verbally about automation status and TORs. Participants' gaze behavior and takeover times were measured during the drive, and post-drive surveys assessed trust and usability scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NDRT type had a significant impact on takeover time, with drivers taking longer to take over during cellphone tasks. Drivers tended to focus more on non-driving related areas right until a TOR. After TORs, drivers tended to shift focus to the Instrument Cluster, underlining the criticality of displaying information about the TOR. Trust and usability scores were comparable across groups, suggesting that drivers generally found the system easy to use and exhibited a reasonable level of trust in it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings reveal that regardless of the NDRT, drivers continued engaging in NDRTs right up till the TOR. Designing intuitive, context-specific interfaces that guide drivers' attention to driving-related areas and provide information can improve drivers' awareness of the TOR and, consequently, their takeover performance. The findings provide significant insights on the potential methods to keep drivers aware of their surroundings while using automation, and while transitioning to manual control. These insights provide information on driving behaviors with Level 3 automation, specifically how fully licensed drivers engage with distraction while driving with Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2508383\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2508383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:自动驾驶系统(ADS)被归类为3级自动驾驶系统(SAE 2021),可以通过有条件地控制驾驶任务来降低风险。然而,司机必须保持警惕,并准备在必要时收回控制权。这可能会带来风险,特别是如果司机分心的话。观察驾驶员在不同类型ndrt下的行为,可以帮助理解驾驶3级自动驾驶时的行为差异。为此,在本研究中,我们观察了驾驶员在驾驶3级自动驾驶时的情况。具体来说,我们分析了眼球运动、非驾驶相关任务(NDRT)参与以及对接管请求(TOR)的响应,以了解自动驾驶和向手动驾驶过渡期间的行为。方法:我们对24名持有正式驾照的司机进行了模拟研究。参与者在配备3级自动化的模拟器中驾驶,并执行两个NDRTs:代理参考任务和手机任务。司机被视觉和口头告知自动化状态和tor。在驾驶过程中测量了参与者的凝视行为和接管时间,驾驶后的调查评估了信任和可用性得分。结果:NDRT类型对接管时间有显著影响,司机在手机任务中接管时间更长。司机倾向于更多地关注与驾驶无关的领域,直到TOR。在TOR之后,司机倾向于将注意力转移到仪表盘上,强调了显示TOR信息的重要性。信任和可用性得分在各组之间是相似的,这表明司机普遍认为该系统易于使用,并对其表现出一定程度的信任。结论:研究结果显示,无论NDRT如何,司机一直参与NDRT直到TOR。设计直观的、特定于上下文的界面,引导驾驶员注意与驾驶相关的区域,并提供信息,可以提高驾驶员对TOR的认识,从而提高他们的接管性能。这些发现为驾驶员在使用自动驾驶和过渡到手动控制时保持对周围环境的感知提供了重要的见解。这些见解提供了有关Level 3自动驾驶的驾驶行为的信息,特别是有完全驾驶执照的驾驶员在驾驶Level 3自动驾驶时分心的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visual gaze and engagement with non-driving related tasks: a driving simulator study with automated driving systems.

Objective: Automated Driving Systems (ADS), classified as Level 3 automated systems (SAE 2021), can potentially reduce risks by conditionally taking control of the driving task. However, drivers must remain alert and be ready to take back control if necessary. This may introduce risks, especially if drivers are distracted. Observing driver behaviors as they engage in different types of NDRTs could help understand how behaviors differ while driving with Level 3 automation. To that end, in this study, we observed drivers when driving with Level 3 automation. Specifically, we analyzed eye movements, non-driving-related task (NDRT) engagement, and responses to takeover requests (TOR) to understand behaviors during automation and transitions to manual driving.

Methods: We conducted a simulator study with 24 fully licensed drivers. Participants drove in a simulator equipped with Level 3 automation and performed two NDRTs: a Surrogate Reference Task and a cellphone task. Drivers were notified visually and verbally about automation status and TORs. Participants' gaze behavior and takeover times were measured during the drive, and post-drive surveys assessed trust and usability scores.

Results: NDRT type had a significant impact on takeover time, with drivers taking longer to take over during cellphone tasks. Drivers tended to focus more on non-driving related areas right until a TOR. After TORs, drivers tended to shift focus to the Instrument Cluster, underlining the criticality of displaying information about the TOR. Trust and usability scores were comparable across groups, suggesting that drivers generally found the system easy to use and exhibited a reasonable level of trust in it.

Conclusions: Findings reveal that regardless of the NDRT, drivers continued engaging in NDRTs right up till the TOR. Designing intuitive, context-specific interfaces that guide drivers' attention to driving-related areas and provide information can improve drivers' awareness of the TOR and, consequently, their takeover performance. The findings provide significant insights on the potential methods to keep drivers aware of their surroundings while using automation, and while transitioning to manual control. These insights provide information on driving behaviors with Level 3 automation, specifically how fully licensed drivers engage with distraction while driving with Level 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信