Jessica E Rast, Jennifer Bromberg, Arina Chesnokova, Molly Sadowsky, Jonas Ventimiglia, Lindsay L Shea
{"title":"智力和发育障碍患者的产后再入院。","authors":"Jessica E Rast, Jennifer Bromberg, Arina Chesnokova, Molly Sadowsky, Jonas Ventimiglia, Lindsay L Shea","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postpartum readmission (PPR) and severe maternal morbidity have been increasing in recent years in the U.S., but little is known about the risk of either for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), including the autism spectrum. The purpose of the study is to establish an estimate of PPR in a nationally representative sample of people with IDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>this study used the National Readmission Database to examine the deliveries of people with IDD (n=5721), people on the autism spectrum (n=1099) and deliveries in people without IDD or autism (n=3,890,553) in 2019 and 2020. Log-binomial regression was used to examine person and delivery characteristics associated with PPR in all deliveries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPR was more common in people with IDD (6.6%) and people on the autism spectrum (3.3%) than in all other deliveries (1.5%). In adjusted analyses, people with IDD (aRR 3.50, 95% CI 3.15, 3.90) and people on the autism spectrum (aRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.42, 2.97) had increased risk of PPR compared to people without these conditions. Other characteristics were also associated with increased risk of PPR, including 2.80 times the risk of PPR in people with severe maternal morbidity compared to those without (95% CI 2.66, 2.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High rates of PPR in people with IDD point to the need for a better understanding of the drivers of such high rates in these populations. These drivers could include population differences in co-occurring health and mental health conditions, social and community support, and accessible health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postpartum Readmission in People with Intellectual and Developmental Disability.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica E Rast, Jennifer Bromberg, Arina Chesnokova, Molly Sadowsky, Jonas Ventimiglia, Lindsay L Shea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postpartum readmission (PPR) and severe maternal morbidity have been increasing in recent years in the U.S., but little is known about the risk of either for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), including the autism spectrum. The purpose of the study is to establish an estimate of PPR in a nationally representative sample of people with IDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>this study used the National Readmission Database to examine the deliveries of people with IDD (n=5721), people on the autism spectrum (n=1099) and deliveries in people without IDD or autism (n=3,890,553) in 2019 and 2020. Log-binomial regression was used to examine person and delivery characteristics associated with PPR in all deliveries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PPR was more common in people with IDD (6.6%) and people on the autism spectrum (3.3%) than in all other deliveries (1.5%). In adjusted analyses, people with IDD (aRR 3.50, 95% CI 3.15, 3.90) and people on the autism spectrum (aRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.42, 2.97) had increased risk of PPR compared to people without these conditions. Other characteristics were also associated with increased risk of PPR, including 2.80 times the risk of PPR in people with severe maternal morbidity compared to those without (95% CI 2.66, 2.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High rates of PPR in people with IDD point to the need for a better understanding of the drivers of such high rates in these populations. These drivers could include population differences in co-occurring health and mental health conditions, social and community support, and accessible health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来,美国的产后再入院(PPR)和严重的产妇发病率一直在增加,但对智力和发育障碍(IDD)患者(包括自闭症谱系)的风险知之甚少。这项研究的目的是在一个具有全国代表性的IDD患者样本中建立小反刍动物病的估计。方法:本研究使用国家再入院数据库,检查2019年和2020年IDD患者(n=5721)、自闭症谱系患者(n=1099)和非IDD或自闭症患者(n= 3890,553)的分娩情况。对数二项回归用于检查所有分娩中与PPR相关的人和分娩特征。结果:PPR在IDD患者(6.6%)和自闭症谱系患者(3.3%)中比所有其他分娩(1.5%)更常见。在调整分析中,IDD患者(aRR 3.50, 95% CI 3.15, 3.90)和自闭症谱系患者(aRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.42, 2.97)与没有这些疾病的人相比,PPR风险增加。其他特征也与PPR风险增加相关,包括重度孕产妇发病率的人群发生PPR的风险是无该病人群的2.80倍(95% CI 2.66, 2.94)。结论:IDD患者小反刍反应发生率高表明需要更好地了解这些人群中如此高发生率的驱动因素。这些驱动因素可能包括共同出现的健康和精神健康状况、社会和社区支持以及可获得的卫生保健方面的人口差异。
Postpartum Readmission in People with Intellectual and Developmental Disability.
Introduction: Postpartum readmission (PPR) and severe maternal morbidity have been increasing in recent years in the U.S., but little is known about the risk of either for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), including the autism spectrum. The purpose of the study is to establish an estimate of PPR in a nationally representative sample of people with IDD.
Methods: this study used the National Readmission Database to examine the deliveries of people with IDD (n=5721), people on the autism spectrum (n=1099) and deliveries in people without IDD or autism (n=3,890,553) in 2019 and 2020. Log-binomial regression was used to examine person and delivery characteristics associated with PPR in all deliveries.
Results: PPR was more common in people with IDD (6.6%) and people on the autism spectrum (3.3%) than in all other deliveries (1.5%). In adjusted analyses, people with IDD (aRR 3.50, 95% CI 3.15, 3.90) and people on the autism spectrum (aRR 2.06, 95% CI 1.42, 2.97) had increased risk of PPR compared to people without these conditions. Other characteristics were also associated with increased risk of PPR, including 2.80 times the risk of PPR in people with severe maternal morbidity compared to those without (95% CI 2.66, 2.94).
Conclusions: High rates of PPR in people with IDD point to the need for a better understanding of the drivers of such high rates in these populations. These drivers could include population differences in co-occurring health and mental health conditions, social and community support, and accessible health care.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.