国家政策环境下跨性别和顺性别成人预防保健服务的差异

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irina Degtiar, Junqyeon Kim, Eli Michaels, Ian Huff, Mike Rudacille, Nancy Clusen, Aaron Ferguson, Esther Smith-Howell, Gilbert Gonzales
{"title":"国家政策环境下跨性别和顺性别成人预防保健服务的差异","authors":"Irina Degtiar, Junqyeon Kim, Eli Michaels, Ian Huff, Mike Rudacille, Nancy Clusen, Aaron Ferguson, Esther Smith-Howell, Gilbert Gonzales","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transgender and gender diverse populations account for more than 1.3 million adults in the United States and experience substantial health disparities and barriers to care. This study compared preventive health services utilization between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments in 10 US states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on adults aged 18 years and older were extracted from two different sources: self-identified transgender (n=748) and cisgender (n=204,973) adults from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, as well as adults receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., transgender; n=38,037) or not receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., cisgender; n=34,645,129) in Medicaid based on provider reimbursement claims between 2017-2019. This study used hierarchical Bayesian models that borrowed information across states, time, and covariate groups to improve precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five gender non-affirming states (Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Idaho, and Indiana) and five gender-affirming states (Illinois, California, Washington, Maryland, and New York). Results based on the BRFSS indicated that the disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in receiving an annual wellness visit, having a primary care provider, and receiving a flu vaccine or screenings for HIV, diabetes, and cervical cancer were wider in gender non-affirming states than in gender-affirming states. Results based on Medicaid claims data were mixed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State-level policy environments may affect disparities in preventive medicine for transgender individuals. Moving towards public policies and best clinical practices that are gender-affirming may improve health care access and advance health equity for transgender and gender diverse populations across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107954"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Preventive Health Services Between Transgender and Cisgender Adults by State-Level Policy Environments.\",\"authors\":\"Irina Degtiar, Junqyeon Kim, Eli Michaels, Ian Huff, Mike Rudacille, Nancy Clusen, Aaron Ferguson, Esther Smith-Howell, Gilbert Gonzales\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transgender and gender diverse populations account for more than 1.3 million adults in the United States and experience substantial health disparities and barriers to care. This study compared preventive health services utilization between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments in 10 US states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on adults aged 18 years and older were extracted from two different sources: self-identified transgender (n=748) and cisgender (n=204,973) adults from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, as well as adults receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., transgender; n=38,037) or not receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., cisgender; n=34,645,129) in Medicaid based on provider reimbursement claims between 2017-2019. This study used hierarchical Bayesian models that borrowed information across states, time, and covariate groups to improve precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five gender non-affirming states (Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Idaho, and Indiana) and five gender-affirming states (Illinois, California, Washington, Maryland, and New York). Results based on the BRFSS indicated that the disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in receiving an annual wellness visit, having a primary care provider, and receiving a flu vaccine or screenings for HIV, diabetes, and cervical cancer were wider in gender non-affirming states than in gender-affirming states. Results based on Medicaid claims data were mixed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State-level policy environments may affect disparities in preventive medicine for transgender individuals. Moving towards public policies and best clinical practices that are gender-affirming may improve health care access and advance health equity for transgender and gender diverse populations across the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在美国,跨性别者和性别多样化人群占130多万成年人,他们在健康方面存在巨大差异,在获得护理方面存在很大障碍。本研究比较了美国10个州跨性别和顺性成年人在州一级政策环境下对预防性卫生服务的利用情况。方法:18岁及以上成年人的数据来自两个不同的来源:2017-2019年行为风险因素监测系统中自我认定的跨性别者(n=748)和顺性别者(n=204,973),以及接受性别认同障碍诊断的成年人(即跨性别者;N =38,037)或未接受性别认同障碍诊断(即顺性别;n=34,645,129),基于提供者在2017-2019年之间的报销要求。本研究使用分层贝叶斯模型,该模型借鉴了跨状态、时间和协变量组的信息,以提高精度。结果:我们确定了五个性别不肯定州(田纳西州、路易斯安那州、德克萨斯州、爱达荷州和印第安纳州)和五个性别肯定州(伊利诺伊州、加利福尼亚州、华盛顿州、马里兰州和纽约州)。基于BRFSS的结果表明,变性人和顺性人之间在接受年度健康检查、获得初级保健提供者、接受流感疫苗或艾滋病毒、糖尿病和宫颈癌筛查方面的差异在性别不确认州比性别确认州更大。基于医疗补助申请数据的结果喜忧参半。结论:国家层面的政策环境可能影响跨性别者预防医学的差异。朝着性别肯定的公共政策和最佳临床实践迈进,可能会改善美国各地跨性别者和性别多样化人群获得医疗保健的机会,并促进健康平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Preventive Health Services Between Transgender and Cisgender Adults by State-Level Policy Environments.

Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse populations account for more than 1.3 million adults in the United States and experience substantial health disparities and barriers to care. This study compared preventive health services utilization between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments in 10 US states.

Methods: Data on adults aged 18 years and older were extracted from two different sources: self-identified transgender (n=748) and cisgender (n=204,973) adults from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, as well as adults receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., transgender; n=38,037) or not receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., cisgender; n=34,645,129) in Medicaid based on provider reimbursement claims between 2017-2019. This study used hierarchical Bayesian models that borrowed information across states, time, and covariate groups to improve precision.

Results: We identified five gender non-affirming states (Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Idaho, and Indiana) and five gender-affirming states (Illinois, California, Washington, Maryland, and New York). Results based on the BRFSS indicated that the disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in receiving an annual wellness visit, having a primary care provider, and receiving a flu vaccine or screenings for HIV, diabetes, and cervical cancer were wider in gender non-affirming states than in gender-affirming states. Results based on Medicaid claims data were mixed.

Conclusions: State-level policy environments may affect disparities in preventive medicine for transgender individuals. Moving towards public policies and best clinical practices that are gender-affirming may improve health care access and advance health equity for transgender and gender diverse populations across the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信