Irina Degtiar, Junqyeon Kim, Eli Michaels, Ian Huff, Mike Rudacille, Nancy Clusen, Aaron Ferguson, Esther Smith-Howell, Gilbert Gonzales
{"title":"国家政策环境下跨性别和顺性别成人预防保健服务的差异","authors":"Irina Degtiar, Junqyeon Kim, Eli Michaels, Ian Huff, Mike Rudacille, Nancy Clusen, Aaron Ferguson, Esther Smith-Howell, Gilbert Gonzales","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transgender and gender diverse populations account for more than 1.3 million adults in the United States and experience substantial health disparities and barriers to care. This study compared preventive health services utilization between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments in 10 US states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on adults aged 18 years and older were extracted from two different sources: self-identified transgender (n=748) and cisgender (n=204,973) adults from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, as well as adults receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., transgender; n=38,037) or not receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., cisgender; n=34,645,129) in Medicaid based on provider reimbursement claims between 2017-2019. This study used hierarchical Bayesian models that borrowed information across states, time, and covariate groups to improve precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five gender non-affirming states (Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Idaho, and Indiana) and five gender-affirming states (Illinois, California, Washington, Maryland, and New York). Results based on the BRFSS indicated that the disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in receiving an annual wellness visit, having a primary care provider, and receiving a flu vaccine or screenings for HIV, diabetes, and cervical cancer were wider in gender non-affirming states than in gender-affirming states. Results based on Medicaid claims data were mixed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State-level policy environments may affect disparities in preventive medicine for transgender individuals. Moving towards public policies and best clinical practices that are gender-affirming may improve health care access and advance health equity for transgender and gender diverse populations across the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107954"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Preventive Health Services Between Transgender and Cisgender Adults by State-Level Policy Environments.\",\"authors\":\"Irina Degtiar, Junqyeon Kim, Eli Michaels, Ian Huff, Mike Rudacille, Nancy Clusen, Aaron Ferguson, Esther Smith-Howell, Gilbert Gonzales\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transgender and gender diverse populations account for more than 1.3 million adults in the United States and experience substantial health disparities and barriers to care. This study compared preventive health services utilization between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments in 10 US states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on adults aged 18 years and older were extracted from two different sources: self-identified transgender (n=748) and cisgender (n=204,973) adults from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, as well as adults receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., transgender; n=38,037) or not receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., cisgender; n=34,645,129) in Medicaid based on provider reimbursement claims between 2017-2019. This study used hierarchical Bayesian models that borrowed information across states, time, and covariate groups to improve precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five gender non-affirming states (Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Idaho, and Indiana) and five gender-affirming states (Illinois, California, Washington, Maryland, and New York). Results based on the BRFSS indicated that the disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in receiving an annual wellness visit, having a primary care provider, and receiving a flu vaccine or screenings for HIV, diabetes, and cervical cancer were wider in gender non-affirming states than in gender-affirming states. Results based on Medicaid claims data were mixed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State-level policy environments may affect disparities in preventive medicine for transgender individuals. Moving towards public policies and best clinical practices that are gender-affirming may improve health care access and advance health equity for transgender and gender diverse populations across the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107954\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities in Preventive Health Services Between Transgender and Cisgender Adults by State-Level Policy Environments.
Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse populations account for more than 1.3 million adults in the United States and experience substantial health disparities and barriers to care. This study compared preventive health services utilization between transgender and cisgender adults by state-level policy environments in 10 US states.
Methods: Data on adults aged 18 years and older were extracted from two different sources: self-identified transgender (n=748) and cisgender (n=204,973) adults from the 2017-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, as well as adults receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., transgender; n=38,037) or not receiving a gender identity disorder diagnosis (i.e., cisgender; n=34,645,129) in Medicaid based on provider reimbursement claims between 2017-2019. This study used hierarchical Bayesian models that borrowed information across states, time, and covariate groups to improve precision.
Results: We identified five gender non-affirming states (Tennessee, Louisiana, Texas, Idaho, and Indiana) and five gender-affirming states (Illinois, California, Washington, Maryland, and New York). Results based on the BRFSS indicated that the disparities between transgender and cisgender adults in receiving an annual wellness visit, having a primary care provider, and receiving a flu vaccine or screenings for HIV, diabetes, and cervical cancer were wider in gender non-affirming states than in gender-affirming states. Results based on Medicaid claims data were mixed.
Conclusions: State-level policy environments may affect disparities in preventive medicine for transgender individuals. Moving towards public policies and best clinical practices that are gender-affirming may improve health care access and advance health equity for transgender and gender diverse populations across the United States.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.