经桡动脉导管置管后桡动脉导管的使用。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yantong Wang, Michael Bailey, Silvana F Marasco
{"title":"经桡动脉导管置管后桡动脉导管的使用。","authors":"Yantong Wang, Michael Bailey, Silvana F Marasco","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial catheterisation (TRC) via the radial artery (RA) is now the default approach for coronary angiography, but TRC is known to be associated with endothelial damage and vasodilatory dysfunction of the RA. To date, there is insufficient evidence regarding the impact of TRC on RA graft patency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with previously catheterised RA grafts was conducted at two major hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Graft patency was assessed with either invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 68 patients were studied, all of whom had bilateral RAs harvested, of which all right RAs had been previously catheterised for angiography. Grafts included sequential and Y grafts leading to 90 left RA (LRA) grafts and 76 right RA (RRA) grafts studied. Previously catheterised RRA grafts had significantly lower patency (72%) than non-catheterised LRA grafts (87%; p=0.02). Female sex, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of myocardial infarction were associated with RRA graft occlusion. Severe right coronary artery stenosis was associated with RRA graft patency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Previously catheterised RRA grafts may have a lower patency rate than non-catheterised LRA grafts. However, previously catheterised RAs remain a useful conduit option especially when other conduit choices are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radial Artery Conduit Use After Transradial Catheterisation.\",\"authors\":\"Yantong Wang, Michael Bailey, Silvana F Marasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial catheterisation (TRC) via the radial artery (RA) is now the default approach for coronary angiography, but TRC is known to be associated with endothelial damage and vasodilatory dysfunction of the RA. To date, there is insufficient evidence regarding the impact of TRC on RA graft patency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with previously catheterised RA grafts was conducted at two major hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Graft patency was assessed with either invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 68 patients were studied, all of whom had bilateral RAs harvested, of which all right RAs had been previously catheterised for angiography. Grafts included sequential and Y grafts leading to 90 left RA (LRA) grafts and 76 right RA (RRA) grafts studied. Previously catheterised RRA grafts had significantly lower patency (72%) than non-catheterised LRA grafts (87%; p=0.02). Female sex, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of myocardial infarction were associated with RRA graft occlusion. Severe right coronary artery stenosis was associated with RRA graft patency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Previously catheterised RRA grafts may have a lower patency rate than non-catheterised LRA grafts. However, previously catheterised RAs remain a useful conduit option especially when other conduit choices are limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2025.03.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经桡动脉(RA)的经桡动脉导管(TRC)是目前冠状动脉造影的默认入路,但已知TRC与RA的内皮损伤和血管舒张功能障碍有关。迄今为止,关于TRC对RA移植物通畅的影响的证据不足。方法:这项回顾性队列研究是在澳大利亚维多利亚州的两家主要医院对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者进行的。通过侵入性或计算机断层冠状动脉造影评估移植物的通畅程度。结果:总体而言,68例患者被研究,所有患者均有双侧RAs切除,其中所有右侧RAs先前已插管进行血管造影。移植包括顺序移植和Y型移植,共获得90例左RA (LRA)移植和76例右RA (RRA)移植。先前置管的RRA移植物的通畅度(72%)明显低于未置管的LRA移植物(87%;p = 0.02)。女性、外周血管疾病和心肌梗死史与RRA移植物闭塞相关。严重的右冠状动脉狭窄与RRA移植物通畅相关。结论:先前置管的RRA移植物的通畅率可能低于未置管的LRA移植物。然而,先前插管的RAs仍然是一种有用的导管选择,特别是当其他导管选择有限时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radial Artery Conduit Use After Transradial Catheterisation.

Background: Transradial catheterisation (TRC) via the radial artery (RA) is now the default approach for coronary angiography, but TRC is known to be associated with endothelial damage and vasodilatory dysfunction of the RA. To date, there is insufficient evidence regarding the impact of TRC on RA graft patency.

Method: This retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with previously catheterised RA grafts was conducted at two major hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Graft patency was assessed with either invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography.

Results: Overall, 68 patients were studied, all of whom had bilateral RAs harvested, of which all right RAs had been previously catheterised for angiography. Grafts included sequential and Y grafts leading to 90 left RA (LRA) grafts and 76 right RA (RRA) grafts studied. Previously catheterised RRA grafts had significantly lower patency (72%) than non-catheterised LRA grafts (87%; p=0.02). Female sex, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of myocardial infarction were associated with RRA graft occlusion. Severe right coronary artery stenosis was associated with RRA graft patency.

Conclusions: Previously catheterised RRA grafts may have a lower patency rate than non-catheterised LRA grafts. However, previously catheterised RAs remain a useful conduit option especially when other conduit choices are limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信