Jan Kafol, Beatriz Miranda, Rok Sikonja, Jaka Sikonja, Albert Wiegman, Ana Margarida Medeiros, Ana Catarina Alves, Tomas Freiberger, Barbara A Hutten, Matej Mlinaric, Tadej Battelino, Steve E Humphries, Mafalda Bourbon, Urh Groselj
{"title":"家族性高胆固醇血症儿科诊断评分(FH-PeDS)的建议。","authors":"Jan Kafol, Beatriz Miranda, Rok Sikonja, Jaka Sikonja, Albert Wiegman, Ana Margarida Medeiros, Ana Catarina Alves, Tomas Freiberger, Barbara A Hutten, Matej Mlinaric, Tadej Battelino, Steve E Humphries, Mafalda Bourbon, Urh Groselj","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) significantly increases cardiovascular risk from childhood yet remains widely underdiagnosed. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate existing pediatric FH diagnostic criteria in real-world cohorts and to develop two novel diagnostic tools: a semi-quantitative scoring system (FH-PeDS) and a machine learning model (ML-FH-PeDS) to enhance early FH detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five established FH diagnostic criteria were assesed (Dutch Lipid Clinics Network [DLCN], Simon Broome, EAS, Simplified Canadian, and Japanese Atherosclerosis Society) in Slovenian (N=1,360) and Portuguese (N=340) pediatric hypercholesterolemia cohorts, using FH-causing variants as the reference standard. FH-PeDS was developed from the Slovenian cohort, and ML-FH-PeDS was trained and tested using a 60%/40% split before external validation in the Portuguese cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 47.4% of genetically confirmed FH cases were identified by all established criteria, while 10.9% were missed entirely. FH-PeDS outperformed DLCN in the combined cohort (AUC 0.897 vs. 0.857; p<0.01). ML-FH-PeDS showed superior predictive power (AUC 0.932 in training, 0.904 in testing vs. 0.852 for DLCN; p<0.01) and performed best as a confirmatory test in the testing subgroup (39.7% sensitivity, 87.7% PPV at 98% specificity). In the Portuguese cohort, ML-FH-PeDS maintained strong predictive performance (AUC 0.867 vs. 0.815 for DLCN; p<0.01) despite population differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current FH diagnostic criteria perform suboptimally in children. FH-PeDS and ML-FH-PeDS provide tools to improve FH detection, particularly where genetic testing is limited. They also help guide genetic testing decisions for hypercholesterolemic children. By enabling earlier diagnosis and intervention, these tools may reduce long-term cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal of a Familial Hypercholesterolemia Pediatric Diagnostic Score (FH-PeDS).\",\"authors\":\"Jan Kafol, Beatriz Miranda, Rok Sikonja, Jaka Sikonja, Albert Wiegman, Ana Margarida Medeiros, Ana Catarina Alves, Tomas Freiberger, Barbara A Hutten, Matej Mlinaric, Tadej Battelino, Steve E Humphries, Mafalda Bourbon, Urh Groselj\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) significantly increases cardiovascular risk from childhood yet remains widely underdiagnosed. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate existing pediatric FH diagnostic criteria in real-world cohorts and to develop two novel diagnostic tools: a semi-quantitative scoring system (FH-PeDS) and a machine learning model (ML-FH-PeDS) to enhance early FH detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five established FH diagnostic criteria were assesed (Dutch Lipid Clinics Network [DLCN], Simon Broome, EAS, Simplified Canadian, and Japanese Atherosclerosis Society) in Slovenian (N=1,360) and Portuguese (N=340) pediatric hypercholesterolemia cohorts, using FH-causing variants as the reference standard. FH-PeDS was developed from the Slovenian cohort, and ML-FH-PeDS was trained and tested using a 60%/40% split before external validation in the Portuguese cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 47.4% of genetically confirmed FH cases were identified by all established criteria, while 10.9% were missed entirely. FH-PeDS outperformed DLCN in the combined cohort (AUC 0.897 vs. 0.857; p<0.01). ML-FH-PeDS showed superior predictive power (AUC 0.932 in training, 0.904 in testing vs. 0.852 for DLCN; p<0.01) and performed best as a confirmatory test in the testing subgroup (39.7% sensitivity, 87.7% PPV at 98% specificity). In the Portuguese cohort, ML-FH-PeDS maintained strong predictive performance (AUC 0.867 vs. 0.815 for DLCN; p<0.01) despite population differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current FH diagnostic criteria perform suboptimally in children. FH-PeDS and ML-FH-PeDS provide tools to improve FH detection, particularly where genetic testing is limited. They also help guide genetic testing decisions for hypercholesterolemic children. By enabling earlier diagnosis and intervention, these tools may reduce long-term cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)从儿童期起显著增加心血管风险,但仍被广泛低估。本横断面研究旨在评估现实世界队列中现有的儿科FH诊断标准,并开发两种新的诊断工具:半定量评分系统(FH- peds)和机器学习模型(ML-FH-PeDS),以增强FH的早期检测。方法:在斯洛文尼亚(N= 1360)和葡萄牙(N=340)儿童高胆固醇血症队列中,以FH致变异体作为参考标准,评估五种已建立的FH诊断标准(荷兰脂质诊所网络[DLCN]、Simon Broome、EAS、简化加拿大和日本动脉粥样硬化协会)。FH-PeDS是从斯洛文尼亚队列开发的,ML-FH-PeDS在葡萄牙队列进行外部验证之前,使用60%/40%的比例进行培训和测试。结果:基因确诊的FH病例中,仅有47.4%符合所有既定标准,10.9%完全漏诊。FH-PeDS在联合队列中优于DLCN (AUC 0.897 vs 0.857;结论:目前的FH诊断标准在儿童中表现不佳。FH- peds和ML-FH-PeDS提供了改进FH检测的工具,特别是在基因检测有限的情况下。它们还有助于指导高胆固醇儿童的基因检测决策。通过早期诊断和干预,这些工具可以降低长期心血管风险并改善预后。
Proposal of a Familial Hypercholesterolemia Pediatric Diagnostic Score (FH-PeDS).
Background and aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) significantly increases cardiovascular risk from childhood yet remains widely underdiagnosed. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate existing pediatric FH diagnostic criteria in real-world cohorts and to develop two novel diagnostic tools: a semi-quantitative scoring system (FH-PeDS) and a machine learning model (ML-FH-PeDS) to enhance early FH detection.
Methods: Five established FH diagnostic criteria were assesed (Dutch Lipid Clinics Network [DLCN], Simon Broome, EAS, Simplified Canadian, and Japanese Atherosclerosis Society) in Slovenian (N=1,360) and Portuguese (N=340) pediatric hypercholesterolemia cohorts, using FH-causing variants as the reference standard. FH-PeDS was developed from the Slovenian cohort, and ML-FH-PeDS was trained and tested using a 60%/40% split before external validation in the Portuguese cohort.
Results: Only 47.4% of genetically confirmed FH cases were identified by all established criteria, while 10.9% were missed entirely. FH-PeDS outperformed DLCN in the combined cohort (AUC 0.897 vs. 0.857; p<0.01). ML-FH-PeDS showed superior predictive power (AUC 0.932 in training, 0.904 in testing vs. 0.852 for DLCN; p<0.01) and performed best as a confirmatory test in the testing subgroup (39.7% sensitivity, 87.7% PPV at 98% specificity). In the Portuguese cohort, ML-FH-PeDS maintained strong predictive performance (AUC 0.867 vs. 0.815 for DLCN; p<0.01) despite population differences.
Conclusions: Current FH diagnostic criteria perform suboptimally in children. FH-PeDS and ML-FH-PeDS provide tools to improve FH detection, particularly where genetic testing is limited. They also help guide genetic testing decisions for hypercholesterolemic children. By enabling earlier diagnosis and intervention, these tools may reduce long-term cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.