眼眶恶性肿瘤患者生活质量问卷的制定与评价。

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Haihan Yan, Junlian Lang, Shaoxiao Yan, Li Wang, Rui Liu, Nan Wang, Liangyuan Xu, Qihan Guo, Tingting Ren, Runzi Yang, Yufei Zhang, Feng Ke, Jianmin Ma
{"title":"眼眶恶性肿瘤患者生活质量问卷的制定与评价。","authors":"Haihan Yan, Junlian Lang, Shaoxiao Yan, Li Wang, Rui Liu, Nan Wang, Liangyuan Xu, Qihan Guo, Tingting Ren, Runzi Yang, Yufei Zhang, Feng Ke, Jianmin Ma","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital malignant tumours seriously affect the quality of life of patients; however, there is currently no quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pool of items was generated through a literature search, expert meeting and patient interview. Pre-survey and scale evaluation were performed, the quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours (QLQ-OT) was modified, and the scale was evaluated by measuring the quality of life of 46 patients with orbital tumours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective rate of QLQ-OT was 97.4%, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was >0.6, and the test-retest reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was >0.7, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Pearson correlation coefficients were >0.8 between individual domain scores; > 0.6 between items and their own domains in the QLQ-OT; and >0.6 between domains and their corresponding domains in Quality of Life Center Questionnaire, thereby indicating good content, convergent and criterion-related validity. Ten principal components (the initial eigenvalues >1) were abstracted from 38 items of the general by factor analysis, accounting for 81.0% of cumulative variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QLQ-OT has good compliance, reliability, validity and responsiveness and can be used to measure the quality of life of patients with orbital malignant tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and evaluation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.\",\"authors\":\"Haihan Yan, Junlian Lang, Shaoxiao Yan, Li Wang, Rui Liu, Nan Wang, Liangyuan Xu, Qihan Guo, Tingting Ren, Runzi Yang, Yufei Zhang, Feng Ke, Jianmin Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital malignant tumours seriously affect the quality of life of patients; however, there is currently no quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and evaluate a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pool of items was generated through a literature search, expert meeting and patient interview. Pre-survey and scale evaluation were performed, the quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours (QLQ-OT) was modified, and the scale was evaluated by measuring the quality of life of 46 patients with orbital tumours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The effective rate of QLQ-OT was 97.4%, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was >0.6, and the test-retest reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was >0.7, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Pearson correlation coefficients were >0.8 between individual domain scores; > 0.6 between items and their own domains in the QLQ-OT; and >0.6 between domains and their corresponding domains in Quality of Life Center Questionnaire, thereby indicating good content, convergent and criterion-related validity. Ten principal components (the initial eigenvalues >1) were abstracted from 38 items of the general by factor analysis, accounting for 81.0% of cumulative variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QLQ-OT has good compliance, reliability, validity and responsiveness and can be used to measure the quality of life of patients with orbital malignant tumours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼眶恶性肿瘤严重影响患者的生活质量;然而,目前尚无针对眼眶恶性肿瘤患者的生活质量调查问卷。目的:编制并评价眼眶恶性肿瘤患者的生活质量问卷。方法:通过文献检索、专家会议和患者访谈等方式生成项目库。进行预调查和量表评定,修改眼窝恶性肿瘤患者生活质量问卷(QLQ-OT),通过测量46例眼窝恶性肿瘤患者的生活质量对量表进行评定。结果:QLQ-OT的有效率为97.4%,Cronbach’s alpha系数为>0.6,重测信度类内相关系数为>0.7,具有良好的内部一致性和重测信度。各领域得分之间的Pearson相关系数为bb0 0.8;在QLQ-OT中,项目和它们自己的域之间的> 0.6;在生活质量中心问卷中,域与相应域之间的差异为>0.6,表明内容、收敛性和标度相关的效度较好。通过因子分析,从38个一般性条目中提取了10个主成分(初始特征值>1),占累积方差的81.0%。结论:QLQ-OT具有良好的依从性、信度、效度和反应性,可用于衡量眼眶恶性肿瘤患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and evaluation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.

Background: Orbital malignant tumours seriously affect the quality of life of patients; however, there is currently no quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.

Objective: To develop and evaluate a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.

Methods: A pool of items was generated through a literature search, expert meeting and patient interview. Pre-survey and scale evaluation were performed, the quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours (QLQ-OT) was modified, and the scale was evaluated by measuring the quality of life of 46 patients with orbital tumours.

Results: The effective rate of QLQ-OT was 97.4%, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was >0.6, and the test-retest reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was >0.7, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Pearson correlation coefficients were >0.8 between individual domain scores; > 0.6 between items and their own domains in the QLQ-OT; and >0.6 between domains and their corresponding domains in Quality of Life Center Questionnaire, thereby indicating good content, convergent and criterion-related validity. Ten principal components (the initial eigenvalues >1) were abstracted from 38 items of the general by factor analysis, accounting for 81.0% of cumulative variance.

Conclusions: QLQ-OT has good compliance, reliability, validity and responsiveness and can be used to measure the quality of life of patients with orbital malignant tumours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信