{"title":"口服避孕药和精神药物联合使用-避孕失败和不良事件的风险。","authors":"Tanja Boehnke, Christian Franke, Anja Bauerfeind, Klaas Heinemann, Katja Koelkebeck, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and psychotropic drugs (PDs) are commonly used drugs in the female population. Yet, the quantity and quality of previous studies on drug interactions between these two medications is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide a detailed overview of the concomitant use of COCs and PDs and its potential risk of contraceptive failure and adverse events (AEs) in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A pooled analysis of four large, prospective, multinational cohort studies comprising new users of COCs with and without concomitant PD intake. We used exact matching (variable 1:10 ratio) on region, smoking status, age, and Body Mass Index (BMI) groups. Contraceptive failure and selected AEs occurring within six months after COC initiation were expressed by incidence rates per 100 women-years, crude, and adjusted Cox regression hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) separately for Europe and the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 8081 COC+PD users (Europe: 2271, United States: 5810) and 70,009 COC-only users (Europe: 22,685, United States: 47,324) were considered for analysis. No significant difference was found for the risk of contraceptive failure between COC+PD and COC-only users. The hazard ratios adjusted for age, BMI, medical history, oral contraceptive user status (i.e., first-time ever user, switcher, restarter after intake break), and education level were 1.4 (95% CI, 0.56 - 3.52) for Europe and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.55 - 1.09) for the United States. The risk of adverse events was 1.5-fold higher in COC+PD users than in COC-only users (Europe: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.13 - 2.02]; United States: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.22 - 1.88]). Most AEs were related to the digestive and genitourinary systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference in the risk of contraceptive failure was found for COC+PD and COC-only users, while COC+PD users tend to experience more AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-administration of combined oral contraceptives and psychotropic drugs - risk of contraceptive failure and adverse events.\",\"authors\":\"Tanja Boehnke, Christian Franke, Anja Bauerfeind, Klaas Heinemann, Katja Koelkebeck, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and psychotropic drugs (PDs) are commonly used drugs in the female population. Yet, the quantity and quality of previous studies on drug interactions between these two medications is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide a detailed overview of the concomitant use of COCs and PDs and its potential risk of contraceptive failure and adverse events (AEs) in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A pooled analysis of four large, prospective, multinational cohort studies comprising new users of COCs with and without concomitant PD intake. We used exact matching (variable 1:10 ratio) on region, smoking status, age, and Body Mass Index (BMI) groups. Contraceptive failure and selected AEs occurring within six months after COC initiation were expressed by incidence rates per 100 women-years, crude, and adjusted Cox regression hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) separately for Europe and the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 8081 COC+PD users (Europe: 2271, United States: 5810) and 70,009 COC-only users (Europe: 22,685, United States: 47,324) were considered for analysis. No significant difference was found for the risk of contraceptive failure between COC+PD and COC-only users. The hazard ratios adjusted for age, BMI, medical history, oral contraceptive user status (i.e., first-time ever user, switcher, restarter after intake break), and education level were 1.4 (95% CI, 0.56 - 3.52) for Europe and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.55 - 1.09) for the United States. The risk of adverse events was 1.5-fold higher in COC+PD users than in COC-only users (Europe: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.13 - 2.02]; United States: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.22 - 1.88]). Most AEs were related to the digestive and genitourinary systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference in the risk of contraceptive failure was found for COC+PD and COC-only users, while COC+PD users tend to experience more AEs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.048\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Co-administration of combined oral contraceptives and psychotropic drugs - risk of contraceptive failure and adverse events.
Background: Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and psychotropic drugs (PDs) are commonly used drugs in the female population. Yet, the quantity and quality of previous studies on drug interactions between these two medications is limited.
Objectives: To provide a detailed overview of the concomitant use of COCs and PDs and its potential risk of contraceptive failure and adverse events (AEs) in routine clinical practice.
Study design: A pooled analysis of four large, prospective, multinational cohort studies comprising new users of COCs with and without concomitant PD intake. We used exact matching (variable 1:10 ratio) on region, smoking status, age, and Body Mass Index (BMI) groups. Contraceptive failure and selected AEs occurring within six months after COC initiation were expressed by incidence rates per 100 women-years, crude, and adjusted Cox regression hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) separately for Europe and the United States.
Results: After matching, 8081 COC+PD users (Europe: 2271, United States: 5810) and 70,009 COC-only users (Europe: 22,685, United States: 47,324) were considered for analysis. No significant difference was found for the risk of contraceptive failure between COC+PD and COC-only users. The hazard ratios adjusted for age, BMI, medical history, oral contraceptive user status (i.e., first-time ever user, switcher, restarter after intake break), and education level were 1.4 (95% CI, 0.56 - 3.52) for Europe and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.55 - 1.09) for the United States. The risk of adverse events was 1.5-fold higher in COC+PD users than in COC-only users (Europe: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.13 - 2.02]; United States: 1.5 [95% CI, 1.22 - 1.88]). Most AEs were related to the digestive and genitourinary systems.
Conclusions: No difference in the risk of contraceptive failure was found for COC+PD and COC-only users, while COC+PD users tend to experience more AEs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.