转录组分析显示,CRISPR/ cas9介导的CD163和pAPN双敲除猪的脾脏没有明显的意外影响。

IF 3.1 4区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Zhi-Guo Liu, Nan Wang, Wan-Jie Wang, Lei Huang, Shun-Shun Chi, Yu-Xin Nie, Mao-Sha Yuan, Ya-Ru Sun, Yu-Lian Mu, Kui Li
{"title":"转录组分析显示,CRISPR/ cas9介导的CD163和pAPN双敲除猪的脾脏没有明显的意外影响。","authors":"Zhi-Guo Liu, Nan Wang, Wan-Jie Wang, Lei Huang, Shun-Shun Chi, Yu-Xin Nie, Mao-Sha Yuan, Ya-Ru Sun, Yu-Lian Mu, Kui Li","doi":"10.1007/s10142-025-01639-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gene editing provides powerful tools for farm animal breeding. Our group previously obtained CD163/pAPN double-knockout (DKO) pigs via CRISPR/Cas9 and somatic cell nuclear transfer. These pigs are not only resistant to three infectious viruses but also maintain normal production performance. However, unintended effects of CRISPR/Cas9 tools may pose potential risks to animal well-being or safety. This study aimed to characterize the differences in splenic gene expression between wild-type (WT) and DKO pigs, providing a basis for safety evaluation of gene-edited animals. A comprehensive transcriptional panorama reflected considerable congruence in the aggregate gene expression profiles of the DKO and WT pigs. Comparisons between 35-day-old and 11-month-old DKO pigs and their WT equivalents revealed 225 and 242 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively, a count significantly lower than that of the DEGs in the disparate developmental stage comparison groups. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the majority of DEGs between DKO and WT pigs correlated with the biological functions of CD163 and pAPN, without any alterations in the expression of tumor suppressor genes in DKO pigs. This revealed a less pronounced effect of dual gene editing on the gene expression profile of porcine spleens than the effect of animal maturation, with no evident unanticipated consequences observed in DKO pigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":574,"journal":{"name":"Functional & Integrative Genomics","volume":"25 1","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcriptome analysis reveals no obvious unintended effects in the spleen of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated CD163 and pAPN double-knockout pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi-Guo Liu, Nan Wang, Wan-Jie Wang, Lei Huang, Shun-Shun Chi, Yu-Xin Nie, Mao-Sha Yuan, Ya-Ru Sun, Yu-Lian Mu, Kui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10142-025-01639-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gene editing provides powerful tools for farm animal breeding. Our group previously obtained CD163/pAPN double-knockout (DKO) pigs via CRISPR/Cas9 and somatic cell nuclear transfer. These pigs are not only resistant to three infectious viruses but also maintain normal production performance. However, unintended effects of CRISPR/Cas9 tools may pose potential risks to animal well-being or safety. This study aimed to characterize the differences in splenic gene expression between wild-type (WT) and DKO pigs, providing a basis for safety evaluation of gene-edited animals. A comprehensive transcriptional panorama reflected considerable congruence in the aggregate gene expression profiles of the DKO and WT pigs. Comparisons between 35-day-old and 11-month-old DKO pigs and their WT equivalents revealed 225 and 242 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively, a count significantly lower than that of the DEGs in the disparate developmental stage comparison groups. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the majority of DEGs between DKO and WT pigs correlated with the biological functions of CD163 and pAPN, without any alterations in the expression of tumor suppressor genes in DKO pigs. This revealed a less pronounced effect of dual gene editing on the gene expression profile of porcine spleens than the effect of animal maturation, with no evident unanticipated consequences observed in DKO pigs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functional & Integrative Genomics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functional & Integrative Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-025-01639-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional & Integrative Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-025-01639-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因编辑为农场动物育种提供了强大的工具。本课课组此前通过CRISPR/Cas9和体细胞核移植获得了CD163/pAPN双敲除(DKO)猪。这些猪不仅能抵抗三种传染性病毒,而且还能保持正常的生产性能。然而,CRISPR/Cas9工具的意外影响可能对动物健康或安全构成潜在风险。本研究旨在表征野生型(WT)和DKO猪脾脏基因表达的差异,为基因编辑动物的安全性评价提供依据。全面的转录全景图反映了DKO和WT猪的总体基因表达谱的相当一致性。35日龄和11月龄DKO猪及其WT同类猪的差异表达基因(DEGs)数量分别为225和242,显著低于不同发育阶段对照组的差异表达基因(DEGs)数量。基因本体(GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径富集分析显示,DKO猪和WT猪之间的大多数deg与CD163和pAPN的生物学功能相关,而DKO猪的肿瘤抑制基因表达没有变化。这表明双基因编辑对猪脾脏基因表达谱的影响不如动物成熟的影响明显,在DKO猪中没有观察到明显的意外后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcriptome analysis reveals no obvious unintended effects in the spleen of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated CD163 and pAPN double-knockout pigs.

Gene editing provides powerful tools for farm animal breeding. Our group previously obtained CD163/pAPN double-knockout (DKO) pigs via CRISPR/Cas9 and somatic cell nuclear transfer. These pigs are not only resistant to three infectious viruses but also maintain normal production performance. However, unintended effects of CRISPR/Cas9 tools may pose potential risks to animal well-being or safety. This study aimed to characterize the differences in splenic gene expression between wild-type (WT) and DKO pigs, providing a basis for safety evaluation of gene-edited animals. A comprehensive transcriptional panorama reflected considerable congruence in the aggregate gene expression profiles of the DKO and WT pigs. Comparisons between 35-day-old and 11-month-old DKO pigs and their WT equivalents revealed 225 and 242 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively, a count significantly lower than that of the DEGs in the disparate developmental stage comparison groups. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses revealed that the majority of DEGs between DKO and WT pigs correlated with the biological functions of CD163 and pAPN, without any alterations in the expression of tumor suppressor genes in DKO pigs. This revealed a less pronounced effect of dual gene editing on the gene expression profile of porcine spleens than the effect of animal maturation, with no evident unanticipated consequences observed in DKO pigs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Functional & Integrative Genomics is devoted to large-scale studies of genomes and their functions, including systems analyses of biological processes. The journal will provide the research community an integrated platform where researchers can share, review and discuss their findings on important biological questions that will ultimately enable us to answer the fundamental question: How do genomes work?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信