现实世界中基线风险和一线治疗的慢性髓性白血病结局:来自意大利网络/CML校园的数据

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-06-29 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35963
Valentina Giai MD, PhD, Tiziana Rosso MSc, PhD, Fausto Castagnetti MD, PhD, Patrizia Pregno MD, Massimiliano Bonifacio MD, PhD, Isabella Capodanno MD, Mario Tiribelli MD, PhD, Fabio Stagno MD, PhD, Giovanni Caocci MD, PhD, Antonella Gozzini MD, Luigiana Luciano MD, Sara Galimberti MD, PhD, Monica Bocchia MD, PhD, Andrea Patriarca MD, Giuseppe Lanzarone MD, Bruno Martino MD, Anna Guella MD, Anna Rita Scortechini MD, Carmen Fava MD, PhD, Claudio Fozza MD, PhD, Simona Sica MD, PhD, Nicola Di Renzo MD, Pellegrino Musto MD, PhD, Domenico Pastore MD, PhD, Alessandro Maggi MD, Michele Pizzuti MD, Lorella Maria Antonia Melillo MD, Angelo Michele Carella MD, PhD, Giuseppe Tarantini MD, Anna Mele MD, Elisabetta Calistri MD, Maria Rosaria Coppi MD, Fabio Saccona MSc, Emilia Scalzulli MD, Beatrice Battaglio MD, Miriam Iezza MD, Cinzia Bitetti MD, Roberto Freilone MD, Gianantonio Rosti MD, Francesco Albano MD, PhD, Fabrizio Pane MD, PhD, Giorgina Specchia MD, PhD, Giovannino Ciccone MD, PhD, Giuseppe Saglio MD, PhD, Massimo Breccia MD
{"title":"现实世界中基线风险和一线治疗的慢性髓性白血病结局:来自意大利网络/CML校园的数据","authors":"Valentina Giai MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tiziana Rosso MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Fausto Castagnetti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Patrizia Pregno MD,&nbsp;Massimiliano Bonifacio MD, PhD,&nbsp;Isabella Capodanno MD,&nbsp;Mario Tiribelli MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fabio Stagno MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giovanni Caocci MD, PhD,&nbsp;Antonella Gozzini MD,&nbsp;Luigiana Luciano MD,&nbsp;Sara Galimberti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Monica Bocchia MD, PhD,&nbsp;Andrea Patriarca MD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Lanzarone MD,&nbsp;Bruno Martino MD,&nbsp;Anna Guella MD,&nbsp;Anna Rita Scortechini MD,&nbsp;Carmen Fava MD, PhD,&nbsp;Claudio Fozza MD, PhD,&nbsp;Simona Sica MD, PhD,&nbsp;Nicola Di Renzo MD,&nbsp;Pellegrino Musto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Domenico Pastore MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alessandro Maggi MD,&nbsp;Michele Pizzuti MD,&nbsp;Lorella Maria Antonia Melillo MD,&nbsp;Angelo Michele Carella MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Tarantini MD,&nbsp;Anna Mele MD,&nbsp;Elisabetta Calistri MD,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Coppi MD,&nbsp;Fabio Saccona MSc,&nbsp;Emilia Scalzulli MD,&nbsp;Beatrice Battaglio MD,&nbsp;Miriam Iezza MD,&nbsp;Cinzia Bitetti MD,&nbsp;Roberto Freilone MD,&nbsp;Gianantonio Rosti MD,&nbsp;Francesco Albano MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fabrizio Pane MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giorgina Specchia MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giovannino Ciccone MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Saglio MD, PhD,&nbsp;Massimo Breccia MD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Improved outcome has been reported in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in sponsored trials.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a multicenter prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML from 19 regions in Italy. Baseline treatments and prognostic factors on time to first optimal molecular response (≥ molecular response 3, MR3), time to disease progression, time to death from CML, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariable Fine and Gray models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The authors included 1433 CML patients: 49% (median age, 70 years) treated with frontline imatinib (IMA), and 51% treated with second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs; median age, 52 years). EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) was low in 68.1% of 2G-TKIs patients, compared to 50.4% of IMA patients. Faster molecular responses were observed with 2G-TKIs within the first 6 months and maintained thereafter (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.50). Female gender and low ELTS risk had faster time of response. Achieving major molecular response (MMR or MR3) was associated with reduced risk of progression at 6 and 12 months. Overall, 41 patients progressed without differences between IMA and 2G-TKIs. Intermediate and high risk ELTS showed higher risk of progression and death from CML. Twenty-two CML-related deaths (16.5%) occurred mostly in the first 2 years from diagnosis, higher in 2G-TKIs patients (sHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.52–5.87). OS at 5 years was 88% with no clear differences between IMA and 2G-TKIs treatment after adjustment for potential confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study confirms faster responses with 2G-TKIs compared to IMA but similar clinical outcomes and a strong prognostic effect of ELTS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35963","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes according to baseline risk and first-line treatment in real-world settings: Data from the Italian Network/CML Campus\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Giai MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tiziana Rosso MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Fausto Castagnetti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Patrizia Pregno MD,&nbsp;Massimiliano Bonifacio MD, PhD,&nbsp;Isabella Capodanno MD,&nbsp;Mario Tiribelli MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fabio Stagno MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giovanni Caocci MD, PhD,&nbsp;Antonella Gozzini MD,&nbsp;Luigiana Luciano MD,&nbsp;Sara Galimberti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Monica Bocchia MD, PhD,&nbsp;Andrea Patriarca MD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Lanzarone MD,&nbsp;Bruno Martino MD,&nbsp;Anna Guella MD,&nbsp;Anna Rita Scortechini MD,&nbsp;Carmen Fava MD, PhD,&nbsp;Claudio Fozza MD, PhD,&nbsp;Simona Sica MD, PhD,&nbsp;Nicola Di Renzo MD,&nbsp;Pellegrino Musto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Domenico Pastore MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alessandro Maggi MD,&nbsp;Michele Pizzuti MD,&nbsp;Lorella Maria Antonia Melillo MD,&nbsp;Angelo Michele Carella MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Tarantini MD,&nbsp;Anna Mele MD,&nbsp;Elisabetta Calistri MD,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Coppi MD,&nbsp;Fabio Saccona MSc,&nbsp;Emilia Scalzulli MD,&nbsp;Beatrice Battaglio MD,&nbsp;Miriam Iezza MD,&nbsp;Cinzia Bitetti MD,&nbsp;Roberto Freilone MD,&nbsp;Gianantonio Rosti MD,&nbsp;Francesco Albano MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fabrizio Pane MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giorgina Specchia MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giovannino Ciccone MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giuseppe Saglio MD, PhD,&nbsp;Massimo Breccia MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Improved outcome has been reported in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in sponsored trials.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a multicenter prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML from 19 regions in Italy. Baseline treatments and prognostic factors on time to first optimal molecular response (≥ molecular response 3, MR3), time to disease progression, time to death from CML, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariable Fine and Gray models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The authors included 1433 CML patients: 49% (median age, 70 years) treated with frontline imatinib (IMA), and 51% treated with second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs; median age, 52 years). EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) was low in 68.1% of 2G-TKIs patients, compared to 50.4% of IMA patients. Faster molecular responses were observed with 2G-TKIs within the first 6 months and maintained thereafter (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.50). Female gender and low ELTS risk had faster time of response. Achieving major molecular response (MMR or MR3) was associated with reduced risk of progression at 6 and 12 months. Overall, 41 patients progressed without differences between IMA and 2G-TKIs. Intermediate and high risk ELTS showed higher risk of progression and death from CML. Twenty-two CML-related deaths (16.5%) occurred mostly in the first 2 years from diagnosis, higher in 2G-TKIs patients (sHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.52–5.87). OS at 5 years was 88% with no clear differences between IMA and 2G-TKIs treatment after adjustment for potential confounders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study confirms faster responses with 2G-TKIs compared to IMA but similar clinical outcomes and a strong prognostic effect of ELTS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"131 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35963\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35963\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在赞助的试验中,使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的预后有所改善。方法:这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是意大利19个地区新诊断的慢性粒细胞白血病患者。使用多变量Fine和Gray模型分析基线治疗和首次最佳分子反应时间(≥分子反应3,MR3),疾病进展时间,CML死亡时间和总生存期(OS)的预后因素。结果作者纳入了1433例CML患者:49%(中位年龄70岁)接受一线伊马替尼(IMA)治疗,51%接受第二代TKIs (2G-TKIs;中位年龄,52岁)。在2G-TKIs患者中,68.1%的患者EUTOS长期生存期(ELTS)较低,而IMA患者的这一比例为50.4%。2G-TKIs在前6个月内观察到更快的分子反应,此后一直保持(亚危险比[sHR], 1.31;95%可信区间[CI], 1.15-1.50)。女性和低雅思风险患者的反应时间更快。获得主要分子缓解(MMR或MR3)与6个月和12个月时进展风险降低相关。总体而言,41例患者进展无IMA和2G-TKIs差异。中度和高风险ELTS表现出更高的CML进展和死亡风险。22例cml相关死亡(16.5%)主要发生在诊断后的头2年,2G-TKIs患者更高(sHR, 1.75;95% ci, 0.52-5.87)。在调整潜在混杂因素后,5年的OS为88%,IMA和2G-TKIs治疗之间没有明显差异。研究证实,与IMA相比,2G-TKIs的反应更快,但临床结果相似,elt的预后效果也很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes according to baseline risk and first-line treatment in real-world settings: Data from the Italian Network/CML Campus

Chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes according to baseline risk and first-line treatment in real-world settings: Data from the Italian Network/CML Campus

Background

Improved outcome has been reported in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in sponsored trials.

Methods

This is a multicenter prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML from 19 regions in Italy. Baseline treatments and prognostic factors on time to first optimal molecular response (≥ molecular response 3, MR3), time to disease progression, time to death from CML, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariable Fine and Gray models.

Results

The authors included 1433 CML patients: 49% (median age, 70 years) treated with frontline imatinib (IMA), and 51% treated with second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs; median age, 52 years). EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) was low in 68.1% of 2G-TKIs patients, compared to 50.4% of IMA patients. Faster molecular responses were observed with 2G-TKIs within the first 6 months and maintained thereafter (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–1.50). Female gender and low ELTS risk had faster time of response. Achieving major molecular response (MMR or MR3) was associated with reduced risk of progression at 6 and 12 months. Overall, 41 patients progressed without differences between IMA and 2G-TKIs. Intermediate and high risk ELTS showed higher risk of progression and death from CML. Twenty-two CML-related deaths (16.5%) occurred mostly in the first 2 years from diagnosis, higher in 2G-TKIs patients (sHR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.52–5.87). OS at 5 years was 88% with no clear differences between IMA and 2G-TKIs treatment after adjustment for potential confounders.

Conclusions

The study confirms faster responses with 2G-TKIs compared to IMA but similar clinical outcomes and a strong prognostic effect of ELTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信