Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash, Mathew Varghese Nellimootil, Binila Chacko, Darpanarayan Hazra, Victor Coelho, John Emmanuel Jesudasan, Karthik Gunasekaran, Lovely Thomas, More Atul Ramchandra, Jonathan Melchizedek, Henah Meshack Gunaraj, Mahesh Moorthy, John Victor Peter
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间一线医护人员感染COVID-19的风险。","authors":"Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash, Mathew Varghese Nellimootil, Binila Chacko, Darpanarayan Hazra, Victor Coelho, John Emmanuel Jesudasan, Karthik Gunasekaran, Lovely Thomas, More Atul Ramchandra, Jonathan Melchizedek, Henah Meshack Gunaraj, Mahesh Moorthy, John Victor Peter","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the initial stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) who were immunologically naive to COVID-19, were exposed to a highly transmissible virus.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare infection risk among HCWs in high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed clinical infection and samples for nucleocapsid, and spike protein antibodies were collected at five time-points (T1 to T5) from HCWs in the emergency department and intensive care unit (HR group) and pre-clinical and para-clinical areas (LR). For the sero-study, only participants who provided at least one baseline sample and one during the second wave (T4 or T5) were analysed. Since Covishield<sup>TM</sup> elicits only spike protein antibodies, subclinical infection was diagnosed if asymptomatic unvaccinated and Covishield<sup>TM</sup> vaccinated individuals tested positive for nucleocapsid antibody.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, by T5, clinical infection rate was similar in the HR (120/366, 32.8%) and LR (22/82, 26.8%) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.17). However, before vaccination (T3), more HCWs in the HR group developed COVID-19 infection (21.9% <i>vs</i> 8.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.046). In the sero-study group, clinical infection occurred in 31.5% (45/143) and 23.7% (14/59) in the HR and LR groups respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.23). Spike antibody was detected in 140/143 (97.9%) and 56/59 (94.9%) and nucleocapsid antibody was positive in 95/143 (66.4%) and 35/59 (59.3%) in the HR and LR groups respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.34). Subclinical infection rate (HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.37) and hospitalization rate were similar. There was no mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before vaccination, HCWs in HR areas had a higher risk of infection. Seroprevalence studies suggest that sub-clinical infection was not uncommon.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 2","pages":"99663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of COVID-19 infection among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Kundavaram Paul Prabhakar Abhilash, Mathew Varghese Nellimootil, Binila Chacko, Darpanarayan Hazra, Victor Coelho, John Emmanuel Jesudasan, Karthik Gunasekaran, Lovely Thomas, More Atul Ramchandra, Jonathan Melchizedek, Henah Meshack Gunaraj, Mahesh Moorthy, John Victor Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the initial stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) who were immunologically naive to COVID-19, were exposed to a highly transmissible virus.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare infection risk among HCWs in high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed clinical infection and samples for nucleocapsid, and spike protein antibodies were collected at five time-points (T1 to T5) from HCWs in the emergency department and intensive care unit (HR group) and pre-clinical and para-clinical areas (LR). For the sero-study, only participants who provided at least one baseline sample and one during the second wave (T4 or T5) were analysed. Since Covishield<sup>TM</sup> elicits only spike protein antibodies, subclinical infection was diagnosed if asymptomatic unvaccinated and Covishield<sup>TM</sup> vaccinated individuals tested positive for nucleocapsid antibody.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, by T5, clinical infection rate was similar in the HR (120/366, 32.8%) and LR (22/82, 26.8%) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.17). However, before vaccination (T3), more HCWs in the HR group developed COVID-19 infection (21.9% <i>vs</i> 8.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.046). In the sero-study group, clinical infection occurred in 31.5% (45/143) and 23.7% (14/59) in the HR and LR groups respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.23). Spike antibody was detected in 140/143 (97.9%) and 56/59 (94.9%) and nucleocapsid antibody was positive in 95/143 (66.4%) and 35/59 (59.3%) in the HR and LR groups respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.34). Subclinical infection rate (HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.37) and hospitalization rate were similar. There was no mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Before vaccination, HCWs in HR areas had a higher risk of infection. Seroprevalence studies suggest that sub-clinical infection was not uncommon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":61903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"99663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v14.i2.99663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的初始阶段,免疫未接触COVID-19的卫生保健工作者(HCWs)暴露于高传染性病毒。目的:比较高危地区(HR)和低危地区(LR)医护人员的感染风险。方法:收集急诊科、重症监护室(HR组)和临床前、临床准区(LR)医护人员5个时间点(T1 ~ T5)的逆转录聚合酶链反应确诊临床感染数据及核衣壳、刺突蛋白抗体样本。对于血清研究,仅对至少提供一个基线样本和一个在第二波(T4或T5)期间提供样本的参与者进行分析。由于CovishieldTM只引起刺突蛋白抗体,如果无症状未接种CovishieldTM和接种CovishieldTM的个体核衣壳抗体阳性,则诊断为亚临床感染。结果:总体而言,到T5时,HR组(120/366,32.8%)和LR组(22/82,26.8%)的临床感染率相似(P = 0.17)。而在接种前(T3), HR组出现COVID-19感染的HCWs较多(21.9% vs 8.8%, P = 0.046)。血清研究组中,HR组临床感染发生率为31.5% (45/143),LR组为23.7% (14/59)(P = 0.23)。HR组和LR组的Spike抗体阳性率分别为140/143(97.9%)和56/59(94.9%),核衣壳抗体阳性率分别为95/143(66.4%)和35/59 (59.3%)(P = 0.34)。亚临床感染率(HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, P = 0.37)与住院率相似。没有死亡。结论:疫苗接种前,疫区卫生保健员感染风险较高。血清阳性率研究表明亚临床感染并不罕见。
Risk of COVID-19 infection among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background: In the initial stages of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) who were immunologically naive to COVID-19, were exposed to a highly transmissible virus.
Aim: To compare infection risk among HCWs in high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) areas.
Methods: Data on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction confirmed clinical infection and samples for nucleocapsid, and spike protein antibodies were collected at five time-points (T1 to T5) from HCWs in the emergency department and intensive care unit (HR group) and pre-clinical and para-clinical areas (LR). For the sero-study, only participants who provided at least one baseline sample and one during the second wave (T4 or T5) were analysed. Since CovishieldTM elicits only spike protein antibodies, subclinical infection was diagnosed if asymptomatic unvaccinated and CovishieldTM vaccinated individuals tested positive for nucleocapsid antibody.
Results: Overall, by T5, clinical infection rate was similar in the HR (120/366, 32.8%) and LR (22/82, 26.8%) groups (P = 0.17). However, before vaccination (T3), more HCWs in the HR group developed COVID-19 infection (21.9% vs 8.8%, P = 0.046). In the sero-study group, clinical infection occurred in 31.5% (45/143) and 23.7% (14/59) in the HR and LR groups respectively (P = 0.23). Spike antibody was detected in 140/143 (97.9%) and 56/59 (94.9%) and nucleocapsid antibody was positive in 95/143 (66.4%) and 35/59 (59.3%) in the HR and LR groups respectively (P = 0.34). Subclinical infection rate (HR 34.9%, LR 35.6%, P = 0.37) and hospitalization rate were similar. There was no mortality.
Conclusion: Before vaccination, HCWs in HR areas had a higher risk of infection. Seroprevalence studies suggest that sub-clinical infection was not uncommon.