基于图像的性侵犯的旁观者干预:一个范围审查。

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sofie Boye Kromann, Asher Flynn
{"title":"基于图像的性侵犯的旁观者干预:一个范围审查。","authors":"Sofie Boye Kromann, Asher Flynn","doi":"10.1177/15248380251343191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that bystanders to image-based sexual abuse (IBSA), a prevailing form of technology-facilitated sexual violence, can significantly prevent or mitigate harm through intervention. Yet little empirical research focusing on bystanders and IBSA exists. This scoping review aims to consolidate current knowledge of bystanders and IBSA by synthesizing findings related to terminology, prevalence, attitudes, modes of intervention, and facilitators and barriers to intervention. A systematic search of scholarly and gray literature identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria of being published in English or Danish and explicitly focusing on bystander perspectives. The review reveals inconsistent IBSA terminology across studies, complicating cross-study comparisons. Prevalence findings indicate that witnessing IBSA is most common among young adults, and where intimate images are nonconsensually shared (a specific form of IBSA). While most bystanders recognize IBSA as wrong, intervention declines when victims are female and perceived as having high sexual agency. Furthermore, despite expressing intentions to intervene, many bystanders ultimately choose inaction due to fear of social or physical backlash or uncertainty about how to act. Facilitators include empathy for the victim and anticipated support for intervention. The findings underscore the need for preventive initiatives to address gendered social norms around IBSA, offer clear and practical bystander guidance, and raise awareness of non-police resources such as counseling helplines. Notably, demographic data on gender diversity, sexuality, Indigeneity, ethnicity/race, and disability were insufficiently explored, leaving a critical gap for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380251343191"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bystander Intervention in Image-Based Sexual Abuse: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Boye Kromann, Asher Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248380251343191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research suggests that bystanders to image-based sexual abuse (IBSA), a prevailing form of technology-facilitated sexual violence, can significantly prevent or mitigate harm through intervention. Yet little empirical research focusing on bystanders and IBSA exists. This scoping review aims to consolidate current knowledge of bystanders and IBSA by synthesizing findings related to terminology, prevalence, attitudes, modes of intervention, and facilitators and barriers to intervention. A systematic search of scholarly and gray literature identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria of being published in English or Danish and explicitly focusing on bystander perspectives. The review reveals inconsistent IBSA terminology across studies, complicating cross-study comparisons. Prevalence findings indicate that witnessing IBSA is most common among young adults, and where intimate images are nonconsensually shared (a specific form of IBSA). While most bystanders recognize IBSA as wrong, intervention declines when victims are female and perceived as having high sexual agency. Furthermore, despite expressing intentions to intervene, many bystanders ultimately choose inaction due to fear of social or physical backlash or uncertainty about how to act. Facilitators include empathy for the victim and anticipated support for intervention. The findings underscore the need for preventive initiatives to address gendered social norms around IBSA, offer clear and practical bystander guidance, and raise awareness of non-police resources such as counseling helplines. Notably, demographic data on gender diversity, sexuality, Indigeneity, ethnicity/race, and disability were insufficiently explored, leaving a critical gap for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248380251343191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma Violence & Abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251343191\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380251343191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,基于图像的性虐待(IBSA)是一种普遍存在的技术促进的性暴力形式,旁观者可以通过干预显著预防或减轻伤害。然而,很少有实证研究关注旁观者和IBSA。本综述旨在通过综合与术语、流行程度、态度、干预模式以及干预的促进因素和障碍有关的研究结果,巩固目前对旁观者和IBSA的认识。通过对学术文献和灰色文献的系统搜索,我们发现了17项符合纳入标准的研究,即以英语或丹麦语发表,并明确关注旁观者的视角。该综述揭示了不同研究间不一致的IBSA术语,使交叉研究比较复杂化。患病率调查结果表明,目睹IBSA在年轻人中最常见,并且在未经同意的情况下分享亲密图像(IBSA的一种特殊形式)。虽然大多数旁观者都认为IBSA是错误的,但当受害者是女性并且被认为具有高性能力时,干预就会减少。此外,尽管表达了干预的意图,但由于害怕社会或身体上的反弹或不确定如何行动,许多旁观者最终选择了不作为。促进因素包括对受害者的同情和对干预的预期支持。研究结果强调需要采取预防措施,解决IBSA周围的性别社会规范问题,提供明确实用的旁观者指导,并提高对非警察资源(如咨询热线)的认识。值得注意的是,关于性别多样性、性行为、土著、民族/种族和残疾的人口统计数据没有得到充分的探索,为未来的研究留下了重要的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bystander Intervention in Image-Based Sexual Abuse: A Scoping Review.

Research suggests that bystanders to image-based sexual abuse (IBSA), a prevailing form of technology-facilitated sexual violence, can significantly prevent or mitigate harm through intervention. Yet little empirical research focusing on bystanders and IBSA exists. This scoping review aims to consolidate current knowledge of bystanders and IBSA by synthesizing findings related to terminology, prevalence, attitudes, modes of intervention, and facilitators and barriers to intervention. A systematic search of scholarly and gray literature identified 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria of being published in English or Danish and explicitly focusing on bystander perspectives. The review reveals inconsistent IBSA terminology across studies, complicating cross-study comparisons. Prevalence findings indicate that witnessing IBSA is most common among young adults, and where intimate images are nonconsensually shared (a specific form of IBSA). While most bystanders recognize IBSA as wrong, intervention declines when victims are female and perceived as having high sexual agency. Furthermore, despite expressing intentions to intervene, many bystanders ultimately choose inaction due to fear of social or physical backlash or uncertainty about how to act. Facilitators include empathy for the victim and anticipated support for intervention. The findings underscore the need for preventive initiatives to address gendered social norms around IBSA, offer clear and practical bystander guidance, and raise awareness of non-police resources such as counseling helplines. Notably, demographic data on gender diversity, sexuality, Indigeneity, ethnicity/race, and disability were insufficiently explored, leaving a critical gap for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信