设计-虚构方法作为前瞻性人体工程学中创造性设计活动的支持:一项探索性研究。

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Cynthia Lopez-Bagousse, Thomas Arciszewski, Nathalie Bonnardel
{"title":"设计-虚构方法作为前瞻性人体工程学中创造性设计活动的支持:一项探索性研究。","authors":"Cynthia Lopez-Bagousse, Thomas Arciszewski, Nathalie Bonnardel","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2512425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a context of accelerated and unpredictable changes, organisations consider 'alternative futures' in order to enhance their anticipation strategies. This approach could be applied to prospective ergonomics in order, on the one hand, to consider very long-term scenarios involving the design of complex future situations, often characterised by 'ill-defined' and 'open' problems, and, on the other hand, to train ergonomists in prospective practice. With this in mind, an exploratory study compared two prospective approaches: one called prospective design, based on a continuity of the present in order to envision probable and/or preferable futures (referring to the concept of probable/preferable future activity, classically used in prospective ergonomics), and the other called design-fiction, inspired by science fiction to imagine alternative futures. The results indicate that design-fiction encourages the development of well-argued creative ideas, and stimulates critical thinking, by encouraging participants to envisage alternative futures, while stimulating in-depth reflection on potential future issues.</p><p><strong>Practitioner summary: </strong>The article examines design fiction's role in design activities in prospective ergonomics. It examines how science fiction narratives and artefacts can impact collective creativity and collaboration, fostering argumentative exchanges and the development of ideas which taking into account both novelty and usefulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design-fiction approach as a support for creative design activities in prospective ergonomics: an exploratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Lopez-Bagousse, Thomas Arciszewski, Nathalie Bonnardel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2512425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a context of accelerated and unpredictable changes, organisations consider 'alternative futures' in order to enhance their anticipation strategies. This approach could be applied to prospective ergonomics in order, on the one hand, to consider very long-term scenarios involving the design of complex future situations, often characterised by 'ill-defined' and 'open' problems, and, on the other hand, to train ergonomists in prospective practice. With this in mind, an exploratory study compared two prospective approaches: one called prospective design, based on a continuity of the present in order to envision probable and/or preferable futures (referring to the concept of probable/preferable future activity, classically used in prospective ergonomics), and the other called design-fiction, inspired by science fiction to imagine alternative futures. The results indicate that design-fiction encourages the development of well-argued creative ideas, and stimulates critical thinking, by encouraging participants to envisage alternative futures, while stimulating in-depth reflection on potential future issues.</p><p><strong>Practitioner summary: </strong>The article examines design fiction's role in design activities in prospective ergonomics. It examines how science fiction narratives and artefacts can impact collective creativity and collaboration, fostering argumentative exchanges and the development of ideas which taking into account both novelty and usefulness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2512425\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2512425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加速和不可预测的变化的背景下,组织考虑“替代未来”,以提高他们的预期策略。这种方法可以应用于前瞻性人体工程学,一方面,考虑涉及复杂未来情况设计的非常长期的场景,通常以“不明确”和“开放”问题为特征,另一方面,在前瞻性实践中培训人体工程学专家。考虑到这一点,一项探索性研究比较了两种前瞻性方法:一种称为前瞻性设计,基于现在的连续性,以设想可能和/或更理想的未来(指可能/更理想的未来活动的概念,通常用于前瞻性人体工程学),另一种称为设计小说,受科幻小说的启发,想象可替代的未来。结果表明,通过鼓励参与者设想不同的未来,同时激发对未来潜在问题的深入思考,设计小说鼓励了充分论证的创造性想法的发展,并激发了批判性思维。从业者总结:本文考察了设计虚构在前瞻性人体工程学设计活动中的作用。它研究了科幻小说的叙述和人工制品如何影响集体创造力和合作,促进辩论交流和思想的发展,同时考虑到新颖性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design-fiction approach as a support for creative design activities in prospective ergonomics: an exploratory study.

In a context of accelerated and unpredictable changes, organisations consider 'alternative futures' in order to enhance their anticipation strategies. This approach could be applied to prospective ergonomics in order, on the one hand, to consider very long-term scenarios involving the design of complex future situations, often characterised by 'ill-defined' and 'open' problems, and, on the other hand, to train ergonomists in prospective practice. With this in mind, an exploratory study compared two prospective approaches: one called prospective design, based on a continuity of the present in order to envision probable and/or preferable futures (referring to the concept of probable/preferable future activity, classically used in prospective ergonomics), and the other called design-fiction, inspired by science fiction to imagine alternative futures. The results indicate that design-fiction encourages the development of well-argued creative ideas, and stimulates critical thinking, by encouraging participants to envisage alternative futures, while stimulating in-depth reflection on potential future issues.

Practitioner summary: The article examines design fiction's role in design activities in prospective ergonomics. It examines how science fiction narratives and artefacts can impact collective creativity and collaboration, fostering argumentative exchanges and the development of ideas which taking into account both novelty and usefulness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信