双层主动脉切开术后颈动脉内膜切除术的中长期疗效评价。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Hüseyin Ali Tünel, İzzet Hafez, Adem İlkay Diken, Muhammed Onur Hanedan
{"title":"双层主动脉切开术后颈动脉内膜切除术的中长期疗效评价。","authors":"Hüseyin Ali Tünel, İzzet Hafez, Adem İlkay Diken, Muhammed Onur Hanedan","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and January 2021, a total of 94 patients (58 males, 36 females; mean age: 66.5±8.5 years; range, 40 to 82 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography were utilized during follow-up. Stenoses of 50% and above were defined as restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean carotid clamp time was 11.72±2.30 and the mean follow-up was 54.18±27.71 months. Two patients (2.1%) underwent revision due to bleeding and hematoma. No new cerebrovascular events were observed in the postoperative period (<30 days). During the follow-up, six (6.4%) patients with ≥50% stenosis on the same side and 14 (14.9%) patients with stenosis on the opposite side were identified. Primary patency rates were found to be 99% at one year, 95.4% at three years, 90% at five years, 71% at seven years, and 71% at nine years. Age was the only independent risk factor affecting survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest that this technique can be used safely in patients with appropriate internal carotid artery diameter with favorable mid- and long-term patency rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"33 2","pages":"133-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of mid- and long-term outcomes following carotid endarterectomy with a double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.\",\"authors\":\"Hüseyin Ali Tünel, İzzet Hafez, Adem İlkay Diken, Muhammed Onur Hanedan\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and January 2021, a total of 94 patients (58 males, 36 females; mean age: 66.5±8.5 years; range, 40 to 82 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography were utilized during follow-up. Stenoses of 50% and above were defined as restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean carotid clamp time was 11.72±2.30 and the mean follow-up was 54.18±27.71 months. Two patients (2.1%) underwent revision due to bleeding and hematoma. No new cerebrovascular events were observed in the postoperative period (<30 days). During the follow-up, six (6.4%) patients with ≥50% stenosis on the same side and 14 (14.9%) patients with stenosis on the opposite side were identified. Primary patency rates were found to be 99% at one year, 95.4% at three years, 90% at five years, 71% at seven years, and 71% at nine years. Age was the only independent risk factor affecting survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest that this technique can be used safely in patients with appropriate internal carotid artery diameter with favorable mid- and long-term patency rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"133-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估颈动脉内膜切除术合并双层初级动脉切开术的患者的中长期预后。方法:2011年1月至2021年1月,共94例患者(男58例,女36例;平均年龄:66.5±8.5岁;回顾性分析40 - 82岁的颈动脉内膜切除术患者。随访采用多普勒超声、计算机断层或磁共振血管造影、数字减影血管造影。狭窄50%及以上定义为再狭窄。结果:颈动脉夹持时间平均为11.72±2.30个月,平均随访时间为54.18±27.71个月。2例(2.1%)患者因出血和血肿接受翻修。结论:我们的研究结果表明,该技术可以安全地用于内颈动脉直径合适且中长期通畅的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of mid- and long-term outcomes following carotid endarterectomy with a double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.

Methods: Between January 2011 and January 2021, a total of 94 patients (58 males, 36 females; mean age: 66.5±8.5 years; range, 40 to 82 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography were utilized during follow-up. Stenoses of 50% and above were defined as restenosis.

Results: The mean carotid clamp time was 11.72±2.30 and the mean follow-up was 54.18±27.71 months. Two patients (2.1%) underwent revision due to bleeding and hematoma. No new cerebrovascular events were observed in the postoperative period (<30 days). During the follow-up, six (6.4%) patients with ≥50% stenosis on the same side and 14 (14.9%) patients with stenosis on the opposite side were identified. Primary patency rates were found to be 99% at one year, 95.4% at three years, 90% at five years, 71% at seven years, and 71% at nine years. Age was the only independent risk factor affecting survival.

Conclusion: Our study results suggest that this technique can be used safely in patients with appropriate internal carotid artery diameter with favorable mid- and long-term patency rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信