交叉技术双侧卵巢静脉线圈栓塞治疗盆腔静脉疾病:一年随访结果。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Serkan Ketenciler, Mehmet Ali Yeşiltaş, Ahmet Ozan Koyuncu, Özgür Gursu, İlhan Sanisoğlu
{"title":"交叉技术双侧卵巢静脉线圈栓塞治疗盆腔静脉疾病:一年随访结果。","authors":"Serkan Ketenciler, Mehmet Ali Yeşiltaş, Ahmet Ozan Koyuncu, Özgür Gursu, İlhan Sanisoğlu","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate one-year clinical follow-up of patients who underwent bilateral ovarian vein embolization using crossover maneuvers between the ovarian veins via unilateral puncture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and September 2022, a total of 34 women (mean age: 39.6±4.9 years; range, 26 to 52 years) who had pelvic venous disease and underwent bilateral embolization of ovarian veins with unilateral puncture and collateral crossover were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were followed at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively. Symptoms were evaluated using physical examination findings and Visual Analog Scale scores and the need for reintervention was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 34 patients, 21 (61.8%) reported dysmenorrhea and 18 (53%) reported both dyspareunia and lower limb varices. There were no major complications during the procedure. The mean preoperative Visual Analog Scale score was 8.1±0.8, which decreased to 2.1±0.6 at 12 months. Reintervention was necessary for only one patient during one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although bilateral ovarian vein embolization with crossover to the contralateral side poses greater technical challenges than unilateral ovarian vein closure, it remains a viable technique with favorable outcomes and lower complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"33 2","pages":"176-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilateral ovarian vein coil embolization with crossover technique in pelvic venous disease: One year follow-up results.\",\"authors\":\"Serkan Ketenciler, Mehmet Ali Yeşiltaş, Ahmet Ozan Koyuncu, Özgür Gursu, İlhan Sanisoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to evaluate one-year clinical follow-up of patients who underwent bilateral ovarian vein embolization using crossover maneuvers between the ovarian veins via unilateral puncture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and September 2022, a total of 34 women (mean age: 39.6±4.9 years; range, 26 to 52 years) who had pelvic venous disease and underwent bilateral embolization of ovarian veins with unilateral puncture and collateral crossover were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were followed at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively. Symptoms were evaluated using physical examination findings and Visual Analog Scale scores and the need for reintervention was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 34 patients, 21 (61.8%) reported dysmenorrhea and 18 (53%) reported both dyspareunia and lower limb varices. There were no major complications during the procedure. The mean preoperative Visual Analog Scale score was 8.1±0.8, which decreased to 2.1±0.6 at 12 months. Reintervention was necessary for only one patient during one-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although bilateral ovarian vein embolization with crossover to the contralateral side poses greater technical challenges than unilateral ovarian vein closure, it remains a viable technique with favorable outcomes and lower complication rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"176-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在这项研究中,我们旨在评估通过单侧穿刺卵巢静脉间交叉操作进行双侧卵巢静脉栓塞的患者一年的临床随访。方法:2017年1月至2022年9月,共34例女性(平均年龄:39.6±4.9岁;回顾性分析了26 ~ 52岁的盆腔静脉疾病患者,并通过单侧穿刺和侧支交叉进行双侧卵巢静脉栓塞。分别于术后1、6、12个月进行随访。使用体格检查结果和视觉模拟量表评分评估症状,并评估再干预的必要性。结果:在34例患者中,21例(61.8%)报告痛经,18例(53%)报告性交困难和下肢静脉曲张。手术过程中没有出现重大并发症。术前平均视觉模拟量表评分为8.1±0.8,12个月时降至2.1±0.6。在一年的随访中,只有1例患者需要再干预。结论:虽然双侧卵巢静脉栓塞术与单侧卵巢静脉栓塞术相比技术挑战更大,但仍是一种可行的技术,效果良好,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bilateral ovarian vein coil embolization with crossover technique in pelvic venous disease: One year follow-up results.

Background: In this study, we aimed to evaluate one-year clinical follow-up of patients who underwent bilateral ovarian vein embolization using crossover maneuvers between the ovarian veins via unilateral puncture.

Methods: Between January 2017 and September 2022, a total of 34 women (mean age: 39.6±4.9 years; range, 26 to 52 years) who had pelvic venous disease and underwent bilateral embolization of ovarian veins with unilateral puncture and collateral crossover were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were followed at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively. Symptoms were evaluated using physical examination findings and Visual Analog Scale scores and the need for reintervention was assessed.

Results: Of a total of 34 patients, 21 (61.8%) reported dysmenorrhea and 18 (53%) reported both dyspareunia and lower limb varices. There were no major complications during the procedure. The mean preoperative Visual Analog Scale score was 8.1±0.8, which decreased to 2.1±0.6 at 12 months. Reintervention was necessary for only one patient during one-year follow-up.

Conclusion: Although bilateral ovarian vein embolization with crossover to the contralateral side poses greater technical challenges than unilateral ovarian vein closure, it remains a viable technique with favorable outcomes and lower complication rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信