Pam Dawson, Amanda Fullerton, Harish Krishnamoorthi, Kerrie Plant, Robert Cowan, Nadine Buczak, Christopher Long, Chris J James, Fergio Sismono, Andreas Büchner
{"title":"一项前瞻性、多中心病例对照试验,研究解释语后成人CI受者临床表现变化的因素。","authors":"Pam Dawson, Amanda Fullerton, Harish Krishnamoorthi, Kerrie Plant, Robert Cowan, Nadine Buczak, Christopher Long, Chris J James, Fergio Sismono, Andreas Büchner","doi":"10.1177/23312165251347138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated which of a range of factors could explain performance in two distinct groups of experienced, adult cochlear implant recipients differentiated by performance on words in quiet: 72 with poorer word scores versus 77 with better word scores. Tests measured the potential contribution of sound processor mapping, electrode placement, neural health, impedance, cognitive, and patient-related factors in predicting performance. A systematically measured sound processor MAP was compared to the subject's walk-in MAP. Electrode placement included modiolar distance, basal and apical insertion angle, and presence of scalar translocation. Neural health measurements included bipolar thresholds, polarity effect using asymmetrical pulses, and evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measures such as the interphase gap (IPG) effect, total refractory time, and panoramic ECAP. Impedance measurements included trans impedance matrix and four-point impedance. Cognitive tests comprised vocabulary ability, the Stroop test, and the Symbol Digits Modality Test. Performance was measured with words in quiet and sentence in noise tests and basic auditory sensitivity measures including phoneme discrimination in noise and quiet, amplitude modulation detection thresholds and quick spectral modulation detection. A range of predictor variables accounted for between 33% and 60% of the variability in performance outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses showed four key factors that were consistently predictive of poorer performance across several outcomes: substantially underfitted sound processor MAP thresholds, higher average bipolar thresholds, greater total refractory time, and greater IPG offset. Scalar translocation, cognitive variables, and other patient related factors were also significant predictors across more than one performance outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48678,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Hearing","volume":"29 ","pages":"23312165251347138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective, Multicentre Case-Control Trial Examining Factors That Explain Variable Clinical Performance in Post Lingual Adult CI Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Pam Dawson, Amanda Fullerton, Harish Krishnamoorthi, Kerrie Plant, Robert Cowan, Nadine Buczak, Christopher Long, Chris J James, Fergio Sismono, Andreas Büchner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23312165251347138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated which of a range of factors could explain performance in two distinct groups of experienced, adult cochlear implant recipients differentiated by performance on words in quiet: 72 with poorer word scores versus 77 with better word scores. Tests measured the potential contribution of sound processor mapping, electrode placement, neural health, impedance, cognitive, and patient-related factors in predicting performance. A systematically measured sound processor MAP was compared to the subject's walk-in MAP. Electrode placement included modiolar distance, basal and apical insertion angle, and presence of scalar translocation. Neural health measurements included bipolar thresholds, polarity effect using asymmetrical pulses, and evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measures such as the interphase gap (IPG) effect, total refractory time, and panoramic ECAP. Impedance measurements included trans impedance matrix and four-point impedance. Cognitive tests comprised vocabulary ability, the Stroop test, and the Symbol Digits Modality Test. Performance was measured with words in quiet and sentence in noise tests and basic auditory sensitivity measures including phoneme discrimination in noise and quiet, amplitude modulation detection thresholds and quick spectral modulation detection. A range of predictor variables accounted for between 33% and 60% of the variability in performance outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses showed four key factors that were consistently predictive of poorer performance across several outcomes: substantially underfitted sound processor MAP thresholds, higher average bipolar thresholds, greater total refractory time, and greater IPG offset. Scalar translocation, cognitive variables, and other patient related factors were also significant predictors across more than one performance outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Hearing\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"23312165251347138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251347138\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165251347138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Prospective, Multicentre Case-Control Trial Examining Factors That Explain Variable Clinical Performance in Post Lingual Adult CI Recipients.
This study investigated which of a range of factors could explain performance in two distinct groups of experienced, adult cochlear implant recipients differentiated by performance on words in quiet: 72 with poorer word scores versus 77 with better word scores. Tests measured the potential contribution of sound processor mapping, electrode placement, neural health, impedance, cognitive, and patient-related factors in predicting performance. A systematically measured sound processor MAP was compared to the subject's walk-in MAP. Electrode placement included modiolar distance, basal and apical insertion angle, and presence of scalar translocation. Neural health measurements included bipolar thresholds, polarity effect using asymmetrical pulses, and evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measures such as the interphase gap (IPG) effect, total refractory time, and panoramic ECAP. Impedance measurements included trans impedance matrix and four-point impedance. Cognitive tests comprised vocabulary ability, the Stroop test, and the Symbol Digits Modality Test. Performance was measured with words in quiet and sentence in noise tests and basic auditory sensitivity measures including phoneme discrimination in noise and quiet, amplitude modulation detection thresholds and quick spectral modulation detection. A range of predictor variables accounted for between 33% and 60% of the variability in performance outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses showed four key factors that were consistently predictive of poorer performance across several outcomes: substantially underfitted sound processor MAP thresholds, higher average bipolar thresholds, greater total refractory time, and greater IPG offset. Scalar translocation, cognitive variables, and other patient related factors were also significant predictors across more than one performance outcome.
Trends in HearingAUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGYOTORH-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Trends in Hearing is an open access journal completely dedicated to publishing original research and reviews focusing on human hearing, hearing loss, hearing aids, auditory implants, and aural rehabilitation. Under its former name, Trends in Amplification, the journal established itself as a forum for concise explorations of all areas of translational hearing research by leaders in the field. Trends in Hearing has now expanded its focus to include original research articles, with the goal of becoming the premier venue for research related to human hearing and hearing loss.