重度精神疾病吸烟者新型多组分戒烟干预方案评价

IF 1.2 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mary F Brunette, Jenna G Bourassa, Joelle C Ferron, Kelly A Aschbrenner, Meghan M Santos, Minda A Gowarty, Sarah I Pratt
{"title":"重度精神疾病吸烟者新型多组分戒烟干预方案评价","authors":"Mary F Brunette, Jenna G Bourassa, Joelle C Ferron, Kelly A Aschbrenner, Meghan M Santos, Minda A Gowarty, Sarah I Pratt","doi":"10.1177/15248399251348169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with serious mental illness (SMI) are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit than the general population. More effective and accessible cessation treatments are needed to promote health and prevent disease in this disparity population. To this end, we optimized a multicomponent health promotion intervention tailored for people with SMI, Breathe Well, Live Well, and conducted a quasi-experimental program evaluation to assess program feasibility and effectiveness compared with a usual care comparison condition consisting of \"The 3 As.\" Community mental health center staff trained as health coaches delivered eight telehealth Breathe Well, Live Well sessions over 4 months to individuals. Breathe Well, Live Well content included cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based counseling, pharmacotherapy support, incentivized app use (National Cancer Institute's quitSTART), and social support person coaching. Participants were 170 integrated mental health and primary care service recipients with SMI who smoked daily; 53 Breathe Well, Live Well and 117 comparison participants were enrolled during February 2020 through July 2022. Effectiveness was measured via biologically verified abstinence; feasibility was measured via Breathe Well, Live Well intervention engagement. Participants of Breathe Well, Live Well were about three times more likely to be abstinent at follow-up compared with comparison participants. Among those still smoking, Breathe Well, Live Well participants were about five times more likely to have decreased their daily cigarette consumption by at least half. Intervention engagement was strong for pharmacotherapy, counseling, and incentivized quitSTART app use, indicating that these components were feasible to deliver by community mental health center staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399251348169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program Evaluation for a Novel Multicomponent Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Mary F Brunette, Jenna G Bourassa, Joelle C Ferron, Kelly A Aschbrenner, Meghan M Santos, Minda A Gowarty, Sarah I Pratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399251348169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People with serious mental illness (SMI) are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit than the general population. More effective and accessible cessation treatments are needed to promote health and prevent disease in this disparity population. To this end, we optimized a multicomponent health promotion intervention tailored for people with SMI, Breathe Well, Live Well, and conducted a quasi-experimental program evaluation to assess program feasibility and effectiveness compared with a usual care comparison condition consisting of \\\"The 3 As.\\\" Community mental health center staff trained as health coaches delivered eight telehealth Breathe Well, Live Well sessions over 4 months to individuals. Breathe Well, Live Well content included cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based counseling, pharmacotherapy support, incentivized app use (National Cancer Institute's quitSTART), and social support person coaching. Participants were 170 integrated mental health and primary care service recipients with SMI who smoked daily; 53 Breathe Well, Live Well and 117 comparison participants were enrolled during February 2020 through July 2022. Effectiveness was measured via biologically verified abstinence; feasibility was measured via Breathe Well, Live Well intervention engagement. Participants of Breathe Well, Live Well were about three times more likely to be abstinent at follow-up compared with comparison participants. Among those still smoking, Breathe Well, Live Well participants were about five times more likely to have decreased their daily cigarette consumption by at least half. Intervention engagement was strong for pharmacotherapy, counseling, and incentivized quitSTART app use, indicating that these components were feasible to deliver by community mental health center staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399251348169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251348169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399251348169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与一般人群相比,患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人吸烟的可能性更大,戒烟的可能性更小。需要更有效和更容易获得的戒烟治疗,以促进这一差距人群的健康和预防疾病。为此,我们优化了针对重度精神障碍患者量身定制的多组分健康促进干预,“好好呼吸”,“好好生活”,并进行了准实验方案评估,以评估方案的可行性和有效性,并与由“三个a”组成的常规护理比较条件进行了比较。社区心理健康中心的工作人员接受过健康教练的培训,在4个月的时间里为个人提供了8次“好好呼吸,好好生活”远程医疗课程。“好好呼吸,好好生活”的内容包括基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的咨询、药物治疗支持、激励应用程序使用(国家癌症研究所的quitSTART)以及社会支持人员指导。参与者为170名每日吸烟的重度精神障碍患者的综合心理健康和初级保健服务接受者;在2020年2月至2022年7月期间,53名“好好呼吸,好好生活”参与者和117名对照参与者被招募。通过生物学验证的禁欲来衡量有效性;可行性通过Breathe Well、Live Well干预措施进行测量。“好好呼吸,好好生活”项目的参与者在随访中戒酒的可能性是对照组参与者的三倍。在那些仍在吸烟的人中,“好好呼吸,好好生活”项目的参与者将每日吸烟量减少至少一半的可能性要高出五倍左右。药物治疗、咨询和奖励性戒烟应用程序使用的干预参与程度很高,表明这些组件由社区精神卫生中心工作人员提供是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Program Evaluation for a Novel Multicomponent Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smokers With Serious Mental Illness.

People with serious mental illness (SMI) are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit than the general population. More effective and accessible cessation treatments are needed to promote health and prevent disease in this disparity population. To this end, we optimized a multicomponent health promotion intervention tailored for people with SMI, Breathe Well, Live Well, and conducted a quasi-experimental program evaluation to assess program feasibility and effectiveness compared with a usual care comparison condition consisting of "The 3 As." Community mental health center staff trained as health coaches delivered eight telehealth Breathe Well, Live Well sessions over 4 months to individuals. Breathe Well, Live Well content included cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based counseling, pharmacotherapy support, incentivized app use (National Cancer Institute's quitSTART), and social support person coaching. Participants were 170 integrated mental health and primary care service recipients with SMI who smoked daily; 53 Breathe Well, Live Well and 117 comparison participants were enrolled during February 2020 through July 2022. Effectiveness was measured via biologically verified abstinence; feasibility was measured via Breathe Well, Live Well intervention engagement. Participants of Breathe Well, Live Well were about three times more likely to be abstinent at follow-up compared with comparison participants. Among those still smoking, Breathe Well, Live Well participants were about five times more likely to have decreased their daily cigarette consumption by at least half. Intervention engagement was strong for pharmacotherapy, counseling, and incentivized quitSTART app use, indicating that these components were feasible to deliver by community mental health center staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信