达芬奇机器人系统在胆总管囊肿手术中的优势:与传统腹腔镜技术的多维比较研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Huijuan Wang, Zebing Zheng, Yuanzhu Gan, Xilin Liao, Qing Du, Yu Liao, Xingrong Xia, Daiwei Zhu, Chenyan Tang, Lu Huang, Wankang Zhou, Zeping Li, Yuan Gong, Yuanmei Liu, Zhu Jin
{"title":"达芬奇机器人系统在胆总管囊肿手术中的优势:与传统腹腔镜技术的多维比较研究。","authors":"Huijuan Wang, Zebing Zheng, Yuanzhu Gan, Xilin Liao, Qing Du, Yu Liao, Xingrong Xia, Daiwei Zhu, Chenyan Tang, Lu Huang, Wankang Zhou, Zeping Li, Yuan Gong, Yuanmei Liu, Zhu Jin","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02487-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical technology signifies a substantial advancement in pediatric surgery for the treatment of congenital structural malformations. This research endeavor aims to perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and assess the clinical applicability and value of the Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical method in relation to the conventional laparoscopic surgical technique, particularly in the management of congenital choledochal cysts. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 117 pediatric patients diagnosed with congenital choledochal cysts, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: the robot-assisted surgery group (RS group, n = 45) and the traditional laparoscopic surgery group (LS group, n = 72). Basic demographic and clinical data, perioperative parameters-including operation duration and intraoperative blood loss-and postoperative complications were systematically collected and statistically analyzed for both groups. The operating time in the robotic surgery (RS) group was 224.5 (203.3, 247.7) minutes, significantly longer than the 190.2 (170.5, 219.7) minutes recorded in the laparoscopic surgery (LS) group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No conversions to open surgery occurred in either group. Intraoperative blood loss in the RS group was 11.5 (9.4, 13.4) ml, which was significantly less than the 19.8 (14.7, 26.6) ml observed in the LS group (P < 0.001). The postoperative drainage tube retention time was 4.5 (4, 6) days in the RS group compared to 5.8 (4, 7) days in the LS group, with a statistically significant difference (z = -3.285, P = 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay averaged 9 (7, 11) days for the RS group, while the LS group had an average of 11 (10, 13) days, also showing a statistically significant difference (z = -4.520, P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, complications were reported in 1 case [2.22% (1/45)] in the RS group, whereas 6 cases [8.33% (6/72)] were reported in the LS group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (P = 0.424). Robot-assisted treatment of congenital choledochal cysts is considered both safe and reliable. This technique minimizes the complexity of hepaticojejunal anastomosis and decreases the duration of the anastomosis. Furthermore, it provides several advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, a low rate of postoperative complications, and a faster recovery period.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advantages of the Da Vinci robotic system in choledochal cyst surgery: a multi-dimensional comparative study with traditional laparoscopic techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Huijuan Wang, Zebing Zheng, Yuanzhu Gan, Xilin Liao, Qing Du, Yu Liao, Xingrong Xia, Daiwei Zhu, Chenyan Tang, Lu Huang, Wankang Zhou, Zeping Li, Yuan Gong, Yuanmei Liu, Zhu Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02487-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical technology signifies a substantial advancement in pediatric surgery for the treatment of congenital structural malformations. This research endeavor aims to perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and assess the clinical applicability and value of the Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical method in relation to the conventional laparoscopic surgical technique, particularly in the management of congenital choledochal cysts. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 117 pediatric patients diagnosed with congenital choledochal cysts, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: the robot-assisted surgery group (RS group, n = 45) and the traditional laparoscopic surgery group (LS group, n = 72). Basic demographic and clinical data, perioperative parameters-including operation duration and intraoperative blood loss-and postoperative complications were systematically collected and statistically analyzed for both groups. The operating time in the robotic surgery (RS) group was 224.5 (203.3, 247.7) minutes, significantly longer than the 190.2 (170.5, 219.7) minutes recorded in the laparoscopic surgery (LS) group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No conversions to open surgery occurred in either group. Intraoperative blood loss in the RS group was 11.5 (9.4, 13.4) ml, which was significantly less than the 19.8 (14.7, 26.6) ml observed in the LS group (P < 0.001). The postoperative drainage tube retention time was 4.5 (4, 6) days in the RS group compared to 5.8 (4, 7) days in the LS group, with a statistically significant difference (z = -3.285, P = 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay averaged 9 (7, 11) days for the RS group, while the LS group had an average of 11 (10, 13) days, also showing a statistically significant difference (z = -4.520, P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, complications were reported in 1 case [2.22% (1/45)] in the RS group, whereas 6 cases [8.33% (6/72)] were reported in the LS group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (P = 0.424). Robot-assisted treatment of congenital choledochal cysts is considered both safe and reliable. This technique minimizes the complexity of hepaticojejunal anastomosis and decreases the duration of the anastomosis. Furthermore, it provides several advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, a low rate of postoperative complications, and a faster recovery period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02487-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02487-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

达芬奇机器人辅助手术技术标志着先天性结构畸形治疗儿科外科的重大进步。本研究旨在对达芬奇机器人辅助手术方法与传统腹腔镜手术技术的治疗效果进行综合对比分析,并评估其在先天性胆总管囊肿治疗中的临床适用性和价值。回顾性队列研究纳入2019年1月至2024年10月在遵义医科大学附属医院就诊的诊断为先天性胆总管囊肿的儿童117例。根据手术方式将患者分为两组:机器人辅助手术组(RS组,n = 45)和传统腹腔镜手术组(LS组,n = 72)。系统收集两组患者的基本人口学、临床资料、围手术期参数(手术时间、术中出血量)及术后并发症,并进行统计分析。机器人手术(RS)组的手术时间为224.5 (203.3,247.7)min,明显长于腹腔镜手术(LS)组的190.2 (170.5,219.7)min,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advantages of the Da Vinci robotic system in choledochal cyst surgery: a multi-dimensional comparative study with traditional laparoscopic techniques.

The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical technology signifies a substantial advancement in pediatric surgery for the treatment of congenital structural malformations. This research endeavor aims to perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and assess the clinical applicability and value of the Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical method in relation to the conventional laparoscopic surgical technique, particularly in the management of congenital choledochal cysts. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 117 pediatric patients diagnosed with congenital choledochal cysts, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between January 2019 and October 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: the robot-assisted surgery group (RS group, n = 45) and the traditional laparoscopic surgery group (LS group, n = 72). Basic demographic and clinical data, perioperative parameters-including operation duration and intraoperative blood loss-and postoperative complications were systematically collected and statistically analyzed for both groups. The operating time in the robotic surgery (RS) group was 224.5 (203.3, 247.7) minutes, significantly longer than the 190.2 (170.5, 219.7) minutes recorded in the laparoscopic surgery (LS) group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No conversions to open surgery occurred in either group. Intraoperative blood loss in the RS group was 11.5 (9.4, 13.4) ml, which was significantly less than the 19.8 (14.7, 26.6) ml observed in the LS group (P < 0.001). The postoperative drainage tube retention time was 4.5 (4, 6) days in the RS group compared to 5.8 (4, 7) days in the LS group, with a statistically significant difference (z = -3.285, P = 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay averaged 9 (7, 11) days for the RS group, while the LS group had an average of 11 (10, 13) days, also showing a statistically significant difference (z = -4.520, P < 0.001). During the follow-up period, complications were reported in 1 case [2.22% (1/45)] in the RS group, whereas 6 cases [8.33% (6/72)] were reported in the LS group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (P = 0.424). Robot-assisted treatment of congenital choledochal cysts is considered both safe and reliable. This technique minimizes the complexity of hepaticojejunal anastomosis and decreases the duration of the anastomosis. Furthermore, it provides several advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, a low rate of postoperative complications, and a faster recovery period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信