医疗机构中患者安全的沟通和营销管理:范围审查。

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine
Maria Diniz Nogueira, Ana Marinho Diniz, Cláudia Tartaglia Reis, Susana Ramos, Paulo Sousa
{"title":"医疗机构中患者安全的沟通和营销管理:范围审查。","authors":"Maria Diniz Nogueira, Ana Marinho Diniz, Cláudia Tartaglia Reis, Susana Ramos, Paulo Sousa","doi":"10.1159/000546355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient safety (PS) is a fundamental pillar of healthcare quality. The effective dissemination of information and knowledge management regarding PS is essential to foster safe practices. Despite significant progress in recent years, gaps remain in how knowledge and information on PS are managed and disseminated across healthcare organizations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to map the scientific evidence concerning knowledge management strategies and the dissemination of information related to PS, as implemented by healthcare organizations for healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Searches were performed in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with no time limitations, across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as grey literature sources such as NOVA Discovery (EBSCO) and selected institutional websites. The review was reported in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 247 publications identified, 16 were included. Three principal strategies for PS-related knowledge management emerged: acquisition, dissemination, and mediation. Continuous training and the adoption of innovative educational methodologies were found to enhance knowledge acquisition. Digital platforms and health marketing tools facilitated dissemination. Knowledge mediation was supported by strategic leadership, informal networks, and interdisciplinary partnerships involving risk managers, clinical leaders, and subject matter experts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Knowledge management strategies demonstrated potential to strengthen PS, with continuous training, organizational culture, and innovation standing out in knowledge acquisition. Dissemination was effective through digital platforms and marketing, while mediation relied on leaders and managers. Challenges remain, such as validating the impact and updating the content. Future research should assess the impact of these strategies on clinical practice, including the perspectives of patients and carers.</p>","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication and Marketing Management in Patient Safety within Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Diniz Nogueira, Ana Marinho Diniz, Cláudia Tartaglia Reis, Susana Ramos, Paulo Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient safety (PS) is a fundamental pillar of healthcare quality. The effective dissemination of information and knowledge management regarding PS is essential to foster safe practices. Despite significant progress in recent years, gaps remain in how knowledge and information on PS are managed and disseminated across healthcare organizations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to map the scientific evidence concerning knowledge management strategies and the dissemination of information related to PS, as implemented by healthcare organizations for healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Searches were performed in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with no time limitations, across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as grey literature sources such as NOVA Discovery (EBSCO) and selected institutional websites. The review was reported in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 247 publications identified, 16 were included. Three principal strategies for PS-related knowledge management emerged: acquisition, dissemination, and mediation. Continuous training and the adoption of innovative educational methodologies were found to enhance knowledge acquisition. Digital platforms and health marketing tools facilitated dissemination. Knowledge mediation was supported by strategic leadership, informal networks, and interdisciplinary partnerships involving risk managers, clinical leaders, and subject matter experts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Knowledge management strategies demonstrated potential to strengthen PS, with continuous training, organizational culture, and innovation standing out in knowledge acquisition. Dissemination was effective through digital platforms and marketing, while mediation relied on leaders and managers. Challenges remain, such as validating the impact and updating the content. Future research should assess the impact of these strategies on clinical practice, including the perspectives of patients and carers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Portuguese Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Portuguese Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者安全(PS)是医疗保健质量的基本支柱。有效传播关于PS的信息和知识管理对于促进安全做法至关重要。尽管近年来取得了重大进展,但在如何在医疗保健组织中管理和传播关于PS的知识和信息方面仍然存在差距。目的:本研究的目的是绘制有关知识管理策略和信息传播的科学证据,由卫生保健机构为卫生保健专业人员实施。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法进行范围审查。检索以葡萄牙语、英语和西班牙语进行,没有时间限制,跨数据库包括PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,以及灰色文献来源如NOVA Discovery (EBSCO)和选定的机构网站。该综述的报告符合PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价的首选报告项目)指南。结果:247篇文献中有16篇被纳入。ps相关知识管理出现了三种主要策略:获取、传播和调解。持续的培训和采用创新的教育方法可以促进知识的获取。数字平台和卫生营销工具促进了传播。知识中介得到了战略领导、非正式网络以及涉及风险管理者、临床领导者和主题专家的跨学科伙伴关系的支持。讨论:知识管理策略展示了加强PS的潜力,持续培训、组织文化和创新在知识获取方面表现突出。传播通过数字平台和营销有效,而调解则依赖于领导者和管理者。挑战仍然存在,例如验证影响和更新内容。未来的研究应评估这些策略对临床实践的影响,包括患者和护理人员的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication and Marketing Management in Patient Safety within Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Patient safety (PS) is a fundamental pillar of healthcare quality. The effective dissemination of information and knowledge management regarding PS is essential to foster safe practices. Despite significant progress in recent years, gaps remain in how knowledge and information on PS are managed and disseminated across healthcare organizations.

Objective: The aim of this study was to map the scientific evidence concerning knowledge management strategies and the dissemination of information related to PS, as implemented by healthcare organizations for healthcare professionals.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Searches were performed in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with no time limitations, across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, as well as grey literature sources such as NOVA Discovery (EBSCO) and selected institutional websites. The review was reported in line with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.

Results: Of the 247 publications identified, 16 were included. Three principal strategies for PS-related knowledge management emerged: acquisition, dissemination, and mediation. Continuous training and the adoption of innovative educational methodologies were found to enhance knowledge acquisition. Digital platforms and health marketing tools facilitated dissemination. Knowledge mediation was supported by strategic leadership, informal networks, and interdisciplinary partnerships involving risk managers, clinical leaders, and subject matter experts.

Discussion: Knowledge management strategies demonstrated potential to strengthen PS, with continuous training, organizational culture, and innovation standing out in knowledge acquisition. Dissemination was effective through digital platforms and marketing, while mediation relied on leaders and managers. Challenges remain, such as validating the impact and updating the content. Future research should assess the impact of these strategies on clinical practice, including the perspectives of patients and carers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信