卫生保健受训人员抗hb抗体的持久性:儿童与青少年接种疫苗的影响。

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI:10.3390/vaccines13060562
Luca Di Giampaolo, Luca Coppeta, Paola Borrelli, Piergiorgio Astolfi, Andrea Resta, Lucia Loffredo, Flavia Di Menno Di Bucchianico, Rocco Mangifesta, Lorenzo Ippoliti, Cristiana Ferrari
{"title":"卫生保健受训人员抗hb抗体的持久性:儿童与青少年接种疫苗的影响。","authors":"Luca Di Giampaolo, Luca Coppeta, Paola Borrelli, Piergiorgio Astolfi, Andrea Resta, Lucia Loffredo, Flavia Di Menno Di Bucchianico, Rocco Mangifesta, Lorenzo Ippoliti, Cristiana Ferrari","doi":"10.3390/vaccines13060562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant occupational health concern for healthcare workers (HCWs), including trainees exposed to biological risks. Although vaccination is the most effective preventive measure, the persistence of immunity over time and the need for booster doses remain subjects of debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to assess the prevalence of protective anti-HB antibody titers among healthcare trainees at the \"SS Annunziata\" Hospital in Chieti, comparing those vaccinated in infancy with those vaccinated during adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on 2028 healthcare trainees from 2021 to 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on vaccination timing: infancy (PED group) and adolescence (ADO group). Serological tests were performed to measure anti-HB titers, with a protective threshold set at ≥10 IU/L. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in immunity persistence between the two groups. The results showed that the overall prevalence of protective anti-HB titers was 50.7%, with significant differences between the PED and ADO groups. Protective immunity was observed in 79.2% of individuals vaccinated during adolescence, compared to 44.6% of those vaccinated in infancy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in antibody persistence were found between males and females. Notably, 92.4% of participants with non-protective titers received a booster dose within two months of testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirms a significant decline in anti-HB titers over time among individuals vaccinated in infancy, suggesting a potential need for booster doses later in adulthood. The high adherence to vaccination recommendations among healthcare trainees is a promising finding, reinforcing the importance of continuous education and immunization programmes in healthcare settings. Further research, including longitudinal studies and additional HBV biomarkers, is necessary to optimize vaccination strategies and long-term immunity monitoring in HCWs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23634,"journal":{"name":"Vaccines","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12197707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistence of Anti-HB Antibodies in Healthcare Trainees: The Impact of Childhood Versus Adolescent Vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Di Giampaolo, Luca Coppeta, Paola Borrelli, Piergiorgio Astolfi, Andrea Resta, Lucia Loffredo, Flavia Di Menno Di Bucchianico, Rocco Mangifesta, Lorenzo Ippoliti, Cristiana Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vaccines13060562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant occupational health concern for healthcare workers (HCWs), including trainees exposed to biological risks. Although vaccination is the most effective preventive measure, the persistence of immunity over time and the need for booster doses remain subjects of debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to assess the prevalence of protective anti-HB antibody titers among healthcare trainees at the \\\"SS Annunziata\\\" Hospital in Chieti, comparing those vaccinated in infancy with those vaccinated during adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on 2028 healthcare trainees from 2021 to 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on vaccination timing: infancy (PED group) and adolescence (ADO group). Serological tests were performed to measure anti-HB titers, with a protective threshold set at ≥10 IU/L. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in immunity persistence between the two groups. The results showed that the overall prevalence of protective anti-HB titers was 50.7%, with significant differences between the PED and ADO groups. Protective immunity was observed in 79.2% of individuals vaccinated during adolescence, compared to 44.6% of those vaccinated in infancy (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in antibody persistence were found between males and females. Notably, 92.4% of participants with non-protective titers received a booster dose within two months of testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study confirms a significant decline in anti-HB titers over time among individuals vaccinated in infancy, suggesting a potential need for booster doses later in adulthood. The high adherence to vaccination recommendations among healthcare trainees is a promising finding, reinforcing the importance of continuous education and immunization programmes in healthcare settings. Further research, including longitudinal studies and additional HBV biomarkers, is necessary to optimize vaccination strategies and long-term immunity monitoring in HCWs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccines\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12197707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染仍然是卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的一个重要职业健康问题,包括暴露于生物风险的受训人员。尽管疫苗接种是最有效的预防措施,但免疫能否长期持续以及是否需要加强剂量仍然存在争议。目的:本研究旨在评估基耶蒂“SS Annunziata”医院卫生保健培训生中保护性抗hb抗体滴度的流行情况,比较婴儿期接种疫苗的人与青春期接种疫苗的人。方法:对2021 ~ 2024年2028名卫生培训生进行回顾性观察研究。参与者根据接种时间分为两组:婴儿期(PED组)和青春期(ADO组)。血清学试验测定抗hb滴度,保护阈值设置为≥10 IU/L。对两组免疫持久性的差异进行统计分析。结果显示,保护性抗hb滴度的总体患病率为50.7%,在PED组和ADO组之间存在显著差异。在青春期接种疫苗的个体中,79.2%观察到保护性免疫,而在婴儿期接种疫苗的个体中,这一比例为44.6% (p < 0.001)。男性和女性在抗体持久性方面没有显著差异。值得注意的是,92.4%的非保护性滴度参与者在两个月内接受了加强剂量的测试。结论:该研究证实,在婴儿期接种疫苗的个体中,随着时间的推移,抗hb滴度显著下降,这表明成年后可能需要加强剂量。卫生保健受训者对疫苗接种建议的高度遵守是一个有希望的发现,加强了卫生保健环境中继续教育和免疫规划的重要性。进一步的研究,包括纵向研究和其他HBV生物标志物,有必要优化卫生保健工作者的疫苗接种策略和长期免疫监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistence of Anti-HB Antibodies in Healthcare Trainees: The Impact of Childhood Versus Adolescent Vaccination.

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant occupational health concern for healthcare workers (HCWs), including trainees exposed to biological risks. Although vaccination is the most effective preventive measure, the persistence of immunity over time and the need for booster doses remain subjects of debate.

Objective: The present study aims to assess the prevalence of protective anti-HB antibody titers among healthcare trainees at the "SS Annunziata" Hospital in Chieti, comparing those vaccinated in infancy with those vaccinated during adolescence.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 2028 healthcare trainees from 2021 to 2024. Participants were divided into two groups based on vaccination timing: infancy (PED group) and adolescence (ADO group). Serological tests were performed to measure anti-HB titers, with a protective threshold set at ≥10 IU/L. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in immunity persistence between the two groups. The results showed that the overall prevalence of protective anti-HB titers was 50.7%, with significant differences between the PED and ADO groups. Protective immunity was observed in 79.2% of individuals vaccinated during adolescence, compared to 44.6% of those vaccinated in infancy (p < 0.001). No significant differences in antibody persistence were found between males and females. Notably, 92.4% of participants with non-protective titers received a booster dose within two months of testing.

Conclusions: The study confirms a significant decline in anti-HB titers over time among individuals vaccinated in infancy, suggesting a potential need for booster doses later in adulthood. The high adherence to vaccination recommendations among healthcare trainees is a promising finding, reinforcing the importance of continuous education and immunization programmes in healthcare settings. Further research, including longitudinal studies and additional HBV biomarkers, is necessary to optimize vaccination strategies and long-term immunity monitoring in HCWs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccines
Vaccines Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1853
审稿时长
18.06 days
期刊介绍: Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focused on laboratory and clinical vaccine research, utilization and immunization. Vaccines publishes high quality reviews, regular research papers, communications and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信