Seyed Hadi Asghari, Saeed Ilbeigi, Mohsen Mohammadnia Ahmadi, Mohammad Yousefi, Mohammad Mousavi-Mirzaei
{"title":"感觉运动和虚拟现实干预对改善MS患者步态、平衡和生活质量的比较效果。","authors":"Seyed Hadi Asghari, Saeed Ilbeigi, Mohsen Mohammadnia Ahmadi, Mohammad Yousefi, Mohammad Mousavi-Mirzaei","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-05048-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder that affects the central nervous system, causing inflammation and damage to the myelin sheath, leading to balance and gait impairments. Sensory-motor (SN) and virtual reality (VR) interventions have shown promise in addressing these balance issues by engaging all three components of the balance control systems. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sensory-motor and virtual reality training on the functional status and quality of life of MS patients. In this study, 36 MS patients receiving Rituximab therapy with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 2 to 6 were randomly assigned to three groups: SN (n = 10), VR (n = 8), and a control group (n = 10). The SN and VR groups underwent 8 weeks of intervention, with 3 sessions per week, while the control group continued routine care. Assessments using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) test, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 Instrument (MSQOL54), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were conducted at baseline and after 8 weeks. Significant within-group improvements were observed in both SN and VR groups for primary outcomes, including the T25FW (P = 0.002 for SN; P = 0.001 for VR) and TUG (P = 0.005 for SN; P = 0.001 for VR), as well as secondary outcomes such as overall (P < 0.001 for both), physical (P < 0.001 for both), and mental (P < 0.001 for both) MSQOL-54 components, and PSQI (P < 0.001 for SN; P = 0.046 for VR). However, no significant differences emerged between SN and VR groups for primary outcomes, except for PSQI, which favored SN (P = 0.02). Compared to the control group, the SN group demonstrated significant improvements in primary outcomes-T25FW (P < 0.001) and TUG (P = 0.01)-and secondary outcomes, including overall (P < 0.001), physical (P < 0.001), and mental (P = 0.002) MSQOL-54 components, and PSQI (P = 0.007). Similarly, compared to the control group, the VR group demonstrated significant improvements in the T25FW (P = 0.02) and TUG (P = 0.05) tests, as well as in secondary outcomes, including overall (P = 0.005), physical (P = 0.003), and mental (P = 0.01) MSQOL-54 components. However, no significant improvement in PSQI was observed (P = 0.9). This study highlights the significant transformative potential of integrating VR and SN interventions as innovative therapeutic modalities for addressing critical motor impairments, specifically balance and gait, in individuals with MS. By employing task-oriented paradigms, dual-task methodologies, and multisensory frameworks, these interventions not only yield substantial improvements in functional mobility and quality of life but also represent a groundbreaking synthesis of immersive, technology-driven motivation with the pragmatic adaptability of evidence-based SN techniques. Further longitudinal investigations are warranted to delineate their sustained effects, refine their application in broader MS populations, and assess their scalability to establish patient-centered, cost-effective, and outcome-driven neurorehabilitation models.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"20310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effects of sensory motor and virtual reality interventions to improve gait, balance and quality of life MS patients.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Hadi Asghari, Saeed Ilbeigi, Mohsen Mohammadnia Ahmadi, Mohammad Yousefi, Mohammad Mousavi-Mirzaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-05048-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder that affects the central nervous system, causing inflammation and damage to the myelin sheath, leading to balance and gait impairments. Sensory-motor (SN) and virtual reality (VR) interventions have shown promise in addressing these balance issues by engaging all three components of the balance control systems. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sensory-motor and virtual reality training on the functional status and quality of life of MS patients. In this study, 36 MS patients receiving Rituximab therapy with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 2 to 6 were randomly assigned to three groups: SN (n = 10), VR (n = 8), and a control group (n = 10). The SN and VR groups underwent 8 weeks of intervention, with 3 sessions per week, while the control group continued routine care. Assessments using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) test, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 Instrument (MSQOL54), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were conducted at baseline and after 8 weeks. Significant within-group improvements were observed in both SN and VR groups for primary outcomes, including the T25FW (P = 0.002 for SN; P = 0.001 for VR) and TUG (P = 0.005 for SN; P = 0.001 for VR), as well as secondary outcomes such as overall (P < 0.001 for both), physical (P < 0.001 for both), and mental (P < 0.001 for both) MSQOL-54 components, and PSQI (P < 0.001 for SN; P = 0.046 for VR). However, no significant differences emerged between SN and VR groups for primary outcomes, except for PSQI, which favored SN (P = 0.02). Compared to the control group, the SN group demonstrated significant improvements in primary outcomes-T25FW (P < 0.001) and TUG (P = 0.01)-and secondary outcomes, including overall (P < 0.001), physical (P < 0.001), and mental (P = 0.002) MSQOL-54 components, and PSQI (P = 0.007). Similarly, compared to the control group, the VR group demonstrated significant improvements in the T25FW (P = 0.02) and TUG (P = 0.05) tests, as well as in secondary outcomes, including overall (P = 0.005), physical (P = 0.003), and mental (P = 0.01) MSQOL-54 components. However, no significant improvement in PSQI was observed (P = 0.9). This study highlights the significant transformative potential of integrating VR and SN interventions as innovative therapeutic modalities for addressing critical motor impairments, specifically balance and gait, in individuals with MS. By employing task-oriented paradigms, dual-task methodologies, and multisensory frameworks, these interventions not only yield substantial improvements in functional mobility and quality of life but also represent a groundbreaking synthesis of immersive, technology-driven motivation with the pragmatic adaptability of evidence-based SN techniques. Further longitudinal investigations are warranted to delineate their sustained effects, refine their application in broader MS populations, and assess their scalability to establish patient-centered, cost-effective, and outcome-driven neurorehabilitation models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"20310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05048-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05048-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effects of sensory motor and virtual reality interventions to improve gait, balance and quality of life MS patients.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder that affects the central nervous system, causing inflammation and damage to the myelin sheath, leading to balance and gait impairments. Sensory-motor (SN) and virtual reality (VR) interventions have shown promise in addressing these balance issues by engaging all three components of the balance control systems. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of sensory-motor and virtual reality training on the functional status and quality of life of MS patients. In this study, 36 MS patients receiving Rituximab therapy with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 2 to 6 were randomly assigned to three groups: SN (n = 10), VR (n = 8), and a control group (n = 10). The SN and VR groups underwent 8 weeks of intervention, with 3 sessions per week, while the control group continued routine care. Assessments using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) test, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 Instrument (MSQOL54), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were conducted at baseline and after 8 weeks. Significant within-group improvements were observed in both SN and VR groups for primary outcomes, including the T25FW (P = 0.002 for SN; P = 0.001 for VR) and TUG (P = 0.005 for SN; P = 0.001 for VR), as well as secondary outcomes such as overall (P < 0.001 for both), physical (P < 0.001 for both), and mental (P < 0.001 for both) MSQOL-54 components, and PSQI (P < 0.001 for SN; P = 0.046 for VR). However, no significant differences emerged between SN and VR groups for primary outcomes, except for PSQI, which favored SN (P = 0.02). Compared to the control group, the SN group demonstrated significant improvements in primary outcomes-T25FW (P < 0.001) and TUG (P = 0.01)-and secondary outcomes, including overall (P < 0.001), physical (P < 0.001), and mental (P = 0.002) MSQOL-54 components, and PSQI (P = 0.007). Similarly, compared to the control group, the VR group demonstrated significant improvements in the T25FW (P = 0.02) and TUG (P = 0.05) tests, as well as in secondary outcomes, including overall (P = 0.005), physical (P = 0.003), and mental (P = 0.01) MSQOL-54 components. However, no significant improvement in PSQI was observed (P = 0.9). This study highlights the significant transformative potential of integrating VR and SN interventions as innovative therapeutic modalities for addressing critical motor impairments, specifically balance and gait, in individuals with MS. By employing task-oriented paradigms, dual-task methodologies, and multisensory frameworks, these interventions not only yield substantial improvements in functional mobility and quality of life but also represent a groundbreaking synthesis of immersive, technology-driven motivation with the pragmatic adaptability of evidence-based SN techniques. Further longitudinal investigations are warranted to delineate their sustained effects, refine their application in broader MS populations, and assess their scalability to establish patient-centered, cost-effective, and outcome-driven neurorehabilitation models.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.