基于机器学习的手持式光谱仪塑料类型识别。

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensors Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.3390/s25123777
Hedde van Hoorn, Fahimeh Pourmohammadi, Arie-Willem de Leeuw, Amey Vasulkar, Jerry de Vos, Steven van den Berg
{"title":"基于机器学习的手持式光谱仪塑料类型识别。","authors":"Hedde van Hoorn, Fahimeh Pourmohammadi, Arie-Willem de Leeuw, Amey Vasulkar, Jerry de Vos, Steven van den Berg","doi":"10.3390/s25123777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plastic waste and pollution is growing rapidly worldwide and most plastics end up in landfill or are incinerated because high-quality recycling is not possible. Plastic-type identification with a low-cost, handheld spectral approach could help in parts of the world where high-end spectral imaging systems on conveyor belts cannot be implemented. Here, we investigate how two fundamentally different handheld infrared spectral devices can identify plastic types by benchmarking the same analysis against a high-resolution bench-top spectral approach. We used the handheld Plastic Scanner, which measures a discrete infrared spectrum using LED illumination at different wavelengths, and the SpectraPod, which has an integrated photonics chip which has varying responsivity in different channels in the near-infrared. We employ machine learning using SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest and Gaussian Naïve Bayes models on a full dataset of plastic samples of PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP and PS, with samples of varying shape, color and opacity, as measured with three different experimental approaches. The high-resolution spectral approach can obtain an accuracy (mean ± standard deviation) of (0.97 ± 0.01), whereas we obtain (0.93 ± 0.01) for the SpectraPod and (0.70 ± 0.03) for the Plastic Scanner. Differences of reflectance at subsequent wavelengths prove to be the most important features in the plastic-type classification model when using high-resolution spectroscopy, which is not possible with the other two devices. Lower accuracy for the handheld devices is caused by their limitations, as the spectral range of both devices is limited-up to 1600 nm for the SpectraPod, while the Plastic Scanner has limited sensitivity to reflectance at wavelengths of 1100 and 1350 nm, where certain plastic types show characteristic absorbance bands. We suggest that combining selective sensitivity channels (as in the SpectraPod) and illuminating the sample with varying LEDs (as with the Plastic Scanner) could increase the accuracy in plastic-type identification with a handheld device.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based Identification of Plastic Types Using Handheld Spectrometers.\",\"authors\":\"Hedde van Hoorn, Fahimeh Pourmohammadi, Arie-Willem de Leeuw, Amey Vasulkar, Jerry de Vos, Steven van den Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/s25123777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plastic waste and pollution is growing rapidly worldwide and most plastics end up in landfill or are incinerated because high-quality recycling is not possible. Plastic-type identification with a low-cost, handheld spectral approach could help in parts of the world where high-end spectral imaging systems on conveyor belts cannot be implemented. Here, we investigate how two fundamentally different handheld infrared spectral devices can identify plastic types by benchmarking the same analysis against a high-resolution bench-top spectral approach. We used the handheld Plastic Scanner, which measures a discrete infrared spectrum using LED illumination at different wavelengths, and the SpectraPod, which has an integrated photonics chip which has varying responsivity in different channels in the near-infrared. We employ machine learning using SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest and Gaussian Naïve Bayes models on a full dataset of plastic samples of PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP and PS, with samples of varying shape, color and opacity, as measured with three different experimental approaches. The high-resolution spectral approach can obtain an accuracy (mean ± standard deviation) of (0.97 ± 0.01), whereas we obtain (0.93 ± 0.01) for the SpectraPod and (0.70 ± 0.03) for the Plastic Scanner. Differences of reflectance at subsequent wavelengths prove to be the most important features in the plastic-type classification model when using high-resolution spectroscopy, which is not possible with the other two devices. Lower accuracy for the handheld devices is caused by their limitations, as the spectral range of both devices is limited-up to 1600 nm for the SpectraPod, while the Plastic Scanner has limited sensitivity to reflectance at wavelengths of 1100 and 1350 nm, where certain plastic types show characteristic absorbance bands. We suggest that combining selective sensitivity channels (as in the SpectraPod) and illuminating the sample with varying LEDs (as with the Plastic Scanner) could increase the accuracy in plastic-type identification with a handheld device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sensors\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123777\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塑料垃圾和污染在世界范围内迅速增长,大多数塑料最终被填埋或焚烧,因为高质量的回收是不可能的。采用低成本手持式光谱方法的塑料类型识别可以帮助世界上无法在传送带上实施高端光谱成像系统的部分地区。在这里,我们研究了两种根本不同的手持式红外光谱设备如何通过对高分辨率台式光谱方法进行相同分析来识别塑料类型。我们使用了手持式塑料扫描仪,它使用不同波长的LED照明来测量离散红外光谱,以及SpectraPod,它有一个集成的光子芯片,在近红外的不同通道中具有不同的响应性。我们使用SVM、XGBoost、随机森林和高斯Naïve贝叶斯模型对PET、HDPE、PVC、LDPE、PP和PS的塑料样本的完整数据集进行机器学习,并使用三种不同的实验方法测量不同形状、颜色和不透明度的样本。高分辨率光谱方法的精度(平均值±标准差)为(0.97±0.01),而SpectraPod的精度为(0.93±0.01),Plastic Scanner的精度为(0.70±0.03)。当使用高分辨率光谱学时,在后续波长的反射率差异被证明是塑料类型分类模型中最重要的特征,这在其他两个设备中是不可能的。由于其局限性,手持设备的精度较低,因为SpectraPod的两种设备的光谱范围都限制在1600 nm,而塑料扫描仪对1100和1350 nm波长的反射灵敏度有限,其中某些塑料类型显示出特征吸光度带。我们建议结合选择性灵敏度通道(如SpectraPod)和用不同的led照亮样品(如塑料扫描仪)可以提高手持设备塑料类型识别的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning-Based Identification of Plastic Types Using Handheld Spectrometers.

Plastic waste and pollution is growing rapidly worldwide and most plastics end up in landfill or are incinerated because high-quality recycling is not possible. Plastic-type identification with a low-cost, handheld spectral approach could help in parts of the world where high-end spectral imaging systems on conveyor belts cannot be implemented. Here, we investigate how two fundamentally different handheld infrared spectral devices can identify plastic types by benchmarking the same analysis against a high-resolution bench-top spectral approach. We used the handheld Plastic Scanner, which measures a discrete infrared spectrum using LED illumination at different wavelengths, and the SpectraPod, which has an integrated photonics chip which has varying responsivity in different channels in the near-infrared. We employ machine learning using SVM, XGBoost, Random Forest and Gaussian Naïve Bayes models on a full dataset of plastic samples of PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP and PS, with samples of varying shape, color and opacity, as measured with three different experimental approaches. The high-resolution spectral approach can obtain an accuracy (mean ± standard deviation) of (0.97 ± 0.01), whereas we obtain (0.93 ± 0.01) for the SpectraPod and (0.70 ± 0.03) for the Plastic Scanner. Differences of reflectance at subsequent wavelengths prove to be the most important features in the plastic-type classification model when using high-resolution spectroscopy, which is not possible with the other two devices. Lower accuracy for the handheld devices is caused by their limitations, as the spectral range of both devices is limited-up to 1600 nm for the SpectraPod, while the Plastic Scanner has limited sensitivity to reflectance at wavelengths of 1100 and 1350 nm, where certain plastic types show characteristic absorbance bands. We suggest that combining selective sensitivity channels (as in the SpectraPod) and illuminating the sample with varying LEDs (as with the Plastic Scanner) could increase the accuracy in plastic-type identification with a handheld device.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信