真空和非真空尿液收集系统对尿液分析的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Berkay Korkmaz, Alev Kural, Ahmet Başman, Bülent Ediz, Abdullah Olgun
{"title":"真空和非真空尿液收集系统对尿液分析的影响。","authors":"Berkay Korkmaz, Alev Kural, Ahmet Başman, Bülent Ediz, Abdullah Olgun","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2524850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of vacuum urine collection system on urine sediment and chemical dipstick analysis results by comparing it with a non-vacuum urine collection system. Vacuum urine collection systems are commonly used due to their user-friendly design, standardization, and low contamination risk, but their impact on the accuracy of urinalysis is not well-documented. A total of 124 urine specimens were collected from patients using vacuum and non-vacuum (Argeron UriCollecT) urine collection systems. The samples were analyzed using Dirui FUS-200 sediment and Dirui H-800 dipstick analyzers within 1 h of collection. Microscopic sediment analyses were confirmed when needed. Microscopic urine sediment analyses showed no significant difference between vacuum and non-vacuum systems for leukocytes, squamous epithelium, non-squamous epithelium, and hyaline casts. However, significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed for red blood cells, crystals, and granular casts. In chemical dipstick analysis, no significant difference was found for hemoglobin, bilirubin, ketone, urobilinogen, protein, nitrite, leukocyte, glucose, and pH. However, significant difference was observed in specific gravity (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Vacuum urine collection systems can cause statistically significant variations in certain sediment and chemical dipstick parameters. These differences should be considered in clinical evaluations, and further research with larger and diverse patient samples is needed to assess the clinical implications and effects on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of vacuum and non-vacuum urine collection systems on urinalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Berkay Korkmaz, Alev Kural, Ahmet Başman, Bülent Ediz, Abdullah Olgun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2524850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of vacuum urine collection system on urine sediment and chemical dipstick analysis results by comparing it with a non-vacuum urine collection system. Vacuum urine collection systems are commonly used due to their user-friendly design, standardization, and low contamination risk, but their impact on the accuracy of urinalysis is not well-documented. A total of 124 urine specimens were collected from patients using vacuum and non-vacuum (Argeron UriCollecT) urine collection systems. The samples were analyzed using Dirui FUS-200 sediment and Dirui H-800 dipstick analyzers within 1 h of collection. Microscopic sediment analyses were confirmed when needed. Microscopic urine sediment analyses showed no significant difference between vacuum and non-vacuum systems for leukocytes, squamous epithelium, non-squamous epithelium, and hyaline casts. However, significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed for red blood cells, crystals, and granular casts. In chemical dipstick analysis, no significant difference was found for hemoglobin, bilirubin, ketone, urobilinogen, protein, nitrite, leukocyte, glucose, and pH. However, significant difference was observed in specific gravity (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Vacuum urine collection systems can cause statistically significant variations in certain sediment and chemical dipstick parameters. These differences should be considered in clinical evaluations, and further research with larger and diverse patient samples is needed to assess the clinical implications and effects on patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2524850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2524850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过与非真空尿液收集系统的比较,探讨真空尿液收集系统对尿液沉积物和化学试纸分析结果的影响。真空尿液收集系统由于其用户友好的设计、标准化和低污染风险而被广泛使用,但其对尿液分析准确性的影响并没有得到很好的证明。采用真空和非真空(Argeron UriCollecT)尿液收集系统共收集124份患者尿液标本。样品在采集后1 h内采用迪瑞FUS-200沉淀物和迪瑞h -800量尺分析仪进行分析。在需要的时候,显微镜下的沉积物分析得到了证实。显微镜下尿液沉积物分析显示,在白细胞、鳞状上皮、非鳞状上皮和透明铸型中,真空和非真空系统无显著差异。然而,显著差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of vacuum and non-vacuum urine collection systems on urinalysis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of vacuum urine collection system on urine sediment and chemical dipstick analysis results by comparing it with a non-vacuum urine collection system. Vacuum urine collection systems are commonly used due to their user-friendly design, standardization, and low contamination risk, but their impact on the accuracy of urinalysis is not well-documented. A total of 124 urine specimens were collected from patients using vacuum and non-vacuum (Argeron UriCollecT) urine collection systems. The samples were analyzed using Dirui FUS-200 sediment and Dirui H-800 dipstick analyzers within 1 h of collection. Microscopic sediment analyses were confirmed when needed. Microscopic urine sediment analyses showed no significant difference between vacuum and non-vacuum systems for leukocytes, squamous epithelium, non-squamous epithelium, and hyaline casts. However, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for red blood cells, crystals, and granular casts. In chemical dipstick analysis, no significant difference was found for hemoglobin, bilirubin, ketone, urobilinogen, protein, nitrite, leukocyte, glucose, and pH. However, significant difference was observed in specific gravity (p < 0.05). Vacuum urine collection systems can cause statistically significant variations in certain sediment and chemical dipstick parameters. These differences should be considered in clinical evaluations, and further research with larger and diverse patient samples is needed to assess the clinical implications and effects on patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信