自我报告的生活质量在渐进式认知衰退中——我们不要把婴儿连同洗澡水一起倒掉。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-04009-7
Irina Kinchin
{"title":"自我报告的生活质量在渐进式认知衰退中——我们不要把婴儿连同洗澡水一起倒掉。","authors":"Irina Kinchin","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04009-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing quality of life in progressive conditions like dementia presents unique challenges for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR). This commentary discusses current practices, highlighted by recent appraisals of lecanemab by NICE, where concerns about proxy-reported data-specifically, the risk of underestimating benefits-were noted as a limitation in the evaluation. While progressive cognitive decline complicates traditional self-reporting methodologies, emerging evidence demonstrates that adaptive strategies and technology-assisted methods can extend reliable self-reporting windows. The analysis identifies four critical challenges: (1) cognitive heterogeneity across dementia subtypes and stages clashing with HEOR's stable preference assumptions; (2) temporal fluctuations undermining single-timepoint assessments; (3) systematic discrepancies between self- and proxy-reported outcome data, inadequately addressed by current methods; and (4) the conceptual and psychometric limitations of current generic and condition-specific instruments. To address these challenges, the author advocates for a paradigm shift, inviting HEOR community to view diverse expressions of preference as a catalyst for innovation. This involves moving beyond static, binary preference assumptions to embrace dynamic, multimodal methods capturing non-verbal expressions in more advanced dementia. Proposed solutions include proxy calibration, an ecosystem of hybrid and graduated assessment integrating standardized domains with adaptable modules; reforming proxy protocols using Pickard's dual-gap framework to position proxy input as complementary, not substitutive; employing modern psychometrics and adopting relationship-centred engagement and process consent. Crucially, it calls for HEOR to integrate adaptive methods from adjacent fields-such as phenomenological inquiry, sensor technology, and data triangulation. These approaches can enhance the ability of HEOR to measure, value, and assess quality of life in the context of dementia and other progressive neurodegenerative conditions, ultimately anchoring value in lived experience and ensuring methodological limitations do not become barriers to accessing care and treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"2549-2558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported quality of life in progressive cognitive decline-let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.\",\"authors\":\"Irina Kinchin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-025-04009-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing quality of life in progressive conditions like dementia presents unique challenges for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR). This commentary discusses current practices, highlighted by recent appraisals of lecanemab by NICE, where concerns about proxy-reported data-specifically, the risk of underestimating benefits-were noted as a limitation in the evaluation. While progressive cognitive decline complicates traditional self-reporting methodologies, emerging evidence demonstrates that adaptive strategies and technology-assisted methods can extend reliable self-reporting windows. The analysis identifies four critical challenges: (1) cognitive heterogeneity across dementia subtypes and stages clashing with HEOR's stable preference assumptions; (2) temporal fluctuations undermining single-timepoint assessments; (3) systematic discrepancies between self- and proxy-reported outcome data, inadequately addressed by current methods; and (4) the conceptual and psychometric limitations of current generic and condition-specific instruments. To address these challenges, the author advocates for a paradigm shift, inviting HEOR community to view diverse expressions of preference as a catalyst for innovation. This involves moving beyond static, binary preference assumptions to embrace dynamic, multimodal methods capturing non-verbal expressions in more advanced dementia. Proposed solutions include proxy calibration, an ecosystem of hybrid and graduated assessment integrating standardized domains with adaptable modules; reforming proxy protocols using Pickard's dual-gap framework to position proxy input as complementary, not substitutive; employing modern psychometrics and adopting relationship-centred engagement and process consent. Crucially, it calls for HEOR to integrate adaptive methods from adjacent fields-such as phenomenological inquiry, sensor technology, and data triangulation. These approaches can enhance the ability of HEOR to measure, value, and assess quality of life in the context of dementia and other progressive neurodegenerative conditions, ultimately anchoring value in lived experience and ensuring methodological limitations do not become barriers to accessing care and treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2549-2558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04009-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04009-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估痴呆等进行性疾病的生活质量对健康经济学和结果研究(HEOR)提出了独特的挑战。这篇评论讨论了目前的实践,NICE最近对lecanemab的评估突出了这一点,其中对代理报告数据的担忧-特别是低估益处的风险-被认为是评估中的一个局限性。虽然进行性认知衰退使传统的自我报告方法复杂化,但新出现的证据表明,适应性策略和技术辅助方法可以扩展可靠的自我报告窗口。该分析确定了四个关键挑战:(1)不同痴呆亚型和阶段的认知异质性与HEOR的稳定偏好假设相冲突;(2)时间波动不利于单时间点评估;(3)自我报告和代理报告的结果数据之间存在系统性差异,目前的方法无法充分解决;(4)当前通用和特定条件的仪器在概念和心理测量上的局限性。为了应对这些挑战,作者主张进行范式转变,邀请高等教育社区将不同的偏好表达视为创新的催化剂。这包括超越静态的二元偏好假设,采用动态的多模态方法来捕捉晚期痴呆症患者的非语言表达。提出的解决方案包括代理校准,这是一个混合和分级评估的生态系统,将标准化领域与自适应模块集成在一起;使用皮卡德的双间隙框架改革代理协议,将代理输入定位为互补,而不是替代;采用现代心理测量学,采用以关系为中心的参与和过程同意。至关重要的是,它要求HEOR整合来自相邻领域的自适应方法,如现象学查询、传感器技术和数据三角测量。这些方法可以增强HEOR在痴呆症和其他进行性神经退行性疾病背景下衡量、评估和评估生活质量的能力,最终将价值锚定在生活经验中,并确保方法局限性不会成为获得护理和治疗的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-reported quality of life in progressive cognitive decline-let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Assessing quality of life in progressive conditions like dementia presents unique challenges for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR). This commentary discusses current practices, highlighted by recent appraisals of lecanemab by NICE, where concerns about proxy-reported data-specifically, the risk of underestimating benefits-were noted as a limitation in the evaluation. While progressive cognitive decline complicates traditional self-reporting methodologies, emerging evidence demonstrates that adaptive strategies and technology-assisted methods can extend reliable self-reporting windows. The analysis identifies four critical challenges: (1) cognitive heterogeneity across dementia subtypes and stages clashing with HEOR's stable preference assumptions; (2) temporal fluctuations undermining single-timepoint assessments; (3) systematic discrepancies between self- and proxy-reported outcome data, inadequately addressed by current methods; and (4) the conceptual and psychometric limitations of current generic and condition-specific instruments. To address these challenges, the author advocates for a paradigm shift, inviting HEOR community to view diverse expressions of preference as a catalyst for innovation. This involves moving beyond static, binary preference assumptions to embrace dynamic, multimodal methods capturing non-verbal expressions in more advanced dementia. Proposed solutions include proxy calibration, an ecosystem of hybrid and graduated assessment integrating standardized domains with adaptable modules; reforming proxy protocols using Pickard's dual-gap framework to position proxy input as complementary, not substitutive; employing modern psychometrics and adopting relationship-centred engagement and process consent. Crucially, it calls for HEOR to integrate adaptive methods from adjacent fields-such as phenomenological inquiry, sensor technology, and data triangulation. These approaches can enhance the ability of HEOR to measure, value, and assess quality of life in the context of dementia and other progressive neurodegenerative conditions, ultimately anchoring value in lived experience and ensuring methodological limitations do not become barriers to accessing care and treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信