自付费用对坦桑尼亚患癌症儿童的影响:一项混合方法的经济研究。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326755
Emily R Smith, Pamela Espinoza, Happiness D Kajoka, Henry E Rice, Madeline Metcalf, Anna Tupetz, Cesia Cotache-Condor, Blandina T Mmbaga, Catherine Staton, Esther Majaliwa
{"title":"自付费用对坦桑尼亚患癌症儿童的影响:一项混合方法的经济研究。","authors":"Emily R Smith, Pamela Espinoza, Happiness D Kajoka, Henry E Rice, Madeline Metcalf, Anna Tupetz, Cesia Cotache-Condor, Blandina T Mmbaga, Catherine Staton, Esther Majaliwa","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0326755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries, medical and non-medical expenses are often paid through out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, which pose significant barriers to timely care. Our study aims to estimate the impact of OOP expenditures for cancer care for children in Tanzania through a mixed-methods approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an explanatory mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of OOP expenditures for children receiving cancer care at the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Tanzania based on the Three Delays Framework. Quantitative data were collected to measure OOP expenditures and to assess the risk of catastrophic health expenditure or depth of impoverishment associated. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate financial barriers and facilitators to care and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated to compare themes, identify areas of agreement or dissonance, and assess for complementarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen caregivers of children with cancer at KCMC formed the study cohort. Most lived in a rural setting (92%) and were farmers or livestock keepers (68%). Quantitative analysis showed that total median OOP health expenditures were $53.01 (IQR: 26.50-106.01). All families were pushed further into poverty from the OOP expenses as shown by widening poverty gaps. Qualitative interviews revealed several themes related to financial challenges for families with cancer, particularly during the time period prior to definitive care including worry about job losses and having to sell assets to reach care. Data triangulation confirmed strong agreement between qualitative and quantitative data on the impact of financial barriers on care. However, families stated higher OOP costs in qualitative interviews compared to quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protecting families from impoverishment by reducing OOP costs during time periods prior to receiving definitive care may be a strategic way to improve timely diagnosis and early treatment for children with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0326755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study.\",\"authors\":\"Emily R Smith, Pamela Espinoza, Happiness D Kajoka, Henry E Rice, Madeline Metcalf, Anna Tupetz, Cesia Cotache-Condor, Blandina T Mmbaga, Catherine Staton, Esther Majaliwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0326755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries, medical and non-medical expenses are often paid through out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, which pose significant barriers to timely care. Our study aims to estimate the impact of OOP expenditures for cancer care for children in Tanzania through a mixed-methods approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an explanatory mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of OOP expenditures for children receiving cancer care at the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Tanzania based on the Three Delays Framework. Quantitative data were collected to measure OOP expenditures and to assess the risk of catastrophic health expenditure or depth of impoverishment associated. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate financial barriers and facilitators to care and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated to compare themes, identify areas of agreement or dissonance, and assess for complementarity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen caregivers of children with cancer at KCMC formed the study cohort. Most lived in a rural setting (92%) and were farmers or livestock keepers (68%). Quantitative analysis showed that total median OOP health expenditures were $53.01 (IQR: 26.50-106.01). All families were pushed further into poverty from the OOP expenses as shown by widening poverty gaps. Qualitative interviews revealed several themes related to financial challenges for families with cancer, particularly during the time period prior to definitive care including worry about job losses and having to sell assets to reach care. Data triangulation confirmed strong agreement between qualitative and quantitative data on the impact of financial barriers on care. However, families stated higher OOP costs in qualitative interviews compared to quantitative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protecting families from impoverishment by reducing OOP costs during time periods prior to receiving definitive care may be a strategic way to improve timely diagnosis and early treatment for children with cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0326755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于低收入和中等收入国家的癌症儿童,医疗和非医疗费用往往通过自付(OOP)支出支付,这对及时护理构成重大障碍。我们的研究旨在通过混合方法估计坦桑尼亚儿童癌症护理的OOP支出的影响。方法:我们采用解释性混合方法设计,评估基于三个延迟框架的坦桑尼亚乞力马扎罗山基督教医疗中心接受癌症治疗的儿童OOP支出的影响。收集了定量数据,以衡量面向对象的支出,并评估与灾难性卫生支出或贫困程度相关的风险。进行了定性访谈,以评估财务障碍和护理促进者,并使用主题内容分析进行了分析。定性和定量数据被三角化,以比较主题,确定一致或不一致的领域,并评估互补性。结果:KCMC的13名癌症儿童护理人员组成了研究队列。大多数人生活在农村(92%),是农民或牲畜饲养者(68%)。定量分析显示,总中位数的OOP卫生支出为53.01美元(IQR: 26.50-106.01)。从日益扩大的贫困差距可以看出,所有家庭都因OOP开支而进一步陷入贫困。定性访谈揭示了癌症家庭面临的几个与财务挑战相关的主题,特别是在最终治疗之前的一段时间,包括担心失业和不得不出售资产以获得治疗。数据三角测量证实,关于财务障碍对护理的影响的定性和定量数据非常一致。然而,与定量数据相比,家庭在定性访谈中表示OOP成本更高。结论:在接受最终治疗之前,通过降低OOP费用来保护家庭免于贫困,可能是提高癌症儿童及时诊断和早期治疗的战略途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study.

Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study.

Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study.

Impact of out-of-pocket expenses on children with cancer in Tanzania: A mixed-methods economic study.

Background: For children with cancer in low- and middle-income countries, medical and non-medical expenses are often paid through out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures, which pose significant barriers to timely care. Our study aims to estimate the impact of OOP expenditures for cancer care for children in Tanzania through a mixed-methods approach.

Methods: We used an explanatory mixed-method design to evaluate the impact of OOP expenditures for children receiving cancer care at the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Tanzania based on the Three Delays Framework. Quantitative data were collected to measure OOP expenditures and to assess the risk of catastrophic health expenditure or depth of impoverishment associated. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate financial barriers and facilitators to care and were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated to compare themes, identify areas of agreement or dissonance, and assess for complementarity.

Results: Thirteen caregivers of children with cancer at KCMC formed the study cohort. Most lived in a rural setting (92%) and were farmers or livestock keepers (68%). Quantitative analysis showed that total median OOP health expenditures were $53.01 (IQR: 26.50-106.01). All families were pushed further into poverty from the OOP expenses as shown by widening poverty gaps. Qualitative interviews revealed several themes related to financial challenges for families with cancer, particularly during the time period prior to definitive care including worry about job losses and having to sell assets to reach care. Data triangulation confirmed strong agreement between qualitative and quantitative data on the impact of financial barriers on care. However, families stated higher OOP costs in qualitative interviews compared to quantitative data.

Conclusions: Protecting families from impoverishment by reducing OOP costs during time periods prior to receiving definitive care may be a strategic way to improve timely diagnosis and early treatment for children with cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信