印度南部普拉萨德眼科研究所网络从初级到二级眼科保健转诊的障碍。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325974
Debananda Padhy, Giridhar Pyda, Rohit C Khanna
{"title":"印度南部普拉萨德眼科研究所网络从初级到二级眼科保健转诊的障碍。","authors":"Debananda Padhy, Giridhar Pyda, Rohit C Khanna","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the barriers preventing referral uptake from primary care vision centres (VC) to higher level secondary centres (SC) in rural South India.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study conducted using data from 10 VCs surrounding an SC in Thoodukurthy village, Mahabubnagar district, Telangana, India. The study included 2,508 participants who received primary eye care at the VCs and referred to SC between July 1st to December 31st, 2019, and from July 1st to December 31st, 2020 respectively. Of these,1930 (76.9%) participants were available for the study. Participants were categorized as compliant if they visited the SC within one year of referral. Non-compliance was defined as failing to do so within that time. Interviews were conducted with non-compliant participants to understand their reasons for not seeking further care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1930 participants 1507 (78%) were interviewed; 938 (62.2%) were compliant, and 569 (37.8%) were non-compliant. The mean age was 54.64 years (SD:14.28 years) and 716 (47.5%) were female. Multivariable analysis showed participants not referred for teleophthalmology (OR:1.41,95%CI:1.00-1.99), unmarried participants (OR:1.32,95%CI:1.02-1.71) and participants without formal education (OR:1.44,95%CI:1.09-1.90) were more likely to be non-compliant. Participants living further from VCs (OR:0.98,95%CI: 0.98-0.99) had better compliance. The major barriers were attitudinal (60.5%), economic (12.1%) and other medical or Health-related barriers (9.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary barriers to referral uptake were related to attitudes, economics, and medical. Participants not referred to teleophthalmology, unmarried, those without formal education, and those lived closer to VCs were more likely to be non-compliant. Addressing these barriers could improve the utilization of higher-level care services in this rural population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to referral uptake from primary to secondary eye care in the L V Prasad Eye Institute Network in South India.\",\"authors\":\"Debananda Padhy, Giridhar Pyda, Rohit C Khanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the barriers preventing referral uptake from primary care vision centres (VC) to higher level secondary centres (SC) in rural South India.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study conducted using data from 10 VCs surrounding an SC in Thoodukurthy village, Mahabubnagar district, Telangana, India. The study included 2,508 participants who received primary eye care at the VCs and referred to SC between July 1st to December 31st, 2019, and from July 1st to December 31st, 2020 respectively. Of these,1930 (76.9%) participants were available for the study. Participants were categorized as compliant if they visited the SC within one year of referral. Non-compliance was defined as failing to do so within that time. Interviews were conducted with non-compliant participants to understand their reasons for not seeking further care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1930 participants 1507 (78%) were interviewed; 938 (62.2%) were compliant, and 569 (37.8%) were non-compliant. The mean age was 54.64 years (SD:14.28 years) and 716 (47.5%) were female. Multivariable analysis showed participants not referred for teleophthalmology (OR:1.41,95%CI:1.00-1.99), unmarried participants (OR:1.32,95%CI:1.02-1.71) and participants without formal education (OR:1.44,95%CI:1.09-1.90) were more likely to be non-compliant. Participants living further from VCs (OR:0.98,95%CI: 0.98-0.99) had better compliance. The major barriers were attitudinal (60.5%), economic (12.1%) and other medical or Health-related barriers (9.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary barriers to referral uptake were related to attitudes, economics, and medical. Participants not referred to teleophthalmology, unmarried, those without formal education, and those lived closer to VCs were more likely to be non-compliant. Addressing these barriers could improve the utilization of higher-level care services in this rural population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0325974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325974\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查印度南部农村初级保健视力中心(VC)到高级二级中心(SC)转诊的障碍。方法:这是一项横断面研究,使用了印度特伦甘纳邦mahabunagar区Thoodukurthy村一个SC周围10个vc的数据。该研究包括2508名参与者,他们分别在2019年7月1日至12月31日和2020年7月1日至12月31日期间在vc接受初级眼科护理,并向SC就诊。其中,1930名(76.9%)参与者可用于研究。如果参与者在转介后一年内到SC访问,则被归类为合规。不遵守的定义是未能在该时间内这样做。对不服从的参与者进行访谈,以了解他们不寻求进一步治疗的原因。结果:1930名参与者中,1507名(78%)被访谈;938例(62.2%)符合要求,569例(37.8%)不符合要求。平均年龄54.64岁(SD:14.28岁),女性716例(47.5%)。多变量分析显示,未接受远视治疗的参与者(OR:1.41,95%CI:1.00-1.99)、未婚参与者(OR:1.32,95%CI:1.02-1.71)和未接受过正规教育的参与者(OR:1.44,95%CI:1.09-1.90)更有可能不服从。离风险投资中心较远的参与者(OR:0.98,95%CI: 0.98-0.99)的依从性较好。主要障碍是态度(60.5%)、经济(12.1%)和其他医疗或健康相关障碍(9.3%)。结论:接受转诊的主要障碍与态度、经济状况和医疗条件有关。未接受远程眼科治疗、未婚、未接受过正规教育以及住在风险投资公司附近的参与者更有可能不服从。解决这些障碍可以提高这些农村人口对高水平护理服务的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers to referral uptake from primary to secondary eye care in the L V Prasad Eye Institute Network in South India.

Barriers to referral uptake from primary to secondary eye care in the L V Prasad Eye Institute Network in South India.

Barriers to referral uptake from primary to secondary eye care in the L V Prasad Eye Institute Network in South India.

Barriers to referral uptake from primary to secondary eye care in the L V Prasad Eye Institute Network in South India.

Purpose: To investigate the barriers preventing referral uptake from primary care vision centres (VC) to higher level secondary centres (SC) in rural South India.

Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study conducted using data from 10 VCs surrounding an SC in Thoodukurthy village, Mahabubnagar district, Telangana, India. The study included 2,508 participants who received primary eye care at the VCs and referred to SC between July 1st to December 31st, 2019, and from July 1st to December 31st, 2020 respectively. Of these,1930 (76.9%) participants were available for the study. Participants were categorized as compliant if they visited the SC within one year of referral. Non-compliance was defined as failing to do so within that time. Interviews were conducted with non-compliant participants to understand their reasons for not seeking further care.

Results: Among the 1930 participants 1507 (78%) were interviewed; 938 (62.2%) were compliant, and 569 (37.8%) were non-compliant. The mean age was 54.64 years (SD:14.28 years) and 716 (47.5%) were female. Multivariable analysis showed participants not referred for teleophthalmology (OR:1.41,95%CI:1.00-1.99), unmarried participants (OR:1.32,95%CI:1.02-1.71) and participants without formal education (OR:1.44,95%CI:1.09-1.90) were more likely to be non-compliant. Participants living further from VCs (OR:0.98,95%CI: 0.98-0.99) had better compliance. The major barriers were attitudinal (60.5%), economic (12.1%) and other medical or Health-related barriers (9.3%).

Conclusion: The primary barriers to referral uptake were related to attitudes, economics, and medical. Participants not referred to teleophthalmology, unmarried, those without formal education, and those lived closer to VCs were more likely to be non-compliant. Addressing these barriers could improve the utilization of higher-level care services in this rural population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信