有先天性颈椎病理的运动员重返运动建议:专家意见的修正德尔菲共识调查。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scott L Zuckerman, Jacob Jo, Grant H Rigney, Julian E Bailes, Christopher M Bonfield, Robert C Cantu, Patrick C H Chan, Andrew M Cordover, Domagoj Coric, Hank Feuer, Raymond J Gardocki, Andrew C Hecht, Wellington K Hsu, Jacob R Joseph, Ronald A Lehman, Allan D Levi, Susan M Liew, Philip K Louie, Steven C Ludwig, Joseph Maroon, Vincent J Miele, Jeff Mullin, Venu M Nemani, Frank M Phillips, Sheeraz Qureshi, K Daniel Riew, Myron A Rogers, Rick C Sasso, Gabriel A Smith, Jay D Turner, Alexander R Vaccaro, Robert G Watkins, Nicholas Theodore, David O Okonkwo, Allen K Sills, Gavin A Davis
{"title":"有先天性颈椎病理的运动员重返运动建议:专家意见的修正德尔菲共识调查。","authors":"Scott L Zuckerman, Jacob Jo, Grant H Rigney, Julian E Bailes, Christopher M Bonfield, Robert C Cantu, Patrick C H Chan, Andrew M Cordover, Domagoj Coric, Hank Feuer, Raymond J Gardocki, Andrew C Hecht, Wellington K Hsu, Jacob R Joseph, Ronald A Lehman, Allan D Levi, Susan M Liew, Philip K Louie, Steven C Ludwig, Joseph Maroon, Vincent J Miele, Jeff Mullin, Venu M Nemani, Frank M Phillips, Sheeraz Qureshi, K Daniel Riew, Myron A Rogers, Rick C Sasso, Gabriel A Smith, Jay D Turner, Alexander R Vaccaro, Robert G Watkins, Nicholas Theodore, David O Okonkwo, Allen K Sills, Gavin A Davis","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recommendations guiding participation in sports for athletes with congenital cervical spine pathology are lacking, and management of these athletes remains challenging. Thus, the objective was to perform a modified Delphi consensus survey of expert opinion on return-to-sport (RTS) decisions in athletes with congenital cervical spine pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, modified Delphi consensus survey investigating RTS decisions in athletes with various types of congenital cervical spine pathology was undertaken. An international panel of neurosurgery/orthopedic spine surgeons with sport expertise was identified. The cervical spine pathologies studied were craniocervical anomalies, Klippel-Feil syndrome, os odontoideum, Chiari malformation, and congenital cervical stenosis. A 2 × 2 scheme was used to classify sport risk based on impact forces and frequency: low impact/low frequency, low impact/high frequency, high impact/low frequency, and high impact/high frequency. Consensus was a-priori defined at ≥70%. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 34 sports spine surgeons invited (56% neurosurgeons and 44% orthopedic surgeons), survey completion was 100%. The following scenarios achieved ≥70% consensus to recommend athletes to return-to-play high impact/high frequency sports: C1 ring anomaly and no prior neurapraxic event, occipitalized C1, Klippel-Feil of 1 motion segment with/without kyphosis, and asymptomatic Chiari malformation without syrinx. Consensus was also achieved that an athlete with congenital stenosis who has experienced at least 2 neurapraxic events should be advised not to RTS. Although consensus was not achieved in other areas, notable findings are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The following scenarios reached ≥70% consensus recommending athletes to return to high impact/high frequency sports: C1 ring anomaly without a prior neurapraxic event, occipitalized C1, Klippel-Feil syndrome involving 1 motion segment, and asymptomatic Chiari malformation without a syrinx. In addition, consensus was reached advising athletes with congenital stenosis with 2 or more neurapraxic events not to RTS. Although consensus was not obtained in other areas, notable findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return-to-Sport Recommendations for Athletes With Congenital Cervical Spine Pathology: A Modified Delphi Consensus Survey of Expert Opinion.\",\"authors\":\"Scott L Zuckerman, Jacob Jo, Grant H Rigney, Julian E Bailes, Christopher M Bonfield, Robert C Cantu, Patrick C H Chan, Andrew M Cordover, Domagoj Coric, Hank Feuer, Raymond J Gardocki, Andrew C Hecht, Wellington K Hsu, Jacob R Joseph, Ronald A Lehman, Allan D Levi, Susan M Liew, Philip K Louie, Steven C Ludwig, Joseph Maroon, Vincent J Miele, Jeff Mullin, Venu M Nemani, Frank M Phillips, Sheeraz Qureshi, K Daniel Riew, Myron A Rogers, Rick C Sasso, Gabriel A Smith, Jay D Turner, Alexander R Vaccaro, Robert G Watkins, Nicholas Theodore, David O Okonkwo, Allen K Sills, Gavin A Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neu.0000000000003576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recommendations guiding participation in sports for athletes with congenital cervical spine pathology are lacking, and management of these athletes remains challenging. Thus, the objective was to perform a modified Delphi consensus survey of expert opinion on return-to-sport (RTS) decisions in athletes with congenital cervical spine pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, modified Delphi consensus survey investigating RTS decisions in athletes with various types of congenital cervical spine pathology was undertaken. An international panel of neurosurgery/orthopedic spine surgeons with sport expertise was identified. The cervical spine pathologies studied were craniocervical anomalies, Klippel-Feil syndrome, os odontoideum, Chiari malformation, and congenital cervical stenosis. A 2 × 2 scheme was used to classify sport risk based on impact forces and frequency: low impact/low frequency, low impact/high frequency, high impact/low frequency, and high impact/high frequency. Consensus was a-priori defined at ≥70%. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 34 sports spine surgeons invited (56% neurosurgeons and 44% orthopedic surgeons), survey completion was 100%. The following scenarios achieved ≥70% consensus to recommend athletes to return-to-play high impact/high frequency sports: C1 ring anomaly and no prior neurapraxic event, occipitalized C1, Klippel-Feil of 1 motion segment with/without kyphosis, and asymptomatic Chiari malformation without syrinx. Consensus was also achieved that an athlete with congenital stenosis who has experienced at least 2 neurapraxic events should be advised not to RTS. Although consensus was not achieved in other areas, notable findings are discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The following scenarios reached ≥70% consensus recommending athletes to return to high impact/high frequency sports: C1 ring anomaly without a prior neurapraxic event, occipitalized C1, Klippel-Feil syndrome involving 1 motion segment, and asymptomatic Chiari malformation without a syrinx. In addition, consensus was reached advising athletes with congenital stenosis with 2 or more neurapraxic events not to RTS. Although consensus was not obtained in other areas, notable findings are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:缺乏指导先天性颈椎病变运动员参与运动的建议,这些运动员的管理仍然具有挑战性。因此,目的是对先天性颈椎病变运动员重返运动(RTS)决策的专家意见进行修改的德尔菲共识调查。方法:采用横断面、修正的德尔菲共识调查,对患有不同类型先天性颈椎病变的运动员进行RTS决策。确定了具有运动专业知识的神经外科/骨科脊柱外科医生的国际小组。颈椎病变包括颅颈异常、Klippel-Feil综合征、齿状突缺失、Chiari畸形和先天性颈椎狭窄。采用基于冲击力和频率的2 × 2方案对运动风险进行分类:低冲击/低频、低冲击/高频、高冲击/低频、高冲击/高频。共识被先验定义为≥70%。进行描述性统计。结果:入选34名运动脊柱外科医生(神经外科56%,骨科44%),调查完成率100%。推荐运动员进行高冲击/高频运动的情况达到≥70%的共识:C1环异常且无既往神经失用事件,枕部化的C1, 1个运动节段的Klippel-Feil伴/不伴后凸,无症状的Chiari畸形伴鸣管。我们也一致认为,患有先天性狭窄且经历过至少2次神经失用事件的运动员不应接受RTS治疗。虽然在其他领域没有达成协商一致意见,但讨论了值得注意的发现。结论:以下情况达到≥70%的共识,建议运动员恢复高冲击/高频运动:无神经失用事件的C1环异常,枕部C1,涉及1个运动节段的Klippel-Feil综合征,无症状的Chiari畸形,无鼻管。此外,也达成了一致意见,建议先天性狭窄合并2个或更多神经实用事件的运动员不进行RTS治疗。虽然在其他领域没有达成共识,但讨论了值得注意的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return-to-Sport Recommendations for Athletes With Congenital Cervical Spine Pathology: A Modified Delphi Consensus Survey of Expert Opinion.

Background and objectives: Recommendations guiding participation in sports for athletes with congenital cervical spine pathology are lacking, and management of these athletes remains challenging. Thus, the objective was to perform a modified Delphi consensus survey of expert opinion on return-to-sport (RTS) decisions in athletes with congenital cervical spine pathologies.

Methods: A cross-sectional, modified Delphi consensus survey investigating RTS decisions in athletes with various types of congenital cervical spine pathology was undertaken. An international panel of neurosurgery/orthopedic spine surgeons with sport expertise was identified. The cervical spine pathologies studied were craniocervical anomalies, Klippel-Feil syndrome, os odontoideum, Chiari malformation, and congenital cervical stenosis. A 2 × 2 scheme was used to classify sport risk based on impact forces and frequency: low impact/low frequency, low impact/high frequency, high impact/low frequency, and high impact/high frequency. Consensus was a-priori defined at ≥70%. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Of the 34 sports spine surgeons invited (56% neurosurgeons and 44% orthopedic surgeons), survey completion was 100%. The following scenarios achieved ≥70% consensus to recommend athletes to return-to-play high impact/high frequency sports: C1 ring anomaly and no prior neurapraxic event, occipitalized C1, Klippel-Feil of 1 motion segment with/without kyphosis, and asymptomatic Chiari malformation without syrinx. Consensus was also achieved that an athlete with congenital stenosis who has experienced at least 2 neurapraxic events should be advised not to RTS. Although consensus was not achieved in other areas, notable findings are discussed.

Conclusion: The following scenarios reached ≥70% consensus recommending athletes to return to high impact/high frequency sports: C1 ring anomaly without a prior neurapraxic event, occipitalized C1, Klippel-Feil syndrome involving 1 motion segment, and asymptomatic Chiari malformation without a syrinx. In addition, consensus was reached advising athletes with congenital stenosis with 2 or more neurapraxic events not to RTS. Although consensus was not obtained in other areas, notable findings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信