一种评估足底筋膜厚度和刚度的负重方法。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Mark Price, Thomas Mychost, Roozbeh Naemi, Nachiappan Chockalingam
{"title":"一种评估足底筋膜厚度和刚度的负重方法。","authors":"Mark Price, Thomas Mychost, Roozbeh Naemi, Nachiappan Chockalingam","doi":"10.7547/24-057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The plantar fascia of the foot is complex in both its structure and function. Previous research using ultrasound-based techniques has focused on nonweightbearing assessment of plantar fascia thickness (PFT) and plantar fascia stiffness (PFS). However, weightbearing assessment (closed chain) has not previously been performed in a way to demonstrate the response of the plantar fascia to load. This study aimed to develop a protocol that enables precise and consistent measurement of the PFT and PFS while bearing weight in a fixed calcaneal stance position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ultrasound probe capable of shear wave elastography was integrated into a bespoke three-dimensional printed platform incorporating a window to allow positioning of the ultrasound probe. This allowed a closed-chain assessment of the plantar fascia in which a standardized protocol was developed for measurement of the PFT and PFS. The images produced were composed of clips, which were then subdivided into multiple frames.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 participants (26 feet) had PFT and PFS assessed using the protocol. The results showed a low coefficient of variation (CV) in frame analysis for PFT (CV, 0) and PFS (CV, 0.01). One-clip analysis also demonstrated a low CV for PFT (CV, 0.02) and PFS (CV, 0.01). In addition, a cluster analysis indicated two distinct groups that demonstrated a strong correlation between PFT and PFS (group 1 and group 2 correlation coefficients, 0.83 and 0.98, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The protocol reported in this study was shown to be a valid and reliable method for assessing PFT and PFS in a weightbearing position, which has many clinical and research implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Method for Weightbearing Assessment of Plantar Fascia Thickness and Stiffness.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Price, Thomas Mychost, Roozbeh Naemi, Nachiappan Chockalingam\",\"doi\":\"10.7547/24-057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The plantar fascia of the foot is complex in both its structure and function. Previous research using ultrasound-based techniques has focused on nonweightbearing assessment of plantar fascia thickness (PFT) and plantar fascia stiffness (PFS). However, weightbearing assessment (closed chain) has not previously been performed in a way to demonstrate the response of the plantar fascia to load. This study aimed to develop a protocol that enables precise and consistent measurement of the PFT and PFS while bearing weight in a fixed calcaneal stance position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ultrasound probe capable of shear wave elastography was integrated into a bespoke three-dimensional printed platform incorporating a window to allow positioning of the ultrasound probe. This allowed a closed-chain assessment of the plantar fascia in which a standardized protocol was developed for measurement of the PFT and PFS. The images produced were composed of clips, which were then subdivided into multiple frames.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 participants (26 feet) had PFT and PFS assessed using the protocol. The results showed a low coefficient of variation (CV) in frame analysis for PFT (CV, 0) and PFS (CV, 0.01). One-clip analysis also demonstrated a low CV for PFT (CV, 0.02) and PFS (CV, 0.01). In addition, a cluster analysis indicated two distinct groups that demonstrated a strong correlation between PFT and PFS (group 1 and group 2 correlation coefficients, 0.83 and 0.98, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The protocol reported in this study was shown to be a valid and reliable method for assessing PFT and PFS in a weightbearing position, which has many clinical and research implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"115 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:足底筋膜在结构和功能上都是复杂的。以往基于超声技术的研究主要集中在对足底筋膜厚度(PFT)和足底筋膜刚度(PFS)的非负重评估。然而,负重评估(闭合链)以前没有以一种方式来证明足底筋膜对负荷的反应。本研究旨在开发一种方案,能够在固定跟骨站立位置承重时精确和一致地测量PFT和PFS。方法:将具有剪切波弹性成像能力的超声探头集成到定制的三维打印平台中,该平台包含一个窗口,以允许超声探头定位。这允许对足底筋膜进行封闭式评估,其中制定了测量PFT和PFS的标准化方案。生成的图像由片段组成,然后将其细分为多个帧。结果:共有13名参与者(26英尺)使用该方案进行了PFT和PFS评估。结果显示,帧分析中PFT (CV, 0)和PFS (CV, 0.01)的变异系数较低。单片段分析也显示PFT (CV, 0.02)和PFS (CV, 0.01)的CV较低。此外,聚类分析显示PFT和PFS之间存在明显的相关性(1组和2组的相关系数分别为0.83和0.98)。结论:本研究报告的方案被证明是评估负重位PFT和PFS的有效和可靠的方法,具有许多临床和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Method for Weightbearing Assessment of Plantar Fascia Thickness and Stiffness.

Background: The plantar fascia of the foot is complex in both its structure and function. Previous research using ultrasound-based techniques has focused on nonweightbearing assessment of plantar fascia thickness (PFT) and plantar fascia stiffness (PFS). However, weightbearing assessment (closed chain) has not previously been performed in a way to demonstrate the response of the plantar fascia to load. This study aimed to develop a protocol that enables precise and consistent measurement of the PFT and PFS while bearing weight in a fixed calcaneal stance position.

Methods: An ultrasound probe capable of shear wave elastography was integrated into a bespoke three-dimensional printed platform incorporating a window to allow positioning of the ultrasound probe. This allowed a closed-chain assessment of the plantar fascia in which a standardized protocol was developed for measurement of the PFT and PFS. The images produced were composed of clips, which were then subdivided into multiple frames.

Results: A total of 13 participants (26 feet) had PFT and PFS assessed using the protocol. The results showed a low coefficient of variation (CV) in frame analysis for PFT (CV, 0) and PFS (CV, 0.01). One-clip analysis also demonstrated a low CV for PFT (CV, 0.02) and PFS (CV, 0.01). In addition, a cluster analysis indicated two distinct groups that demonstrated a strong correlation between PFT and PFS (group 1 and group 2 correlation coefficients, 0.83 and 0.98, respectively).

Conclusions: The protocol reported in this study was shown to be a valid and reliable method for assessing PFT and PFS in a weightbearing position, which has many clinical and research implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信