主观药物效果评级预测大麻自我管理的人谁使用大麻每天。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Thomas P Shellenberg, Justin C Strickland, Sean D Regnier, Preston T Tolbert, Stephanie Lake, Michael J Wesley, William W Stoops, Ziva D Cooper, Margaret Haney, Joshua A Lile
{"title":"主观药物效果评级预测大麻自我管理的人谁使用大麻每天。","authors":"Thomas P Shellenberg, Justin C Strickland, Sean D Regnier, Preston T Tolbert, Stephanie Lake, Michael J Wesley, William W Stoops, Ziva D Cooper, Margaret Haney, Joshua A Lile","doi":"10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As interest in the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis-derived products grows, accurate predictors of abuse potential will be vital for informing regulatory decisions. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration recommends using subjective effect ratings of Drug Liking as the primary measure in human abuse potential studies. However, dissociations between subjective ratings and drug-taking behavior have been previously reported. This retrospective analysis determined if any subjective effects questionnaire items uniquely predicted cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily (N = 89; 71 male and 18 female). Data from 4 previous studies across 2 research sites that included cannabis self-administration and subjective effects assessments were combined. Concentrations of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahyrdocannabinol (THC) were similar across studies (5.5%, 5.6%, or 5.9%), although milligram THC dose varied based on administration procedures. Ratings of Good Effect, High, Sedated/Tired, Drug Liking, Stimulated, and Willingness to Take Again were used as predictors. In each study, a money option ($0.50 or $1.00) was scheduled as an alternative to cannabis puffs in self-administration procedures. Proportion of choices for cannabis puffs over total choice trials (3 or 8 trials) was used as the primary outcome. Generalized linear models revealed that higher ratings of Willingness to Take Again (OR = 1.04) were associated with increased odds of self-administering active THC cannabis, while higher ratings of Stimulated were associated with decreased odds of self-administering placebo cannabis (OR = 0.94). These results suggest that subjective ratings of Willingness to Take Again should be considered as a primary outcome when assessing abuse potential for novel cannabinoid products. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This retrospective analysis found that subjective ratings of Willingness to Take Again was a more predictive measure of cannabis self-administration than Drug Liking in people who use cannabis daily. Refining human abuse potential assessments to prioritize measures that better align with drug-taking behavior could improve regulatory evaluations of novel cannabinoid products.</p>","PeriodicalId":16798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics","volume":"392 7","pages":"103622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective drug-effect ratings predict cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P Shellenberg, Justin C Strickland, Sean D Regnier, Preston T Tolbert, Stephanie Lake, Michael J Wesley, William W Stoops, Ziva D Cooper, Margaret Haney, Joshua A Lile\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As interest in the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis-derived products grows, accurate predictors of abuse potential will be vital for informing regulatory decisions. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration recommends using subjective effect ratings of Drug Liking as the primary measure in human abuse potential studies. However, dissociations between subjective ratings and drug-taking behavior have been previously reported. This retrospective analysis determined if any subjective effects questionnaire items uniquely predicted cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily (N = 89; 71 male and 18 female). Data from 4 previous studies across 2 research sites that included cannabis self-administration and subjective effects assessments were combined. Concentrations of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahyrdocannabinol (THC) were similar across studies (5.5%, 5.6%, or 5.9%), although milligram THC dose varied based on administration procedures. Ratings of Good Effect, High, Sedated/Tired, Drug Liking, Stimulated, and Willingness to Take Again were used as predictors. In each study, a money option ($0.50 or $1.00) was scheduled as an alternative to cannabis puffs in self-administration procedures. Proportion of choices for cannabis puffs over total choice trials (3 or 8 trials) was used as the primary outcome. Generalized linear models revealed that higher ratings of Willingness to Take Again (OR = 1.04) were associated with increased odds of self-administering active THC cannabis, while higher ratings of Stimulated were associated with decreased odds of self-administering placebo cannabis (OR = 0.94). These results suggest that subjective ratings of Willingness to Take Again should be considered as a primary outcome when assessing abuse potential for novel cannabinoid products. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This retrospective analysis found that subjective ratings of Willingness to Take Again was a more predictive measure of cannabis self-administration than Drug Liking in people who use cannabis daily. Refining human abuse potential assessments to prioritize measures that better align with drug-taking behavior could improve regulatory evaluations of novel cannabinoid products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"392 7\",\"pages\":\"103622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103622\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpet.2025.103622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人们对大麻衍生产品潜在治疗益处的兴趣日益浓厚,对滥用潜力的准确预测对于监管决策至关重要。目前,美国食品和药物管理局建议使用药物喜好的主观效果评级作为人类滥用潜力研究的主要措施。然而,主观评分和吸毒行为之间的分离已经被报道过。这项回顾性分析确定了是否有任何主观影响问卷项目能够唯一地预测每天使用大麻的人的大麻自我管理(N = 89;男性71人,女性18人)。之前在两个研究地点进行的4项研究的数据,包括大麻自我给药和主观影响评估。各研究中Δ9-tetrahyrdocannabinol (THC)的浓度相似(5.5%、5.6%或5.9%),尽管毫克THC剂量因给药程序而异。效果好、高、镇静/疲劳、药物喜好、刺激和再次服用意愿的评分被用作预测因子。在每项研究中,在自我管理过程中,一种货币选择(0.50美元或1.00美元)被安排作为大麻泡芙的替代品。大麻泡芙的选择占总选择试验(3或8个试验)的比例被用作主要结果。广义线性模型显示,较高的再次吸食意愿评分(OR = 1.04)与自我服用活性THC大麻的几率增加相关,而较高的刺激评分与自我服用安慰剂大麻的几率降低相关(OR = 0.94)。这些结果表明,在评估新型大麻素产品的滥用潜力时,应将再次服用意愿的主观评分视为主要结果。意义声明:这项回顾性分析发现,在每天使用大麻的人群中,“愿意再次服用”的主观评分比“药物喜好”更能预测大麻自我管理。改进人类滥用潜力评估,优先考虑更好地与吸毒行为相一致的措施,可以改善对新型大麻素产品的监管评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective drug-effect ratings predict cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily.

As interest in the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabis-derived products grows, accurate predictors of abuse potential will be vital for informing regulatory decisions. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration recommends using subjective effect ratings of Drug Liking as the primary measure in human abuse potential studies. However, dissociations between subjective ratings and drug-taking behavior have been previously reported. This retrospective analysis determined if any subjective effects questionnaire items uniquely predicted cannabis self-administration in people who use cannabis daily (N = 89; 71 male and 18 female). Data from 4 previous studies across 2 research sites that included cannabis self-administration and subjective effects assessments were combined. Concentrations of Δ9-tetrahyrdocannabinol (THC) were similar across studies (5.5%, 5.6%, or 5.9%), although milligram THC dose varied based on administration procedures. Ratings of Good Effect, High, Sedated/Tired, Drug Liking, Stimulated, and Willingness to Take Again were used as predictors. In each study, a money option ($0.50 or $1.00) was scheduled as an alternative to cannabis puffs in self-administration procedures. Proportion of choices for cannabis puffs over total choice trials (3 or 8 trials) was used as the primary outcome. Generalized linear models revealed that higher ratings of Willingness to Take Again (OR = 1.04) were associated with increased odds of self-administering active THC cannabis, while higher ratings of Stimulated were associated with decreased odds of self-administering placebo cannabis (OR = 0.94). These results suggest that subjective ratings of Willingness to Take Again should be considered as a primary outcome when assessing abuse potential for novel cannabinoid products. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This retrospective analysis found that subjective ratings of Willingness to Take Again was a more predictive measure of cannabis self-administration than Drug Liking in people who use cannabis daily. Refining human abuse potential assessments to prioritize measures that better align with drug-taking behavior could improve regulatory evaluations of novel cannabinoid products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A leading research journal in the field of pharmacology published since 1909, JPET provides broad coverage of all aspects of the interactions of chemicals with biological systems, including autonomic, behavioral, cardiovascular, cellular, clinical, developmental, gastrointestinal, immuno-, neuro-, pulmonary, and renal pharmacology, as well as analgesics, drug abuse, metabolism and disposition, chemotherapy, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信