氨莫洛酮与传统糖皮质激素治疗杜氏肌营养不良:疗效和安全性综述及荟萃分析。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dawood Javed, Abdullah Javed, Faran Ahmed Jajja, Ahmed Jahanzeb
{"title":"氨莫洛酮与传统糖皮质激素治疗杜氏肌营养不良:疗效和安全性综述及荟萃分析。","authors":"Dawood Javed, Abdullah Javed, Faran Ahmed Jajja, Ahmed Jahanzeb","doi":"10.1177/87551225251349402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of vamorolone, a dissociative glucocorticoid, compared with traditional glucocorticoids in treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), aiming to assess its potential as a safer alternative with comparable therapeutic benefits. <b>Data Sources:</b> A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science from inception till June 2024. Search terms included (Vamorolone) AND (Corticosteroids OR Glucocorticoids OR Prednisone) AND (Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy OR related terms). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included, with no language restrictions. <b>Study Selection and Data Extraction:</b> From 276 identified reports, 135 were screened after duplicate removal, and 30 underwent full-text review. Five studies (2 RCTs, 2 observational, 1 nonrandomized trial) involving 370 patients were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data on efficacy (TTSTAND, TTRW, TTCLIMB velocities) and safety (height percentile, body mass index-z score, osteocalcin, P1NP) using Microsoft Excel, resolving discrepancies through consensus. <b>Data Synthesis:</b> Vamorolone significantly improved TTSTAND (MD = -0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.06 to -0.004, <i>P</i> = .02), TTRW (MD = -0.11, 95% CI = -0.22 to -0.01, <i>P</i> = .04), and TTCLIMB velocities (MD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.08 to -0.003, <i>P</i> = .03). Safety outcomes showed enhanced height percentile (MD = 16.28, 95% CI = 6.31-26.25, <i>P</i> = .001) and bone biomarkers (osteocalcin: MD = 15.68, <i>P</i> < .00001; P1NP: MD = 158.34, <i>P</i> < .00001), with no significant body mass index-z score difference. <b>Conclusions:</b> Vamorolone offers comparable efficacy with traditional glucocorticoids in DMD, with improved motor function and safer profiles in growth and bone health, suggesting its potential to transform DMD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251349402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vamorolone Versus Traditional Glucocorticoids in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Dawood Javed, Abdullah Javed, Faran Ahmed Jajja, Ahmed Jahanzeb\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225251349402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of vamorolone, a dissociative glucocorticoid, compared with traditional glucocorticoids in treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), aiming to assess its potential as a safer alternative with comparable therapeutic benefits. <b>Data Sources:</b> A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science from inception till June 2024. Search terms included (Vamorolone) AND (Corticosteroids OR Glucocorticoids OR Prednisone) AND (Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy OR related terms). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included, with no language restrictions. <b>Study Selection and Data Extraction:</b> From 276 identified reports, 135 were screened after duplicate removal, and 30 underwent full-text review. Five studies (2 RCTs, 2 observational, 1 nonrandomized trial) involving 370 patients were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data on efficacy (TTSTAND, TTRW, TTCLIMB velocities) and safety (height percentile, body mass index-z score, osteocalcin, P1NP) using Microsoft Excel, resolving discrepancies through consensus. <b>Data Synthesis:</b> Vamorolone significantly improved TTSTAND (MD = -0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.06 to -0.004, <i>P</i> = .02), TTRW (MD = -0.11, 95% CI = -0.22 to -0.01, <i>P</i> = .04), and TTCLIMB velocities (MD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.08 to -0.003, <i>P</i> = .03). Safety outcomes showed enhanced height percentile (MD = 16.28, 95% CI = 6.31-26.25, <i>P</i> = .001) and bone biomarkers (osteocalcin: MD = 15.68, <i>P</i> < .00001; P1NP: MD = 158.34, <i>P</i> < .00001), with no significant body mass index-z score difference. <b>Conclusions:</b> Vamorolone offers comparable efficacy with traditional glucocorticoids in DMD, with improved motor function and safer profiles in growth and bone health, suggesting its potential to transform DMD management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87551225251349402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251349402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251349402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析评估了游离性糖皮质激素vamorolone与传统糖皮质激素治疗杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)的疗效和安全性,旨在评估其作为一种更安全的替代治疗方案的潜力。数据来源:系统检索PubMed (MEDLINE)、Embase和Web of Science,从建站到2024年6月。搜索词包括(氨莫洛酮)和(皮质类固醇或糖皮质激素或强的松)和(杜氏肌营养不良症或相关术语)。仅纳入随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究,无语言限制。研究选择和数据提取:从276份确定的报告中,135份在重复删除后进行筛选,30份进行全文审查。纳入5项研究(2项随机对照试验,2项观察性试验,1项非随机试验),涉及370例患者。两位评论者使用Microsoft Excel独立提取疗效(TTSTAND, tttrw, TTCLIMB速度)和安全性(身高百分位数,体重指数-z评分,骨钙素,P1NP)数据,通过共识解决差异。数据综合:Vamorolone显著改善TTSTAND (MD = -0.03, 95%可信区间[CI] = -0.06 ~ -0.004, P = 0.02)、TTRW (MD = -0.11, 95% CI = -0.22 ~ -0.01, P = 0.04)和TTCLIMB速度(MD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.08 ~ -0.003, P = 0.03)。安全性结果显示身高百分位数(MD = 16.28, 95% CI = 6.31-26.25, P = 0.001)和骨骼生物标志物(骨钙素:MD = 15.68, P < 0.001;P1NP: MD = 158.34, P < 0.00001),体重指数-z评分差异无统计学意义。结论:Vamorolone治疗DMD的疗效与传统糖皮质激素相当,运动功能改善,生长和骨骼健康更安全,表明其有可能改变DMD的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vamorolone Versus Traditional Glucocorticoids in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of vamorolone, a dissociative glucocorticoid, compared with traditional glucocorticoids in treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), aiming to assess its potential as a safer alternative with comparable therapeutic benefits. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science from inception till June 2024. Search terms included (Vamorolone) AND (Corticosteroids OR Glucocorticoids OR Prednisone) AND (Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy OR related terms). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included, with no language restrictions. Study Selection and Data Extraction: From 276 identified reports, 135 were screened after duplicate removal, and 30 underwent full-text review. Five studies (2 RCTs, 2 observational, 1 nonrandomized trial) involving 370 patients were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data on efficacy (TTSTAND, TTRW, TTCLIMB velocities) and safety (height percentile, body mass index-z score, osteocalcin, P1NP) using Microsoft Excel, resolving discrepancies through consensus. Data Synthesis: Vamorolone significantly improved TTSTAND (MD = -0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.06 to -0.004, P = .02), TTRW (MD = -0.11, 95% CI = -0.22 to -0.01, P = .04), and TTCLIMB velocities (MD = -0.04, 95% CI = -0.08 to -0.003, P = .03). Safety outcomes showed enhanced height percentile (MD = 16.28, 95% CI = 6.31-26.25, P = .001) and bone biomarkers (osteocalcin: MD = 15.68, P < .00001; P1NP: MD = 158.34, P < .00001), with no significant body mass index-z score difference. Conclusions: Vamorolone offers comparable efficacy with traditional glucocorticoids in DMD, with improved motor function and safer profiles in growth and bone health, suggesting its potential to transform DMD management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信